The conservative crusade against cartoon characters

Of all the things to get excited about, I’ve never quite understood why conservatives seem a little fixated on animated cartoons.

The #1 movie in the country, the animated film “Happy Feet,” is “an entertaining story about a young bird’s journey toward self-acceptance.” But to Fox News’ Neil Cavuto it’s insidious “far left” political propaganda.

Cavuto saw the movie with his sons and found it “offensive.” Cavuto objected to the fact that penguins in the movie have trouble finding food because of overfishing and oil drilling. Cavuto called the film “an animated ‘Inconvenient Truth.’ I half expected to see an animated version of Al Gore pop-up.”

Indeed, this wasn’t just a random complaint. Fox News devoted a segment to the issue of whether “Happy Feet” is “promoting an agenda.” Cavuto interviewed entertainment critic Holly McClure, who complained about the movie’s “subtle messages.” Cavuto went on to tell viewers that Hollywood was “foisting [politics] on my kids,” which was “a big-time objectionable.”

As long-time readers may recall, this is the latest in a long line of over-the-top conservative criticism (and paranoia) regarding animation.

Jerry Falwell got the ball rolling in 1999, alerting Christian parents to the dangers posed by Tinky Winky the Teletubby. Falwell wanted families to know that the purple, triangle-headed one might be part of the “homosexual agenda.”

Then, in early 2004, the Traditional Values Coalition, one of the nuttiest groups in an already nutty movement, published a “parents beware” warning about Shrek 2, which the TVC believed was part of a DreamWorks effort to help the “transgender agenda…by promoting cross dressing and transgenderism.”

A few months later, the American Family Association issued a warning to parents about the movie “Shark Tale.” The group insisted that the movie is designed to brainwash children into accepting gay rights. (The group came to this conclusion because “Shark Tale” deals with a shark who just doesn’t fit in because he doesn’t like to eat meat, like the other sharks do.)

Of course, SpongeBob SquarePants has been a subject of intense scrutiny by conservatives for years. Alan Sears of the Alliance Defense Fund seriously suggested in a book that SpongeBob SquarePants is gay, while James Dobson launched a broadside against the character in 2005.

And we certainly shouldn’t overlook the flap last year when Bush’s Education Department went a little crazy about “Postcards from Buster,” a PBS show that, in one episode, contained a brief segment featuring a lesbian couple in Vermont. (Education Secretary Margaret Spellings sent a nasty threatening letter to PBS, and most affiliates refused to air that episode.)

None of this includes the generic criticism conservatives have made about The Simpsons and South Park for years.

Note to the right: they’re just cartoons. It’s probably time for a priority check.

And who could forget that chilling moment in Bambi: “Man has entered the forest”….

….damn environmental wacko movies…..

  • “Jerry Falwell got the ball rolling in 1999, alerting Christian parents to the dangers posed by Tinky Winky the Teletubby. Falwell wanted families to know that the purple, triangle-headed one might be part of the ‘homosexual agenda.’”

    Jerry discovered this by reading homosexual literature which was speculating that Tinky was gay. Sort of like the fact that Jerry discovered that Larry Flint was defaming him (not in a legal way, mind you 😉 ) by reading Hustler.

    “Note to the right: they’re just cartoons. It’s probably time for a priority check.” – CB

    No no, they are right. These cartoons, movies and TV shows are trying to get out a message.

    Which used to be constitutional in America. I’m not sure whether it is anymore under Boy George II and his Bushite autocrats.

  • Yeah, taking kids to see “The Passion of the Christ” where a real person is brutally tortured and eventually crucified on screen, that’s way better than letting them see a cartoon where there’s any mention of mankind’s negative effects on the environment.

    Idiots.

  • And how about that Veggie Tales? We have a problem with a message if it’s left wing but not right wing?

  • Hey, attnetion Falwell, Dobson, and the other wingnutjobs – Happy Feet has an agenda. OK, now its out there and they have been alerted. DON’T SEE THE MOVIE. Problem solved.

    Maybe the wingnuts should just make their own movies so they can blast their propaganda at their children. I’m sure the free market would verify the resounding success their movies surely would experience once released to the general public. Its as simple as that – let the holy free market decide.

  • I’ve actually got to disagree with this, as I actually like cartoons that have a message and think it’s odd to pretend as if cartoons are “just cartoons”. They can certainly have a message. Like The Simpsons, every episode of which has the message: Don’t be an idiot.

    Speaking of which, here’s my review of the movie Cars, which I think had a fairly strong rightwing message:
    http://biobrain.blogspot.com/2006/06/what-i-learned-at-movies.html

    Prove me wrong, people. Prove me wrong.

  • good lord, i can just imagine the stern, obnoxious right-wing lecturing that goes on daily in the Cavuto household. poor kids. i bet they were the only ones in kindergaten who knew every Hillary and Monica joke.

  • Gee, Cavuto’s kids might grow up not agreeing with those who want to institutionalize discrimination and environmental devastation on a global scale.

    Oh, the horror.

  • Yeah, how dare cartoons try to do more than encourage our kids to want expensive toys?

    Do you think Cavuto knows he did the producers of Happy Feet a huge favour? And I guess he hated The Lorax too. So fuck him.

    I’ve actually got to disagree with this, as I actually like cartoons that have a message

    True, because any form of entertainment that doesn’t have some sort of message would be crap. I don’t even know if it is possible to create a narrative that doesn’t have a message. Any fairy tale you care to name has a moral and as you say the Simpsons tell us not to be idiots (and watch out for guys named Burns).

    The problem for the Right Wanks, that group of hypersensitive, shivering kill-joys is that the message (intentional or accidental) might contradict their view of the world. You’d think a new idea causes them physical pain the way they go on. One can hope.

    Perhaps it comes of reading Revelation too many times: All of those wierd, ambivalent symbols that can be interpreted in any number of ways must cause them to think everything has a hidden meaning. Because they distrust the outside world, that message must be hostile.

    Or perhaps they’re just whining shitheads who should be ignored.

  • I used to be a scriptwriter for animation and I remember especially on Tarzan ‘toons we had a fairly strong environmental message in the sense of people shouldn’t screw up nature. All the story cartoons had an unstated moral and it was’t about dogmatic religion it was about being good to each other and fair and not selfish.

    How did everything get so politicized?

  • As long-time readers may recall, this is the latest in a long line of over-the-top conservative criticism (and paranoia) regarding animation.

    As a professional in the animation industry, I can assure you there is a long tradition of cartoon characters attacking other cartoon characters. Cavuto v. penguins fits right in with Elmer attacking Bugs, Tom attacking Jerry, et al.

  • Cavuto: “Is Hollywood using kid’s films to promote a far left message?”

    No, dickweed. The message that we should not trash the planet is not “far left”. It is as centrist as it gets.

    Cavuto is a wingnut, so a centrist position looks to him like it is “far left”.

    And of course the far right makes tons of kids sit and listen to their hateful agenda every week in church, which I’m sure Cavuto has no problem with.

    Here’s an interesting article on a related topic:

    “…Religion’s only real commodity, after all, is its moral authority. Lose that, and we lose our credibility. Lose credibility, and we might as well close up shop…”

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20061120/cm_usatoday/whenreligionlosesitscredibility

  • OT: Good to see another Irishman on this board, Roddy. Just keep away from those damned Sasanach bridges, won’t you now. 😉

  • Well it is true.

    Penguins are having a problem getting fish to eat for various reasons. African penguins were nearly wiped out by an oil spill in 2000. Emperor penguins are having problems finding nesting areas since the Antarctic Iceshelf is melting. I could go on about the environmental problems that penguins face because of people’s activities. Marine pollution by oil tankers is a major problem.

    So tell me how that is far left? These are facts. So a movie shows the science, big whup. These are facts, not fantasy.

  • These fucking people are quite literally scared to death of every singel thing on the face of the earth. I’ve long believed that this overwhelming fear is the source of most of the loud-mouth, manly-swagger bravado they’re always throwing around, this deep existential fear that grips them every minute of every day. What a bunch of wusses. Geez.

  • Ahh, reminds me of one of the all-time-classic jokes…

    A man visits a psychiatrist, and is shown ink blots. After every ink blot, the man says things like “I see a couple fornicating”, “I see depraved sexual images”, etc.

    “Wow,” says the psychiatrist, “you certainly seem to have a preocupation with sex.”

    “Me?!” says the man, “You’re the one with all the dirty pictures!”

  • When I was in college we used to take bonghits and argue about the meaning of cartoons. The arguments made about as much sense as the rightwingers’ comments. When we got tired of talking about cartoons we would eat. I wonder if Hannity ordered some pizza when he was finished babbling.

  • Anything that is ideologically impure must be destroyed. They must keep people, words and ideas that betray the orthodoxy from reaching a larger audience. If they don’t control the message, they know individuals will be able to think for themselves.

  • It’s a cop-out so when their own children grow and actually start thinking for themselves and decide their parents were incompetent hacks at best, they can say it was the cartoons and not their parenting.

    Wing Nut philosophy: blame everyone for everything but themselves, never ever take responsibility. There is one exception, guns.

  • Sheesh. Looks like right-wingers have their panties in a twist about all sorts of light entertainment. Just a few minutes ago I stumbled across Jonah Goldberg’s sweaty freakout over last week’s episode of Battlestar Galactica, which ended with him theorizing that it wouldn’t be a bad thing if the rest of the world feared us the way humans in that show feared Cylons.

    These people have way too much time on their hands now that the elections are over, it seems.

    At the theater where I saw “Happy Feet,” by the way, we also saw a sort of mini-documentary promo for an upcoming flick that promises to blend “the best features” of claymation and computer animation. Its title? “Davie and Golimyr.” They never explicitly come out and say it during the promo–it’s all focused on the exciting technology behind the movie–but based on the clips presented only an idiot or a person with less than a basic understanding of Christian theology wouldn’t be able to tell it’s essentially the “David and Golliath” legend retold and marketed as a fun movie..for kids (“religious propaganda? what? never!”). The animation studio behind it previously created “Jonah…A Fish Story” and is part of the growing Mormon family film industry in Utah.

    Betcha the wingnuts aren’t going to try very hard to find environmental messages in that flick!

  • Gee, I thought we Americans were allowed to have agendas. I’ll have to reread that Constitution thingy. I’m glad a balanced, agenda-free company like FOX has exposed this blatant scheme.

  • CB — you’re also forgetting about the uproar over casting Ellen DeGeneres to voice Dory in “Finding Nemo.” They went bonkers about that too.

  • ***Maybe Cavuto should just stay home and show his kids DVDs of Davey and Goliath.***
    ————————————————-biggerbox

    Sorry; wouldn’t work. Davey and Goliath are “pre-Evangelical” Lutheran. It’s kinda/sorta like a wingnut version of “pre-9/11” thinking….

  • Cavuto went on to tell viewers that Hollywood was “foisting [politics] on my kids,”

    Remind me… Where were Narnia Chronicles made?

  • “Remind me… Where were Narnia Chronicles made?” – libra

    Be fair, C.S. Lewis was only trying to foist religion on his readers, not multi-party monarchy and imperialism (remember the kids were subservient to Aslan and Aslan subservient to the “Emperor over the Sea”).

    I’m sure there are conservatives who disapprove of the magic and the talking animals.

  • Be fair, C.S. Lewis was only trying to foist religion on his readers, not multi-party monarchy and imperialism — Lance, @30

    And Happy Feet — the film that Cavuto claimed Hollywood was using to foist politics on his children — that’s the one which promoted “multi-party monarchy and imperialism”? I haven’tt seen it, so I’m asking in all seriousness.

    I haven’t seen the Narnia Chronicles, either; just reading the book was enough to turn me off (and provide an explanation as to why it had not been published in Poland during the communist era, even though some other religion-motivated children’s books had been)

  • “And Happy Feet — the film that Cavuto claimed Hollywood was using to foist politics on his children — that’s the one which promoted “multi-party monarchy and imperialism”? I haven’tt seen it, so I’m asking in all seriousness.” – libra

    Nope, I meant that the political system of Narnia which is a Imperial/Monarchical feudalism is not “thing” C.S. Lewis was pushing. That is, the purpose of the movie is not “political” it is religious/moral. And yes I consider the two things seperate.

    Sorry to hear you did not like the book because it’s a great series. It’s actually “Prince Caspian” that is the most blatently and annoyingly preachy of the books (everybody should follow Lucy, Lucy has to convince her older siblings to do the hard thing not the easy thing, no one can see Aslan until they follow Lucy’s lead, yada yada yada). As an adult you should take the time to read the books with a grain of salt but still able to enjoy them.

  • I’m surprised the wingnuts aren’t in a lather about that notorious cross-dresser, Bugs Bunny. And Elmer Fudd is clearly gay — look at how much he likes opera, fer crying out loud, not to mention that he blushes like a teenaged girl when Daffy Duck smooches him.

    In Bugs’ immortal words: “What a maroon! What an ignoranimus!”

  • Then, in early 2004, the Traditional Values Coalition, one of the nuttiest groups in an already nutty movement, published a “parents beware” warning about Shrek 2, which the TVC believed was part of a DreamWorks effort to help the “transgender agenda…by promoting cross dressing and transgenderism.”

    These guys obviously have never seen Milton Berle…

    …or, maybe, they’ll start a campaign to exhume him for a little post-mortem bashing…

    – PonB

  • Remember the rampant conservative promotion of the other penguin movie, “March of the Penguins,” as “proof of intelligent design” and a lesson on the value of monogamy in raising children (despite the fact that the parents are hardly ever together and go off to seek new partners the next year)?

    Forget animation, penguin message movies are fine as long as they are straight, family oriented, hard working conservative penguins. Who clearly won’t give a damn when the polar ice caps melt from global warming.

  • Is it your position that parents should not worry about what their children watch?

    How to argue such disingenuity? Cartoons target children. Kids are especially susceptible to propaganda. People who don’t want their children exposed to this propaganda have a right to point this out and to warn other parents.

    Now, if we had conservative things aimed at children like prayer in school or cartoons where one of your favored group is diminished, would you expect that no left group would complain?

    What about all the left groups who complained about the messages in Lion King and Little Mermain? What about Barbie, GI Joe, and violent toys? John Kerry was especially eloquent on this subject in 1971. What about the racist cartoons of the twenties and thirties? Why don’t we see those anymore? What about Speedy Gonzalez?

    This is an old trick: You’re right (in this case you caught me politicizing cartoons aimed at children) Instead of arguing the merits, I will mock the fact that you even brought it up.

    I just can’t believe you fall for this stuff? Hypocrite.

    Asymmetric

  • Sorry for the posting twice. This may be hard to believe but some parents think raising their children is very important. In fact, some may think it’s more important than global warming.

  • “This may be hard to believe but some parents think raising their children is very important. In fact, some may think it’s more important than global warming.”

    Sorry, but this is a really stupid statement. One of the responsibilities ALL parents have is ensuring a livable world for their children. It doesn’t matter what principles you raise your children with, if they aren’t going to have breathable air, fertile land, potable water, or available food then it doesn’t matter WHAT their values are.

    The ultra conservative nuts should focus on the values that matter — care and kindness toward others and being proper “stewards” of the earth (their word not mine).

    How about spending less time worrying about what Hollywood produces — you have the power to control what your children watch, if you actually take time to raise your children instead of leaving it to day care. And leave me and my children to watch what *I* think is appropriate for us. Stop trying to force your moral compass on me.

  • My God, that’s insane! As a kid I loved the film Ferngully (which with time revealed itself to be somewhat bollocks), which had an obvious environmental message (don’t chop down ALL the rainforest). My childhood wasn’t tainted by left-wing propoganda, I simply enjoyed a (Naff) film and it reinforced a message that should be commonsense to anyone, even republicans.

    How is SPONGEbob gay? He’s a Sponge. He is camp, but a negative role-model? You’d have to be a pretty crap parent for your kids to be looking to 2-dimensional characters for developmental guidance.

  • Any clear minded american should be angry about this. It’s confused americans like Cavuto who help reinforce the negative view the rest of the world has against all americans. Coming from outside the U.S (New Zealand), articles like this make it all too easy for me to make rash assumptions about the general intelligence and common sense of the average american. I know it’s unfair to judge all americans by the attitudes of a few, but these simpletons seem to be given so much airtime. Why aren’t they ignored? How could they possibly have a support base?

    Their entitled to their views, but would those views be so extreme without the help of exhaustive debate?

  • JanetMermaid said: “How about spending less time worrying about what Hollywood produces — you have the power to control what your children watch, if you actually take time to raise your children instead of leaving it to day care. And leave me and my children to watch what *I* think is appropriate for us. Stop trying to force your moral compass on me.”

    Noone is forcing anything on anyone. I find it hilarious how much leftist want to make their opinions as public as possible, but the second a conservative voices his views, he’s “forcing his moral compass” on you. The guy reviewing the film put that out there so that anyone who thinks like he does won’t have to spend $10 and an hour and a half of thier life on something they won’t like anyway.

  • JanetMermaid said: “How about spending less time worrying about what Hollywood produces — you have the power to control what your children watch, if you actually take time to raise your children instead of leaving it to day care. And leave me and my children to watch what *I* think is appropriate for us. Stop trying to force your moral compass on me.”

    Noone is forcing anything on anybody. I think it’s hilarious how leftists want their opinions made as public as possible, but the second a conservative voices his views, he’s “forcing his moral compass” on you. The reviewer wrote what he felt about the film so that people who would agree with him won’t have to spend $10 and an hour and a half of their lives to sit through something that they woudn’t like anyway.

  • Stunted population growth and food shortages in penguin colonies caused by fishing and drilling is not a “leftist view”, it’s a fact. This isn’t a debatable issue which someone took objection to. It’s not left versus right. It’s someone confusing entertainment (with a real world non-political message) with propoganda.

    What about ads for sun-block? Is that leftist propoganda? Or recycling stickers on trash cans? People waste too much effort on the political clasification of information rather than disscusing the issues. The Left doesn’t own the concept of environmental responsibility. Bears shit in the woods, thus enriching the soil with fertiliser and helping plants grow. Are Bears Leftist?

  • I love all the rude comments from the so called “tolerant” left. The liberal left always rants about being open minded but then viciously insults people they disagree with. All of this comes on the day the DrudgeReport and others are exposing Al Gores movie as junk science. Todays headline “Quietest Hurricane season in a Decade”.

    Thanks Cavuto, I wont be wasting my money on this left wing propaganda. Why cant the film maker just be honest about what the films about? Thanks again Fox news!

    At least you liberal bigots have something to put next to your VHS copy of FurnGully! Did they even bother to put that on DVD? LOL!

  • Hey Davey!

    I’ll admit that there are a few scientists who remain to be sold on the details of global climate change – like how many hurricanes it will cause or how fast it will happen, but that doesn’t make anything in An Inconvenient Truth “junk science.”

    I double-triple-super-duper dare you to find me a peer reviewed journal article that found evidence to support the hypothesis that Global Climate Change is not going to cost us lives, ecosystems and property damage, or that it isn’t man-made.

    No, wait. I defy you to find me a peer reviewed journal article that “debunks” global warming. Because guess what? There isn’t one. All the scientifically illiterate pinheads in the world won’t conjure one up out of thin air. And they won’t turn scientists who agree with the IPCC on everything else but how many hurricanes the phenomenon will cause into silver bullets.

    Get your facts straight.

  • I thought the message of “Happy Feet” was that we’re all supposed to show our individuality by dancing in lockstep with everybody else.

    Regarding SpongeBob — at the time that was going on, there were more than a few newspaper articles with headlines that sounded as though people were claiming the character was gay, and then you read the article and it was simply saying that he was _popular_ among gays. I literally saw exactly that happen more than once — and it is probably that “false alarm” that was picked up by the pundits (right and left).

    As for Tinky Winky — it isn’t the fact that he’s purple. It isn’t the fact that his symbol is a triangle. It isn’t the fact that he carries a purse. It isn’t the fact that he speaks with an effeminate male voice. It’s _all of those together_.

    I can make a character who is tan in color, has a red armband, and a funny little mustache. None of those separately would strongly suggest Nazis, but put them together and they would.

  • Clarification on Spongebob comment —

    What I mean is, that is what started all the muttering about “people are saying he’s gay” — without anyone actually making the claim. _Then_ the televangelists picked up on it. “What’s that? The character is gay?”

    At work one day a bunch of women were sitting around talking about how ridiculous it was that people were claiming the character was gay. I asked them what they were talking about and they pointed me to an article in the Wall Street Journal. I read the article and all it said was that gays seemed to like the character. The whole conversation in the lunchroom was based on them having read a _headline_ that was ambiguous.

  • Lisa said – “No, wait. I defy you to find me a peer reviewed journal article that “debunks” global warming. Because guess what? There isn’t one. All the scientifically illiterate pinheads in the world won’t conjure one up out of thin air. And they won’t turn scientists who agree with the IPCC on everything else but how many hurricanes the phenomenon will cause into silver bullets.”

    *ahem*

    http://www.realclimate.org/

    Global warming theory’s predictions for 2000 were off by 300%. That’s about as close to disproof as science ever really gets.

  • I have often found that liberals and conservatives need something to crusade against on a constant basis, otherwise they turn into pumpkins.

    It seems that people are missing the point. No moderate individual would deny that feeding an agenda to a child, positive or negative, in the form of a movie length or show length commercial creates concerns. Mainly, the concern that a message is being fed to my children…and do I want that message in thier heads. I can answer yes or no, and that is the issue.

    The problem here, is that most would say…..meh. Seems harmless to me would probably be the most common conclusion. So, by complaining, the political terrorists, both liberal and conservative, the true enemies of america have once again shown that they are the reason that this country has been in trouble for over 200 years.

    Oh, wait, did I just slip into political terrorism myself? Seems I let my emotions get the best of me. Seems to be alot of that lately. And a lack of self respect.

    In other words, political extremists in this country should probably consider taking great care in crusades that make them look foolish, tired and fanatical. Far left and far right is, well, far removed.

    Nuff said.

  • Welcome to our website for you World of Warcraft Gold,Wow Gold,Cheap World of Warcraft Gold,cheap wow gold,buy cheap wow gold,real wow gold,sell wow gold, …
    Here wow gold of 1000 gold at $68.99-$80.99 ,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy wow gold,sell world of warcraft gold(wow gold),buy euro gold wow Cheap wow gold,cheapest wow gold store …Guild wars Gold buy euro gold wow wow gold–buy cheap wow gold,sell wow gold.welcome to buy cheap wow gold–cheap, easy, wow gold purchasing.World of Warcraft,wow gold Super …
    We can have your wow gold,buy wow gold,wow gold game,world of warcraft gold, wow Gold Cheap wow, Cheap wow gold,world of warcraft gold deal,Cheap WOW Gold …

    Welcome to our website for you World of Warcraft Gold,Wow Gold,Cheap World of Warcraft Gold,wow gold,buy cheap wow gold,real wow gold,sell wow gold, …
    Here wow gold of 1000 gold at $68.99-$80.99,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy wow gold,sell world of warcraft gold(wow gold),buy gold wow lightninghoof instock Cheap wow gold,cheapest wow gold store …Guild wars Gold wow gold–buy cheap wow gold,sell wow gold.welcome to buy cheap wow gold–cheap, easy, wow gold purchasing.World of Warcraft,wow gold Super …
    Wow gold- Gold for buy gold wow lightninghoof instock EU-Server: …wow Gold EU: starting from 84,99?; 3000 WoW Gold EU: starting from 119,99?. wow Gold- Leveling Services: …
    We can have your wow Gold,buy wow Gold,wow Gold game,wow gold, Cheap wow Gold, Cheap World of Warcraft Gold,world of warcraft gold deal,buy cheap wow gold,Cheap WOW Gold …

    Here wow Gold of 1000 gold at $68.99-$80.99,World Of Warcraft Gold,buy wow Gold,sell world of warcraft gold(wow gold),Cheap wow gold,cheapest World of Warcraft Gold store

  • Did I mention that on Sunday I cut my hair short and colored it fire engine red?
    The bottle may have said “Red Birch” but the reality is Sharon Osborne, color that does not live in nature, sharp, spikey RED.
    Years ago, before I started feeling adult and responsible, I had red hair, and then after a while I got into the natural look and being low key (this can be hard, as you know if you know me).
    This evolution required less unique hair, well-tailored black clothes, and the constant practice of active listening(not always successful.)
    Didn’t do me much good, did it?
    Joking aside (if it is possible to do that when your hair edges toward whore red), my new look feels good for right now.

  • Comments are closed.