Federal officials break up alleged bombing plot in Chicago area

It’s always encouraging when law-enforcement officials catch a would-be bomber.

A Muslim convert who talked about his desire to wage jihad against civilians was charged Friday in a plot to set off hand grenades at a shopping mall during the Christmas rush, authorities said.

Investigators said Derrick Shareef, 22, was acting alone and never actually obtained any grenades.

“He fixed on a day of December 22nd on Friday … because it was the Friday before Christmas and thought that would be the highest concentration of shoppers that he could kill and injure,” said Robert Grant, the agent in charge of the Chicago FBI office.

Officials said Shareef had been under investigation since September, when he told an acquaintance that “he wanted to commit acts of violent jihad against targets in the United States as well as commit other crimes.” The acquaintance immediately informed the FBI, officials said.

Apparently, Shareef planned to set off four hand grenades in garbage cans at a shopping mall in Rockford, about 90 miles northwest of Chicago. Officials said other “potential targets,” which Shareef allegedly discussed, included government facilities such as courthouses and city hall.

He was taken into custody after meeting an undercover agent in a parking lot to trade stereo speakers for hand grenades and a handgun.

Obviously, this sounds like very good news, and kudos go out to the federal officials who caught this guy before he could do any real damage. That said, I hate to sound cynical, but I feel like we’ve been here before.

In August, for example, we learned of a “plot” to hijack 10 airplanes bound for the U.S. from the U.K. The initial reports sounded extremely serious, but subsequent details suggested the “plot” was not quite what it appeared to be.

It was hardly an isolated incident. When Abu Zubaydah was captured in Pakistan in March 2002, the president described him as al Queda’s chief of operations and emphasized the significance of his capture. Bush was wrong. The plot to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge wasn’t quite what it was cracked up to be. Jose Padilla was not actually prepared to detonate a dirty bomb in DC. The “Miami 7,” described by Dick Cheney as “a very real threat,” turned out to be more of a joke than a danger.

The result, unfortunately, is the boy-who-cried-wolf problem. When one of these stories is exaggerated, it’s an accident. When it happens repeatedly, one has to start wondering if perhaps Bush administration officials simply do not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

I’m not saying this Shareef guy in Chicago was harmless. It’s likely he really planned to do harm, I’m glad he was caught before anyone got hurt, and I give law enforcement officials all the credit in the world for doing what they do. But hearing about another success story now leads me to wonder, “What are we going to learn about this in a couple of days that makes it seem a lot less serious?”

Just a few years ago, this would have been considered the height of cynicism. Now, given the administration’s stunning record of acting in bad faith, it’s practically irresponsible not to wonder.

Post Script: By the way, remember how many times Bush mocked the notion that effective counter-terrorism relies on intelligence gathering and law-enforcement operations?

Update: Lance reminds us in comments that Shareef was caught without NSA warrantless wiretapping, too.

Well, let’s not forget to emphasize that what caught him was simple police work, a tip to authorities from an acquaintance, and a sting operation.

No NSA warrantless wiretapping. No wars in other countries. No diminishment of Americans’ rights just because the terrorists hate them.

  • No NSA warrantless wiretapping. No wars in other countries. No diminishment of Americans’ rights just because the terrorists hate them.

    Excellent point, Lance. I should have mentioned that.

    In fact, that reminds me — didn’t Bush mock the notion that law enforcement is the best way to prevent terrorism?

  • Well, if he was really meeting someone to get hand grenades and a handgun, it’s likely he wasn’t doing so to ‘get them off the streets’

  • No offense to the people involved, but it doesn’t take great police work to catch someone bragging about a crime, it takes concerned citizens intuned enough to call the police or FBI and let them do the job they were trained to do.

    My point is alienating Muslims and/or anyone who might have this sort of information is foolhardy at best. But that is exactly what we are doing and doing it with vigor.

  • NononemOuse,
    I think the point was that like in Miami, maybe someone pushed this guy to get the grenades. I thought in Miami that the FBI pushed the guys far enough to make arrests and that without the FBI, the guys would have just went on bragging about doing this or that, no real threat. Entrapment.

    I mean seriously, speakers for grenades and a handgun, if that doesn’t sound suspicious.

  • I get the feeling that the FBI saved this guy from blowing his own damn hands off, well done for getting another idiot off the streets. (Tho’ I did not know a hand grenade was a weapon of mass destruction.)

    I wonder how (if at all) the ReThugs will try to spin this? “Ya see? The Democratic party took the majority and… uh…something bad almost happend,” doesn’t have much punch and their buddies in the retail industry might want them to shut up lest the story depress sales. However, I bet they’re pretty pissed that this happened after the election.

    I also wonder what will happen to this man. Regular jail and a trial or the black hole of Romania and never seen again? (Where are the “Miami 7” for that matter?)

  • You know why I think this story is more or less legit? There’s no election on the immediate horizon. That’s why.

  • Just how readily available ARE hand grenades in America?

    And does anyone really think you can trade stereo speakers for explosives?

  • There is no evidence that the feds are hyping this or blowing thing out of proportion. Had this been a story about some guy who was arrested after telling an acquaintance that he wanted to whack his wife no one would have blinked an eye.

    Also, keep in mind that the arrest was announced by Patrick Fitzgerald. Does the name ring a bell? I think we would all agree that he has extremely good credibility.

    The only part of the story that has me scratching my head is this.

    Shareef, who was born in the United States, was charged with one count of attempting to damage or destroy a building by fire or explosion and one count of attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction.

    When did a hand grenade become a weapon of mass destruction? My problem is not with the charge, but with which would classifiy a hand grenade this way.

  • The corollary to moral of the “Boy Who Cried Wolf” is that sometimes, there really is a wolf.

  • One thing that this arrest illustrates is the fact that when they do break up a terror plot — regardless of how severe a threat it may have really posed — they’re proud of themselves and they tell us about it. So what I want to know is, what terrorist plots have they broken up by using their unconstitutional warrantless wiretaps, or by kidnapping and torturing the shit out of one or the other hapless Muslim? This Chicago incident is one more proof that If there really were any such success stories, we would’ve heard about them almost as soon as they happened.

  • “Excellent point, Lance. I should have mentioned that.” – CB

    Glowing with a warmth that dispells the cold of a Virginia winter 😉

  • And does anyone really think you can trade stereo speakers for explosives?

    Depends on the quality of the speaker. Some high-end Genesis speakers might tempt any arms dealer…

  • Kudos to law enforcement, if indeed this guy is guilty of attempting to pull something like this off. Another knucklehead off the streets.

    One thing that REALLY bugs me, though, is the disgusting double standard that the media takes towards cases like this. Just imagine if this guy was not a Muslim but instead a white-supremacist. How would the media handle such a case? Would be headline news at every single media outlet?

    Guess what, you don’t have to imagine it. There have been more than a dozen cases since 9/11 of terrorists caught with plans to use explosives, heavy-duty weaponry, and REAL WMDs (stuff a little bit worse than hand grenades) against American citizens and our government.

    Just last WEEK, a guy in Tennessee was sentenced for trying to procure C4 explosives and sarin gas to use against Congress. He had long standing ties to Neo-Nazi groups. Utterly ignored by the press, except for mentions in local media. Just imagine if this guy was a Muslim. Imagine the attention from the press and the outrage from the right-wing noise machine. Just think about it for one second, and you’ll see just how sick our discourse has become.

    Here’s a link:

    http://www.jacksonsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061129/NEWS01/611290311/1002

    Like I said, there are many more examples just like this. It just seems nuts to me to define terrorism as that which can only be perpetrated by Muslims. Islamic extremists certainly are a real threat, but Neo-nazis and their allies are just as dangerous, if not more so.

  • Did you know another terrorist was convicted last week of threatening to blow up government buildings (specifically Congress). He also attempted to purchase a weapon from undercover agents.

    The 40-year-old divorced father of two told agents his dream was to set off a dirty bomb in Washington D-C while the House and the Senate were in session.

    Van Crocker an recieved 30 years in prison..

    You probably didnt hear about it on the National news because he is….white……..

    Lets see how much more coverage the National media will give to this story b/c the suspect involved is named Shareef

    oh I did a search on Google to find info regarding Van Crocker..here are the measly results….3 listings from the LOCAL news station and newspaper

    This is not to say Shareef may not be guilty but it seems the media loves to stick to the brown skinned terrorist only….

    we will see …

    well the results are in …..

    search Derrick Shareef (arrested) on Google
    http://tinyurl.com/t8u4h

    now search Van Crocker (CONVICTED and SENTENCED) on Google
    http://tinyurl.com/yy4cw6

    see for yourself…..

  • I’m pleased that police have probably taken a legitimate nutcase off the streets, I think the case does confirm some of the observations of commentators above.

    First, morphing a hand grenade into a “weapon of mass destruction” is ludicrous. If that were the case, we could have destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in December of ’41. Seriously, I think “weapons definition creep” should be nipped in the bud.

    Also, the fact that the arrest was the result of good police work, rather than a couple of armored divisions and the U. S. Navy, shows that terrorism (as opposed to “wars” on terror or bad manners) really is a matter of law enforcement.

    And I completely agree with Ed. I have never seen a need for a Department of Homeland Security. We used to have a Cabinet to make things work smoothly. Now we have a whole new level of feckless, useless bureaucracy that actually diminishes our ability to secure the homeland.

    And from what we know right now, police in Illinois were able to prevent a potential crime without committing any.

  • rege, think about a hand grenade going off inside a big, aluminum trashcan. think about what happens to that trash can. Think hundreds of tiny, jagged pieces of alumninum moving through a crowd at high velocity. Think “shrapnel.” A thin-skinned trashcan become a “poor-man’s version” of a fragmentation grenade.

    Now, pull that trashcan out of the aisle it’s displayed in, and set it atop a shopping cart. Maybe something like face-level, right up by the cash registers. Or the exits. Or in a layaway department. Or next to a line of kids waiting to see Santa.

    Point is—it could take out a lot of people at once. A “mass” of people—thus the “WMD” designation. It doesn’t need to be “high-tech….”

  • Steve-

    Think of a semi-automatic assault rifle. In the hands of the right person, a rifle like that could kill dozens of people — a “mass” of people standing in line to see Santa, if you will. With the proper ammunition, those deaths could be utterly gruesome, turning over the steeliest of stomachs.

    But a rifle is not a weapon of mass destruction. Like Alibubba said, calling hand grenades WMDs is definition creep.

  • Steve, @21

    But, once the grenade is activated (the pin is pulled) doesn’t it go off very quickly? So, even if you set it up on a cart (an odd thing to do, and bound to catch attention) before dropping the live grenade into it, you don’t have much time to run away, never mind roll the thing into a busy store.

    If you see it as a “set the trashcan on a cart, roll it into a store next to Santa, then pull the pin, drop the grenade into the trashcan and scoot” doesn’t seem to be very viable, either. Can you imagine hundreds of people just watching him do it and saying nothing? Even just rolling a trashcan on a cart, would catch people’s attention, because it’s so

    I still think he’s another nutcase, like the Miami 7. Dedicated, maybe, but nutcase all the same.

  • Actually I think this one might be real because there is no immediately obvious political advantage to be gained.

    Remember all of those other fantastic anti-terrorist coups occurred right before elections.

    But then that was just a coincidence, because Bush is an honorable man. Bush, Cheney and Rove are all honorable men.

  • First, morphing a hand grenade into a “weapon of mass destruction” is ludicrous.

    And wouldn’t this mean that every single country (Axis of Evil or not) has WMD?

    Charge fluffing is very common. A suspect starts out with 50 charges against him and winds up being convicted of two. However, saying he was going to use weapons of mass destruction reeks of wild-eyed hysteria and is sure to get thrown out…unless the guy gets a lawyer who is dumber than he is.

    tAiO

    p.s. Do you think Falwell & Co will say this was part of the WAC?

  • Comments are closed.