McCain ‘gained capital’ yesterday? I don’t think so

The 2008 presidential campaign effectively started long before yesterday’s elections shook up Congress, and it’s only natural that that every likely candidate wants to use the results to boost their respective chances. Some, like Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), have a very tough pitch to make today. Meanwhile, four Republican governors who’ve been thinking about the ’08 race — Arkansas’ Mike Huckabee, Massachusetts’ Mitt Romney, New York’s George Pataki, and Colorado’s Bill Owens — all saw Democrats win in the race to replace them, which hurts their standing a bit.

And then there’s Sen. [tag]John McCain[/tag] (R-Ariz.), who, just a couple of week ago, joked that he’d “commit suicide” if Dems reclaimed the Senate majority. The far-right Washington Times characterized the Arizona senator as one of the few Republicans who benefited from this year’s Democratic gains.

Sen. John McCain emerged from yesterday’s elections as one of Republicans’ only winners as Democrats made solid gains and both parties turn an eye toward 2008.

The Arizona Republican, who wasn’t up for re-election, rallied to the side of Republican candidates at 131 events — a strong showing that displayed his rising popularity. His strength was underscored Monday when Charlie Crist, Florida’s new Republican governor, chose to skip a scheduled rally with President Bush for an event with Mr. McCain.

“There’s going to be a batch of people who are going to personally owe McCain and there’s going to be another batch of people who are going to have to rethink their view of him,” said Michael McKenna, a Republican strategist and pollster.

There are a couple of things wrong with this. First, McCain did campaign for a lot of Republicans, most of whom feel indebted to him today, but many of whom lost. Second, the GOP establishment can “rethink” McCain all they want, but that won’t change the fact that voters made it quite clear yesterday that he’s wildly off-base on one of the central issues of the day.

The “rethink” approach articulated by McKenna is probably based on the notion that Republicans lost independent voters, McCain is generally popular with independent voters, so if the GOP is going to win, McCain is the right guy to follow.

Except he’s not.

In addition to corruption, frustration with Iraq is clearly driving [last night’s] results. And, as Tim Russert just suggested on MSNBC, it’s hard to see how you can be a major-party nominee in 2008 without a plan for withdrawing from Iraq. Well, just about the only person in America other than George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Don Rumsfeld who thinks we need to double-down in Iraq is John McCain.

Now, as my colleague John Judis has suggested, it’s possible that McCain’s position will evolve over the next two years. But, for the moment, he’s looking like the first-tier GOP candidate most out of touch with the voting public.

The Dobson crowd doesn’t trust McCain and is convinced he’s a phony; the anti-immigration crowd thinks McCain is a heretic; and no one in Congress supports the unpopular war in Iraq with as much enthusiasm as McCain.

The Washington Times may see him as a “winner” after last night, but I see coming out of 2006 as damaged goods.

There’s a little known after-effect of a tsunami.

Sure—everyone knows about the devasting impact when it comes roaring up onto the beaches, and pushes inland.

But not too many know that it’s counterstrike—when the wave is drawing back into the sea, creating massive rip currents and a very nasty undertow—is equally as lethal to the unobservant passer-by.

McCain is that passer-by, and the undertow that this tsunami is about to create will put “paid” on any chance he ever had at the White House.

How?

He’s left standing, while those around him got flattened. But as the damage becomes more apparent, McCain will suddenly find himself surrounded by Dems who are “real” Straight-Talk-Expressers. He’ll find himself surrounded by Dems who know what morals and ethics “really” are, unlike this faux neocon who calls himself a “war hero.”

Pennsylvania’s Casey will outshine him. So will Virginia’s Webb, and Rhode Island’s Whitehouse. Missouri’s McCaskill will make him appear tarnished, as will Montana’s Tester, and Ohio’s Brown.

McCain will be sucked out to sea; his moment gone forever….

  • I fail to see how Asa Hutchinson’s failure to capture the Governorship of Arkansas — a historically and heavily democratic state — during the greatest national democratic sweep in history reflects poorly on Mike Huckabee. Mike Huckabee was elected twice in Arkansas by Democrats because he is a strong leader, a gifted politician, and a remarkable person.

    Asa Hutchinson isn’t.

    BSR

  • It’s hard for a senator to have political capital nationaly, only three sitting US senators have been elected POTUS, B. Harrison, Harding and JFK. McCain, Frist and Clinton they all have a voting record that the opposing party can distort and misrepresent during the campaign, just like they did to Kerry in 2004. Frist is also insane, which should work against him.

  • RichM makes the historical point about Senators not winning elections.

    All true, but the fact remains that Senators are the most egotistical of politicians, who when faced with the prospect of some mere governor winning the party’s nomination, will decide they are special enough to buck history, and besides they are so much more intelligent and better on the issues, that they decide to run.

    I mean, what else explains Christopher Dodd of Connecticut thinking he can run for president? Certainly no rationale calculation.

  • Comments are closed.