Atlantic ranks the most influential figures in American history

Any top 100 list is intended to be a conversation piece. It’s an entirely subjective exercise to name the top 100 best movies, or football teams, or albums, so when some magazine pulls a list together, it’s supposed to spur debate.

With this in mind, The Atlantic has a cover story ranking the top 100 “most influential figures” in American history, compiled by 10 prominent historians. The magazine explained that the instructions were intentionally vague: “[W]e intentionally defined influence loosely — as a person’s impact, for good or ill, both on his or her own era and on the way we live now. This allowed for a certain creativity in the selection process, and it had the advantage of leaving the harder work of definition to the historians themselves.”

It’s kind of fun to explore various angles — the power of pop culture, the problem of value judgments, the question of identity politics — and I think the top 10 are solid choices.

1 Abraham Lincoln: He saved the Union, freed the slaves, and presided over America’s second founding.

2 George Washington: He made the United States possible — not only by defeating a king, but by declining to become one himself.

3 Thomas Jefferson: The author of the five most important words in American history: “All men are created equal.”

4 Franklin Delano Roosevelt: He said, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself,” and then he proved it.

5 Alexander Hamilton: Soldier, banker, and political scientist, he set in motion an agrarian nation’s transformation into an industrial power.

6 Benjamin Franklin: The Founder-of-all-trades — scientist, printer, writer, diplomat, inventor, and more; like his country, he contained multitudes.

7 John Marshall: The defining chief justice, he established the Supreme Court as the equal of the other two federal branches.

8. Martin Luther King Jr.: His dream of racial equality is still elusive, but no one did more to make it real.

9 Thomas Edison: It wasn’t just the lightbulb; the Wizard of Menlo Park was the most prolific inventor in American history.

10 Woodrow Wilson: He made the world safe for U.S. interventionism, if not for democracy.

From there, however, the list offers some questionable choices.

Chief among them, Ronald Reagan came in at number 17. I’m not entirely sure if I’d put him in the top 100 at all, but 17th? Above Thomas Paine, Alexander Graham Bell, and Earl Warren? How’s that exactly? Given the reasoning — Reagan, The Atlantic said, led a “conservative realignment” — Barry Goldwater should have been on the list but wasn’t.

For that matter, Dwight Eisenhower was number 28. On a list of military generals, sure, but more influential Americans of all time? Nearly 20 places higher than Lyndon Johnson, whose influence — on civil rights, Great Society, Vietnam — still reverberates today?

There’s plenty to chew on here.

* Bill Gates was number 53, and was one of only three living people to make the list.

* Jackie Robinson was one of two athletes to make the list (number 35) — Babe Ruth as the other (number 75).

* There were two musicians on the list, Elvis Presley (66) and Louis Armstrong (79).

* Mark Twain, at number 16, was the highest ranking writer.

* Ralph Nader, who gave us seatbelts and President George W. Bush, came in at number 96.

There’s some fun stuff to consider, so take a look at let me know what you think.

Amazing what Reagan’s vast army of publicists and wealthy Republicans (who must be missing their old party about now) can do to splash that lying, ineffective, wasteful senile old has-been actor’s name all over the place. When his publicists die off or go senile themselves, I doubt you’ll see any more reference to Reagan than you do now to Warren G. Harding.

  • Oh, for a minute I thought number seven was “Josh Marshall”

    I mean…I read Talking Points Memo as well, but I didn’t think he was *that* influential…….

    My mistake.

  • Missing from the list: Madison Avenue (1920-??), without whom we wouldn’t be able to smear opponents or even conduct elections.

  • Babe Ruth as the other (number 75).

    Why Babe Ruth and not Muhammad Ali? Jackie Robinson seems a no-brainer, but Babe Ruth? Very odd.

    Dwight Eisenhower was number 28. On a list of military generals, sure, but more influential Americans of all time?

    Agreed…McCarthur should had a lasting impact on Japan. His influence is still felt in many ways there…or was this an America only influence type of deal…

    On a completely different tangent, what about George Lucas? Say what you want about the latest Star Wars films, the first set were and still are tremendously influential. Blue screen filming was made commerically viable by Lucas. There isn’t a special effects film made today that wasn’t influenced by that revolution.

  • I thought it was freakish that Donald Douglas and the people behind Boeing weren’t on the list. Imagine America without leadership in aviation – oh wait, Shrub’s working on that, too….

  • Reagan is indeed misplaced. His “revolution” has only been in place for a little over 20 years. He should appear on the list, however, maybe in the lower 100.

    Babe Ruth is a good choice. He is the template for a sports superhero that so dominates today’s culture.

    Nat Turner is an important individual, but his impact on American history is not massive.

  • Eisenhower is on the list because of the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act of 1956, which authorized planning/building/funding of the US highway system as we know it today.

    I’m sure Reagan is on so high because he was “single-handedly responsible for the destruction of communism”(my quote, with sarcasm implied).

  • Mary Baker Eddy is an interesting choice, and her ranking is deserved, although perhaps no immediately apparent. Many of the “New Thought” religous movements trace back to Mary Baker Eddy. Even some of the mainly fundamentalist mega church preachers (Joel Osteen) borrow from the self-healing and self-improvement themes in the “New Thought” movement.

  • The blight of Cheney, Rumsfield, Gonzales, and Bush have left their reckless muddy footprints all over our constitution and their collective negative impact on our freedoms, international standing and economic well being is beyond imagining.

  • Reagon? Not even a blip,

    As far as influence over the 230 years, the first thirty names should be from the “founding fathers”, the next 70 should be of people who started, continued and fought wars. The last 50 years of popular culture and sport shouldn’t even make the list in terms of influence.

  • Didn’t the History Channel do something like this last year? I think the HC program was based on viewer voting though, and I came to the conclusion that many HC viewers were creepy.

    This list isn’t as slanted (left or right) as I’ve come to expect from such lists, so well done for that. I just think the whole idea of most influential/infamous/sexiest/smartest/whateverests people has been beaten to death twice over.

    And I must note that they cheat by counting both Lewis and Clark and The Wright Brothers as one person.

  • The vastly-overrated Woodrow Wilson needs to be removed from the pantheons as the political failure and racist pig that he was.

    Described by his contemporaries as a “narrow-minded Southern bigot,” Wilson presided over the extension of Jim Crow policy from the Southern States throughout the country through his imposition of these policies on the Federal government. It took 50 years for the government to recover from this, and we still deal with the aftereffects (see Republicans, election strategies, et al).

    He was a political repressor, getting the Sedition Act passed in 1917 and using it aggressively to stifle legal dissent from his war. He okayed a campaign of vilification of things and people German during 1917-18 that was only equaled by the internment of the Japanese-Americans in 1942. My own grandfather’s barn was burned down by his neighbors in 1918 for the crime of having the name Weist – which was particularly ironic, given that he was the grandson of a member of the Congress of Frankfurt in the Revolution of 1848 who was a dedicated anti-Prussian.Most of the Germans who were harassed through this propaganda orgy were either people who had left Germany to get away from the Prussians, or the children of those who had.

    He was a complete failure in his “political goals” in entering WW1. They had nothing to do with the real reason we did, which was to protect Wall Street’s investment in British and French war bonds and war loans. In fact, he was as racist a hypocrite with his “Four Freedoms” and “14 Points” at Versailles, as he was with his domestic Jim Crow policies. The Americans were quite happy to go along with support of “the white man’s burden” at Versailles, divvying up the Middle East between Britain and France and sowing the seeds for the whirlwind we are harvesting there today. The denial of opportunity for nationhood for non-white colonized people – while supporting nationhood for “repressed minorities” in the old Austro-Hungarian Empire – led directly to the wars of Vietnam (among many others of the past 60 years).

    The truth is, the only presidents worse than Woodrow Wilson were Herbert Hoover and the current moron.

    It’s time for “progressives” to turn their brain cells on when it comes to looking at this worthless southern pig. “Progressive” is not a word that can be applied to him.

  • On a completely different tangent, what about George Lucas?

    Funny, I thought the same thing. As it turns out, Lucas wasn’t particularly close to making the list, but he did come in 12th on the historians’ list of living influential Americans. Steven Spielberg, for what it’s worth, came in sixth, but also wasn’t close to cracking the top 100.

  • The “Reagan revolution” seems to consist of the primacy of propaganda, the ascendancy of reich-wing hate speech, and the complete immorality of passing on the federal government’s agregate debt to taxpayers that aren’t even born yet. “Great Communicator”, indeed. He’s more like the “Great Demagogue”, if you ask me.

    In this respect, yes, he is indeed one of the more influential creeps ever to slither across the American stage.

  • It was not Ralph Nader who gave us President George W. Bush, it was our antiquated 18th century electoral system. Blaming Nader for our nation’s failure to deliver the duly elected president is a self-serving exercise that excuses our own responsibility to fix it.

    Rather than harp on about a legitimate 3rd party candidate, maybe you should instead criticize the laws that actually bore this embarrassment of a President.

  • Reagan belongs on the list because it will take decades to undo the damage he’s done to American political discourse, if it can be undone at all. Without Reagan’s (entirely political) success, it would be inconceivable that an amiable nonentity like G. W. Bush could aspire to the White House on the strength of a sunny disposition and cartoonish policy positions disguised as ordinary-guy bluntness or that the country would be governed by people who hate government (or profess to).

  • In a list with Nat Turner, John Brown and Abe Lincoln I would actually expect to see the author of Southern resistence, John_C._Calhoun former Vice President under two President (John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson) who became a Senator and the leading voice of Southern apologistics for slavery who laid the kindling for the Civil War.

  • What no foreigners had impact on American history?? Geez, I though Bin Laden would have easily made the list, what about Hitler or Emperor Hirohito. I mean we did actually invent and use the atom bomb because of of a war started by several of these characters. I guess King George III had nothing to do with our history except to tax the F out of us until we decided enough was enough. Christopher Columbus, who’s that ?? And that guy named Saddam, he only ‘provoked’ two wars, chump change compared to Melville & Foster.

    Without any of those characters the history of the US would be quiet different.

    Maybe I am reading this wrong, but it does say “The most influential figures in American history”.

    Terrible list.

  • “Palmer Raids” Wilson #10? A man who hated Italians and blacks? The one whose wife presided over the last years of his administration following his stroke??

    Please. Let’s make Satchmo #10. As for Wilson; Cleveland was a better president and Van Buren of greater historic consequence. Where are they on the list?

  • In the spirit of yesterday’s Sunday discussion – I would include Eugene McCarthy. Imagine what the US would look like today if he hadn’t knocked Johnson out of the 1968 race and Nixon hadn’t become President.

  • Lists are lame, and the main reason for the fall of civilization. I can give you a whole list of reasons why…

  • McCarthy didn’t knock LBJ out of the ’68 race. He had already decided to not run by the winter of that year.

  • “segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit”
    – Woodrow Wilson

    Wilson single-handedly undid any racial progress that had been made at the federal level since Reconstruction. If I had to pick a worst president, it would certainly be Wilson. But, I guess that also means he belongs on the list. BTW, a good book for the Kick Wilson club is “Lies My Teacher Told Me” by James Loewen. It has a very good section about the controversial nature of Wilson.

  • I actually think Bill Gates should make the list twice. Love it or hate it, his Microsoft legacy has been huge.

    But the B&M Gates Foundation is also a remarkable achievement. Now that he is personally focusing more energy on it, I think he’ll pull a Babe Ruth – basically follow an already respectable ‘career’ with an even more impressive one.

    That said, I still think he is kind of a dick – a feeling no doubt hightened by a deep seated belief that no one _except_ me deserves to be so rich…

    -jjf

  • Gates deserves to be on the list for setting the general state of personal computing back at least a decade with inferior products while maximizing profit for himself by imitating, squashing or purchasing the inventions of others. As for the B&M foundation, see Andrew Carnegie, who set the gold standard of philanthropy as elixer for the guilty conscious, at #20. (I sure hope this comment doesn’t put me in the hate Gates camp, but I do hope he reads it).

  • Comments are closed.