Monday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* In New Mexico’s closely-watched 1st congressional district, Rep. Heather Wilson (R-N.M.) appears to have eked out a narrow victory over state Attorney General Patricia Madrid (D) in one of the remaining undecided House races. According to the final tally, Wilson edged Madrid by about 900 votes.

* In Montana, state Sen. Sam Kitzenberg filed papers with the secretary of state’s office late last week to become a Democrat, and in the process, swung the chamber from a 25-25 split to a 26-24 Dem majority. Kitzenberg, a former high school teacher who describes himself as a moderate, has been a Republican his entire adult life, including 12 years in the legislature, but no more. “It’s kind of like a family, it’s kind of hard to leave,” Kitzenberg said. “But I didn’t leave them — they left me.”

* Hoping to dispel rumors to the contrary, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), he of “bridge to nowhere” fame, announced late last week that he will run for re-election in 2008, at the tender age of 84.

* Dems looking for a top-tier candidate to take on Sen. John Sununu (R) in New Hampshire in 2008 can scratch Gov. John Lynch (D) off their short list. Lynch, who was re-elected to a second term two weeks ago with 74% support, said he will not take on Sununu in two years.

* In 2008 news, Sen. John Kerry said yesterday that he’s still considering another presidential campaign. Asked if the “botched joke” would undermine him, Kerry said, “Not in the least. I am looking at it in the same way. The people that I have talked to across the country, my team’s confident and strong. I don’t know what I’ll do. I’ve apologized and we have to move on to the real issues that face this country.”

* And in the funniest political story I’ve seen in a long while, Fairfield University professor John Orman contacted Connecticut’s secretary of state’s office and learned that the Connecticut for Lieberman party had no registered members in the state. As a result, Orman joined the “party” and went home to call a meeting of all registered Connecticut for Lieberman members (total number: one). He nominated himself chairman, seconded the nomination, cast his vote for himself and proceeded to establish party rules. Read the whole thing.

John Orman is a genius! The devil is in the details, and by not minding them, Lieberman just got stuck in the bum by with the devil’s pitchfork. It seems the emperor’s political party has no clothes and John Orman just pointed that out to the world.

  • There are bound to be an infinite number of consultants ready to take Kerry’s money from him. The man should really get a life or a clue.

  • So “Connecticut for Lieberman” was a sham, without a single registered member, not even Lieberman himself.

    So who nominated Lieberman to be a candidate? Did he commit election fraud, aided and abetted by compliant state officials? Could this invalidate his election and throw it to Lamont by default?

    I would really be interested in how this plays out. 🙂

  • Orman said the “party” is upset that Lieberman has abandoned it and says he is an “Independent Democrat.”

    Bloody hell, I want to buy this man a drink. I want to buy him the whole fricking bar. I hope he follows Joe around asking why he abandoned his faithful party.

    Troublemakers of the world, unite and take over.

  • CONNECTICUT FOR LIEBERMAN!! HA!! HA!!

    That is too funny. I think Orman showed great restraint in setting the bylaws. Personally I would have set up mandatory financial contributions by sitting party members, term limits for party members etc.

  • I understand now why Kerry was defeated in a contest where most of the voters wanted anyone but Bush. He is as deeply in his own bubble as the President.

    What do you get when you mix Ted Stevens and Inhofe?

  • What do you get when you mix Ted Stevens and Inhofe? — ml, @7

    Inhevens? Blowing hot air down onto the pancake that’s Earth through internet tubes?

  • “I understand now why Kerry was defeated in a contest” — ml

    Apparently, you still do not.

    KERRY WON THE 2004 ELECTION. He lost THE COUNT.

    Ohio’s Bush Campaign Chair/SecState stole at least 30,000 votes in a count where supposedly GFH Bush ‘won’ by 11,000 votes.

    That’s after he took $125,000 from donors like me and others for a recount, which he then didn’t do — even when threatened with contempt of court.

    Keep on playing the Kerry-bashing card. Swiftboater Political Liars needs your help.

  • Comments are closed.