Quinnipiac’s ‘National Thermometer’

Plenty of polls can tell us who has a high approval rating, and plenty more can show which political figures can beat other political figures in hypothetical election match-ups, but I’ve always found Quinnipiac’s “National Thermometer” poll a bit more useful. The poll, released quarterly, measures what the public feels generally towards various leaders.

The newest results suggest the conservative drive to tear down soon-to-be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi hasn’t been particularly effective. At the same time, the effort to smear Sen. John Kerry was largely successful.

House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi, who ranked last in Quinnipiac University’s quarterly reading of voter sentiment about national leaders September 5, has dramatically improved her standing. […]

The survey, taken the week after the Democrats won back Congress, asks voters to rate the warmth of their feelings for leaders on a scale of 0 – 100. Speaker-elect Pelosi’s rating has jumped from a 34.7 mean temperature in September to 46.7, slightly behind New York Sen. Hillary Clinton’s 49.

“In September, most Americans did not know enough about U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, and those who did didn’t like what they knew. Now, perhaps because everyone likes a winner, she has increased her standing with the American people. And only about a third of Americans say they don’t know enough about her to have an opinion,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

It’s a pleasant surprise. In the months leading up to the election, the GOP establishment and several Republican campaigns tried repeatedly to make Pelosi’s name synonymous with “out-of-control liberal.” What’s more, the media was less than kind to Pelosi the week after the election, offering the public bizarre reports on her appearance and overheated coverage of her role in the House Majority Leader race. And Pelosi still saw her standing with the public go up considerably.

John Kerry is probably thinking, “If only I were that fortunate.”

In the thermometer poll, 20 nationally-recognized political figures were included. Kerry finished dead last, and was the only pol to have a total score below 40 (respondents give a rating from 0 to 100). It suggests the often-ridiculous coverage of Kerry’s botched joke had an effect — his rating was 46.3 in March and is 39.6 now.

It’s not fair, and Kerry clearly deserves better, but the right and the media have sullied his name. My sense is that running again in 2008 would be a mistake — most Dems in the Quinnipiac poll were lukewarm on Kerry, and Republicans and independents were hostile. At this point, I hope he skips the race.

Regardless, here’s the top 10 most highly rated political leaders, with the number of poll respondents who weren’t sure in parentheses:

1. Rudolph Giuliani – 64.2. (9)

2. Sen. Barack Obama 58.8 (41)

3. Sen. John McCain 57.7 (12)

4. Condoleezza Rice – 56.1 (7)

5. Bill Clinton – 55.8 (1)

6. Sen. Joseph Lieberman – 52.7 (16)

7. NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg – 51.1 (44)

8. John Edwards – 49.9 (20)

9. Sen. Hillary Clinton – 49 (1)

10. N.M. Gov. Bill Richardson – 47.7 (65)

With 2008 in mind, Giuliani’s ratings have to be considered wildly inflated. The poll shows him polling well with Dems, which would end as soon as he started running to the right to get the GOP nomination. Giuliani also remains very popular with the Republican base, which would also vanish once they learn about his less-conservative policy positions on social issues.

Obama’s popularity is interesting, but it’s worth noting that 41% still don’t know enough about him to have an opinion. That’s surprisingly high, but more importantly, it’s also a potential problem for the senator’s presidential campaign — for a large segment of the population, he’s a blank slate that the right will be anxious to fill.

For what it’s worth, Al Gore finished at number 14, a bit better than Bush, with a 44.9 rating. What’s more, his numbers have been on the rise this year. (John Kerry, take note — by sitting out a cycle, a guy can really rehabilitate his image.)

Oh, and then there’s the Big Dog. As Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said, “Former President Clinton remains more popular than his wife and much better thought of by the American public than the current occupant of the Oval Office.”

“Former President Clinton remains more popular than his wife and much better thought of by the American public than the current occupant of the Oval Office.” – Peter Brown

Well, of course he does.

I’m surprised that Edwards is so low and Richardson is so high.

I’m surprised that LIEberman is not in the dog house.

Interesting that EVERYBODY knows Bill and Hillary. Kind of suggests that Hillary’s numbers can’t really go down, unlike any Republican’t nominee. Which is why I’m always curious why we get comments here about how unelectable Hillary is and thus how bad she is for even thinking about running and thus how the commentor will of course not vote for Hillary because she’s bad because some yahoo in Georgia is not going to vote for her.

  • Obama is going to be tough to beat, anyone who goes against him is going to be branded a racist (unless it’s Condolleeza of course).

    Gore is still suffering from the pounding the media gave him in 2000.

  • It’s not fair, and Kerry clearly deserves better

    You know, despite his painful to watch delivery, I would have probably agreed with you until recently. But in the course of my research for my soon-to-be-finished book on energy policy and a global warming solution (and yes, there is one) I discovered that Kerry enthusiastically led the charge to cancel funding for one of the most promising technologies to come down the pike. To read his pompous pronouncements on global warming today, along with his ludicrous suggestions on how to solve the problem, has guaranteed him a special place in my book as an example of how appallingly wrongheaded politicians can be. From now on, whatever slings and arrows Kerry suffers, deserved or not, will not overtax my tear ducts.

  • “I gotta say, this business about Obama being a serious 2008 candidate is all a fantasy. Perhaps VP, but there is 0 chance he is our next pres.” – MinorRipper

    Well, the most successful route to the Presidency is through the Vice Presidency. And the best way to get the nomination to the Vice Presidency is to bring to the ticket some portion of the electorate the Presidential nominee is weak in. So I would say Obama is going about this the right way.

  • This is a very weird poll in that it measures “degree of favorability,” not percentage approval, and it does so without context. Condi’s high ranking could thus be for her accomplishments as a minority woman rather than her performance in this administration. I don’t see any relationship between this poll and viability as a presidential candidate. It seems to have more in common with American Idol voting.

  • The Bill Richardson number is very interesting. High favorablity and a high number of people who aren’t sure. Does this mean lots of favorable potential? Or lot’s of softness in his favorablity rating? Or both?

  • Comments are closed.