Wednesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* I’m still officially neutral on the House Majority Leader fight between Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and John Murtha (D-Pa.), but if Roll Call is right, Murtha has a problem. Apparently, Murtha told a group of Democratic moderates yesterday that an ethics and lobbying reform bill being pushed by Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders was “total crap,” but he’d support it anyway. If he was quoted accurately, it was a really dumb thing to say.

* A couple of decades late, Bush is finally making it to Vietnam. He, apparently, isn’t particularly popular there, either.

* The joke that’s making the rounds: “Q: How is Vietnam different from Iraq? A: Bush had a plan for getting out of Vietnam.”

* We’re already seeing vast improvements on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. We’re going from a committee chairman who believes climate change is a “hoax” to a chairwoman who will hold substantive hearings on the issue.

* Saying “judges are the most important,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the single greatest failure of the Democrats as an opposition party was allowing Samuel Alito to join the Supreme Court.

* Sen.-elect Jim Webb (D-Va.) has a really good op-ed today on “our society’s steady drift toward a class-based system, the likes of which we have not seen since the 19th century.”

* Is there any reason in the world the AP cares about the brand and color of Nancy Pelosi’s clothing? Did the AP ever mention Dennis Hastert’s attire?

* It sounds like the WaPo is about to undergo some fairly significant changes. I’m not at all sure they’re for the better.

* It looks like the Clinton/Obama ’08 race is a little closer — in two separate polls — than most insiders would have guessed.

* In Minnesota, Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R), who is generally considered quite conservative, called for extending health care access to up to 90,000 uninsured children as a step toward coverage for all Minnesotans. Powerline sounds borderline suicidal.

* Ironically, by pulling his little re-redistricting stunt a few years ago, Tom DeLay really screwed Texas.

* I’m surprised a think tank like this one hasn’t existed before, but there’s never been a better time for it.

* I know it’s sweeps, and I know Fox isn’t known for Masterpiece Theater-like standards, but this is low. Really low.

* Newt wants the GOP to abandon the Bush White House. That’s probably a good idea.

* Chad Castagana, the right-wing Freeper who is accused of having sent white powder to lawmakers and media personalities he doesn’t like, was tracked down, according to an FBI affidavit, in a bizarre way. Apparently, the same day Castagana was picking up the envelopes and stamps at the post office for some of his terrorist threats, he purchased a $15 money order and had it made out to “Friends of Katherine Harris.”

If none of these particular items are of interest, consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Re: Murtha’s comment

Apparently, that was a mis-quote. MSNBC is reporting that the actual quote is, “It’s total crap we need ethics reform in the first place.”

Murtha’s meaning was that he felt people should have ethics already, without a bill demanding it.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/11/15/144727/67

  • Newt wants the GOP mangy rats to abandon the Bush White Star Line ship that was recently featured in a special effects spectacularHouse.

    Re: The AP. Didn’t you know? The only time news agencies may comment on a man’s attire is when he is caught with his pants down.

    OK, that thing about OJ nearly made me puke.

  • Re: Alito, looks like the Dems really screwed the pooch by not fillibustering the man, based upon the election results (oh, and the contemporary polls showing that a majority of the public wanted the Dems to put a check on Bush’s selections). Incredible.

  • Thanks for the heads-up, SNR. #1.

    If Hoyer did indeed start this misquote release then I guess that answers the question of who should be Majority Leader. Hoyer does seem to be a lying hack and we’ve had plenty of those for the past 6–12 years.

  • Re Nancy Pelosi’s attire & Hastert, I think that comment about his attire would be in the entertainment section of the paper. Circus tents are not spoken of in the politcal section (I know, Michael Moore is fat, too).

  • from the Hillary/Obama polls:

    In our brand new Hotline/Diageo poll, in WH ’08 matchups among RVs, John McCain leads Hillary Clinton 45%-40%; he leads Barack Obama 39%-35%; and he leads John Edwards 42%-35%…

    Wow…McCain vs. Obama results in a lot more undecided. That’s got to be a big boost to Obama supporters. This will continue to be very interesting.

  • Let’s hope Schumer’s previous timidity about standing up to Bush’s judicial nominees is a thing of the past. By renominating Bolton, his previous passel of judicial appointments and Kent Thomlinson (what an ass!), Bush apparently feels that he can corner the Dems as being obstructionists and force them into their passive ways again. Don’t fall for it Chuck! The nation wants you to say no. Bush is drowning … throw him an anvil.

    As for Steny Hoyer, there’s already one Lieberman in the party, don’t make it two. Frankly I agree with Murtha, we shouldn’t have to legislate ethics into our federal legislature.

  • A 39 year old man who lives with his parents and idolizes Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and Katherine Harris? Who’d have thought? And for him to be unstable to boot. Geez, what’s the world coming to?

  • I’m so happy the draft-dodging, chickenhawk, sanctimonious crackhead is going to Vietnam. Better late than never. Maybe he’ll take time to crawl though the tunnels of Cu Chi (where I was) dressed like a “tunnel rat.” He can tack up a “Mission Accomplished!” banner on the way out.

  • I think the Webb op-ed piece should put the rest the notion that the Democrats have shifted to the right in this election. Webb has written a good ol’ fashion progressive indictment of Republican economic policies

  • “Re Nancy Pelosi’s attire & Hastert, I think that comment about his attire would be in the entertainment section of the paper. Circus tents are not spoken of in the politcal section (I know, Michael Moore is fat, too).” – BuzzMon

    Curse you BuzzMon I was going to say that! (at least the circus tent allusion)

    I knew Jim Webb was worth voting for. Just from reading his first book.

  • Agreed that the Hoyer misquote of Murtha says everything anyone needs to know about that Corporate Whore whose only complaint about the DeLay Machine is it wasn’t the Hoyer Machine. “Two Liebermans” – that’s a good one.

    I’m glad the OJ thing isn’t “appropriate” for NBC, since that shows exactly what is “appropriate” for Fox and what kind of audience the Kultur Wehrmacht really has. I wonder if they follow all the rules of their mentor, Josef Goebbels and “pull out their gun when they hear the word culture”???

  • A 39 year old man who lives with his parents and idolizes Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and Katherine Harris?
    Comment by Doctor Biobrain

    🙂 Not to be crude, but that’s like the worst, er, fantasy material I’ve ever seen. His intimate sessions with himself must be pretty bad.

  • I am a 2 tour Vietnam Veteran who recently retired after 36 years of working in the Defense Industrial Complex on many of the weapons systems being usedby our forces as we speak.

    If you are interested in a view of the inside of the Pentagon procurement process from Vietnam to Iraq please check the posting at my blog entitled, “Odyssey of Armements”

    The Pentagon is a giant, incredibly complex establishment,budgeted in excess of $500B per year. The Rumsfelds, the Administrations and the Congressmen come and go but the real machinery of policy and procurement keeps grinding away, presenting the politicos who arrive with detail and alternatives slanted to perpetuate itself.

    How can any newcomer, be he a President, a Congressman or even the Sec. Def. to be – Mr. Gates- understand such complexity, particulary if heretofore he has not had the clearance to get the full details?

    Answer- he can’t. Therefor he accepts the alternatives provided by the career establishment that never goes away and he hopes he makes the right choices. Or he is influenced by a lobbyist or two representing companies in his district or special interest groups.

    From a practical standpoint, policy and war decisions are made far below the levels of the talking heads who take the heat or the credit for the results.

    This situation is unfortunate but it is ablsolute fact. Take it from one who has been to war and worked in the establishment.

    This giant policy making and war machine will eventually come apart and have to be put back together to operate smaller, leaner and on less fuel. But that won’t happen unitil it hits a brick wall at high speed.

    We will then have to run a Volkswagon instead of a Caddy and get along somehow. We better start practicing now and get off our high horse. Our golden aura in the world is beginning to dull from arrogance.

  • If you had any idea of how poluted military bases are you’d appreciate the clever scheme Northerners used to convince Sam Nunn to move them all to Georgia. Putting military bases in the South is the ultimate example of NIMBY.

    Comment by Lance — 11/15/2006 @ 2:43 pm

    What is NIMBY?

  • From the Olbermann link:
    “It appears that Mr. Castagana was a poster to the FreeRepublic, which, as you know, is an online library of some of the most thoughtful right-wing thinkers out there.”
    I may have to watch the video to figure out the spirit in which this line was uttered.

  • Frankly I agree with Murtha, we shouldn’t have to legislate ethics into our federal legislature.

    It’s a pity, then, that Murtha is one of the people that makes it necessary to have ethics legislation.

  • Truly a maxi mini report today Mr. CB. Thanks to SNR for the clarification regarding Murtha. The prospect of the story being accurate was very disheartening.

    I’m really looking forward to Boxer taking the helm at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. She is going to put some scumbags in her deep iron skillet and scorch their soft white hineys. It will be a great way to start the new year.

  • Apparently, that was a mis-quote. MSNBC is reporting that the actual quote is, “It’s total crap we need ethics reform in the first place.”

    TPM has Murtha telling Chris Matthews that ethics reform ranks very low on his list of priorities. It doesn’t make him look any better.

    Sorry, but it seems a tad hypocritical for Murtha to suggest ethical behavior should be second nature when he was implicated in accepting bribes in ABSCAM 20 some years ago.

    I think Steny Hoyer’s a DLC weasel, but Murtha’s not a much better choice for majority leader.

  • In Re,

    Hoyer vs. Murtha…
    They’re -both- ethically challenged.
    So Murtha gets a free ride because he’s adamantly against the war?
    That is shit…. and it is EXACTLY the kind of thing that will come back and bite the Democrats in the ass in the long run.
    Dump BOTH of them and choose someone not tainted.
    Actually, the very fact that it’s come down to a choice between these two,
    shows that the Dems are useless.
    That, and the way they whimpered and folded before the election
    that “impeachment was off the table”.
    The Dems seem not just toothless… they seem to have forgotten that such a thing as -dentures- exist.
    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

    By the way, I’m not a republican troll.
    I hate, detest, fear and loathe the Refuglies more than any other mortal…
    And I love that they got their nasty asses kicked in the election.
    I just fail to see how anyone can be jubilant about the Democrats.

    If Bush isn’t impeached and Cheney not put on a chain-gang,
    freedom has failed… ah, shit, who am I kiddin’…
    It’s already failed. The wiretaps, the death of habeas corpus, the secret prisons… etc, etc.

    I wish all the best for the U.S., I really, sincerely do.
    But I wouldn’t bet on it.
    You’re heading for either theocracy or, at least, a second civil war
    within the next century if you don’t get your act together.

  • * A couple of decades late, Bush is finally making it to Vietnam. He, apparently, isn’t particularly popular there, either. — CB

    They’re gonna like him even less once they get a-hold of this tidbit:
    http://thinkprogress.org/2006/11/15/vietnam-bush-wrong-flag/
    Reminiscent of his “Sunni? Shiite? I thought they were all Muslims”…

    * Saying “judges are the most important,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the single greatest failure of the Democrats as an opposition party was allowing Samuel Alito to join the Supreme Court. — CB

    Scalito, Torture… 6 o’one… True; torture may be reversed. But so can Scalito have a heart attack and drop dead. There’s *no tomorrow* , when it comes to compromising one’s principles, and that should be the “compass” by which a Democrat sails.

    * Sen.-elect Jim Webb (D-Va.) has a really good op-ed today on “our society’s steady drift toward a class-based system, the likes of which we have not seen since the 19th century.” — CB

    Webb wasn’t my choice in the primaries (I’m suspicious of party-switchers; have seen too many opportunists back in Poland), but I’m not so bull-headed that I won’t admit I was *all wet*; the more I see of him, the better I like him. And I bet it was his “old credentials” (from Reagan’s admin) that got this piece published in WSJ, despite its totally subversive message (from WSJ’s Op-ed POV). You GO, Jim!

    Hoyer vs. Murtha…
    They’re -both- ethically challenged.
    So Murtha gets a free ride because he’s adamantly against the war?
    That is shit…. and it is EXACTLY the kind of thing that will come back and bite the Democrats in the ass in the long run.
    Dump BOTH of them and choose someone not tainted. — HairlessMonkeyDK, @22

    Yeah, a third “party” would be my choice also — seniority be damned — and for the very same reasons. We *can’t afford* to be less than squeaky-clean now, or “all our cake will be dough again” (as the Brits say) in ’08, no matter how hard Dean works to turn the tide.

    Re your screen name… Haven’t seen/heard that description of a “human” in 35? yrs or more. Must have been one of the first books I read in English that was not on the compulsory reading list. Sure brings back memories

  • Libra… heh..
    Well, I chose this name when I started commenting on NoGodBlog,
    and since then I’ve used it on FSTDT and wherever on this interweb-thingie I find myself caught.

  • My favorite tidbit from the WaPo article about Bush in Vietnam: “Even though Bush, another lame duck president,…”

    Classic.. WaPo officially declares GWB’s duck status!

  • * Is there any reason in the world the AP cares about the brand and color of Nancy Pelosi’s clothing? Did the AP ever mention Dennis Hastert’s attire?>>

    Well, Hastert is pretty frumpy looking – I hardly think mentioning his clothing/attire would be complimentary. :-p

    That said, it’s pretty sexist of the AP to describe what Pelosi is wearing. A picture is worth a thousand words, at any rate. And frumpy is NOT the way I’d describe her.

    (This takes me back to the days when Patty Hearst was on trial and every single day of that trial the press just had to mention what she was wearing. It was so stupid. Do the fashionistas rule everything?)

  • Framing Nancy Pelosi by her attire is an attempt to marginalize her. She is the first female Speaker (and a Democrat!). Some folks just cannot get their brains about that.

    That said, Madame Speaker always looks a helluva lot more “pulled together” than Ham ever did (could). But, that’s giving her a pretty low bar.

  • I am so sick of sleazy politics. The Republicans have sensitized me to it and used up all my tolerance and the Dems have zero allowance for practicing it. Right now I’m thinking of Hoyer’s misquote and Murtha’s arrogant attitude toward ethics. Be ethical.

  • It is obvious that the press should spend far more time on Ms. Pelosi’s ideas and accomplishments than her attire. However, she always looks really professional and well dressed. Although this real of “girl-y” of me, I am actually kinda interested in how she does that. So, I don’t mind information about the designers she chooses…..

  • Re Pelosi’s clothes: When W&L (where my DH taught) went co-ed, he’d come home at teh beginning of every semester and describe his studens thusly: boys were (or weren’t) bright. Girls were (or weren’t) cute/attractive. Drove me nuts. But, after a couple of years of my asking “but, is he cute?” and “but, is she bright?” he finally admitted that “all the girls were brighter than the boys, so it’s not worth mentioning”. So I let it go…

  • Comments are closed.