Tuesday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The AP, noting that previous wars have claimed far more lives, asks why U.S. casualties in Iraq are so upsetting to the nation. It’s a provocative point, but I think Will Bunch is quite right: “When the war is a mistake from Day One, then one U.S. military death is too many. World War II’s got nothing to do with it.”

* John M. Shalikashvili, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote a New York Times op-ed today calling for the end of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, saying the end of the ban on gay soldiers is “eventual and inevitable,” and that the military “cannot afford to lose” those who want to serve. It’s about time, Gen. Shalikashvili.

* A Monday night broadcast of CNN’s Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer confused Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama, the latest in a series of CNN broadcasts equating the senator’s name with that of militant Islamic personalities. The network apologized today.

* I suppose it’s possible to read a more elitist approach to interacting with the public than Joel Stein’s column in the LA Times today, but it’s hard to see how.

* John Henke, of QandO blog fame, was the official blogger for George Allen (R-Va.), and will now join Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell’s team, coordinating New Media engagement for the Senate GOP. Congrats to John.

* It’s hard to appreciate just how much better fluorescent light bulbs are than incandescent until you see the comparison chart. (What’s the political angle to this? It’s a big issue for Al Gore.)

* Did everyone hear about the group of United Airline employees who swear they saw a mysterious, saucer-shaped craft hovering over O’Hare Airport last fall? Officials insist it was just some unusual weather phenomenon, but I hear Mulder and Scully are on the case.

* “The Iraqi government launched an inquiry on Monday into how guards filmed and taunted Saddam Hussein on the gallows, turning his execution into a televised spectacle that has inflamed sectarian anger.” Probably a good move.

* Salon had a fascinating chat today with Ronald Numbers — a former Seventh-day Adventist and author of the definitive history of creationism — on his break with the church, whether creationists are less intelligent, and why Galileo wasn’t really a martyr.

* John Dean has a good piece on what to do when the White House stonewalls congressional oversight, which seems more or less inevitable given the Bush gang’s track record. Unfortunately, while describing the ground rules, Dean notes, “[T]here are no rules!”

* There’s been some talk about incoming Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) having been accused of mixing office staff and campaign staff, but late last week, Conyers learned that the House Ethics Committee would not pursue the matter. Conyers, however, did acknowledge a “lack of clarity” in communicating what was expected of his office staff and he accepted responsibility for his error.

* There was a flurry of activity in the Massachusetts legislature today on gay marriage. Apparently, there were three votes on the matter, which will in turn lead to another vote in the next session. I’m already lost.

* After 200 years, it now appears a congressional vote for the District of Columbia is possible, if not likely.

* And, finally, for all of the problems associated with global warming, let’s not lose sight of one problem of particular interest to Vermonters: climate change has the potential to ruin the maple syrup industry.

If none of these particular items are of interest, consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

Mixing up Obama and Osama? Seriously, that can’t possibly be an accident. Liberal media my ass.

  • * Did everyone hear about the group of United Airline employees who swear they saw a mysterious, saucer-shaped craft hovering over O’Hare Airport last fall? Officials insist it was just some unusual weather phenomenon, but I hear Mulder and Scully are on the case.

    That story, or more precisely, the air traffic controller’s take on it made my made my morning.

    “To fly 7 million light years to O’Hare and then have to turn around and go home because your gate was occupied is simply unacceptable,”

    Too funny.

  • What an asshole Stein is.

    He’s almost as arrogant as our own local 27-y/o pissant, Swannie, who yesterday said in his response to Steve (see #16) “I don’t mean to jump down your throat by calling you a fucking kid but you should know from seeing my comments here all the time that I’m one of the ones who talks some sense. You all need to listen to me more and other people less.”

  • The article on why 3,000 American deaths in Iraq is so upsetting to Americans is incredibly offensive to the memories of those who have died, to their families and, really to all of us as Americans. So before you can really start caring about this war and the lives that have been lost, it has to surpass some previous war? I have usually found E&P to at least be interesting and intelligent (although don’t read it regularly by any stretch) but this is asenine.

  • Shalikashvili sez:

    Our military has been stretched thin by our deployments in the Middle East, and we must welcome the service of any American who is willing and able to do the job.

    Translation: Gee, now that a bunch of bastards who act as though gays and lesbians are slightly less evil than Osama bin Laden and all but burned them at the stake to entertain Das Base has SCREWED UP THE ARMY, and we’re running low on IED fodder, I guess we’ll let you serve.

    I know war has helped women, African-Americans and other 2nd class citizens gain respect and from there, rights in this country, but my response to his kind offer is: Take a cookie for getting a slight clue and fuck off.

    But speaking of armies in countries where people have pulled their heads out of their arses (that is, most of them): I have a dream that if the US keeps DADT, one day it will need help from these armies and those armies will say screw you until drop that stupid policy.

  • Ed,

    That “discussion” going on between Swan and Steve was unbearable. Could you please provide a disclaimer in the future? 😉

  • Edo (#7), My comment, #28 on that same page, was (with no offense to Steve intended) “Swan is simply not worthy of a reply.” I probably should have prefaced that with “Even were his thought processes coherent”.

  • I know Joel Stein is an a-hole but his column made me laugh. I think he is breaking under the pressure of actually having to hear from his readers. He must be getting a lot of criticism. I can see why he would want to cut himself off from his readers. I know he’s trying to funny but he is insulting to the people who make it worth the newpaper to hire him.

  • Ed,

    No worries. Its just that it was so much like a train wreck. I didn’t want to keep reading but couldn’t help myself. And when I finished it, I felt kinda ill. Come to think of it, the better analogy is like eating a big bag of fritos. They’re not that good, but once you start its really hard to stop, and when you do stop you feel ill. Know what I mean?

  • Back on topic, the Dean article is a good, relatively short read, IMHO. The money quote:

    Together, the manual, the update, and Fisher’s excellent article provide an adept guide to everything Congress needs to exercise meaningful oversight as to the Bush Administration – everything, that is except the intestinal fortitude required for winning this staring contest, without blinking.

    I sure hope the 110th Congress has the will.

  • And on another note, at least Stein got this right (despite his too-obvious, and poorly executed, attempt to be humorous throughout the entire piece):

    I’m an arrogant, solipsistic, attention-needy freak who pretends to have an opinion about everything.

  • (What’s the political angle to this? It’s a big issue for Al Gore.)

    I just finished watching An Inconvenient Truth and it’s pretty disturbing. As a political person, you should be thinking about how to take political advantage of it. It would be promoting our party and saving the world at the same time if we could push our candidates for the next election cycle by pushing this issue.

  • The flames don’t need to be brought up again. But any reader of these comments should know that I’m a good commenter.

    Steve (the commenter, not CB), I think you’re a liberal but I think you don’t want to look bad and you felt threatened by what I wrote. Cool off from now on.

  • * A Monday night broadcast of CNN’s Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer confused Osama bin Laden and Barack Obama, the latest in a series of CNN broadcasts equating the senator’s name with that of militant Islamic personalities. The network apologized today. — CB

    Over the past couple of months so much has been made of Obama’s name/s that I’m beginning to worry about confusing the B with the S myself, even though I never had that problem before. Also… Whether it was an intentional screw-up or not, the fact remains that the screw-up happened in the evening — when lots of people watch and the apology came in the morning — when those same people are at work. Not quite “kosher” IMO.

    * I suppose it’s possible to read a more elitist approach to interacting with the public than Joel Stein’s column in the LA Times today, but it’s hard to see how. — CB

    Me, I was amused by it. Sent him an e-message too (and said he didn’t have to respond to it ). I don’t, myself, see much similiarity between that clumn and Swan’s last night’s “follow me, because I’m wiser than you are” nonsense. Stein doesn’t claim such superiority.

    From Dean’s article:
    Drawing on historical examples, Fisher shows that Congress has a host of tools, of various size and shape and depending on the situation, to “extract information from the President.”

    A very apt way to put it; I always thought that getting info from this admin was like pulling teeth.

  • Swan,

    Hopefully without appearing to take sides, I’d like to make a small observation: the following two statements are logically inconsistent:

    The flames don’t need to be brought up again.
    Cool off from now on.

    If you want to avoid a flame war, then telling another person what to do is a poor way of going about it, IMHO. Just my $0.02, YMMV.

  • Having read the entire article in, I hope, the spirit in which it was intended, Joel Stein has definite Curmudgeonly genes in him for which I applaud him. This is the first and only article of his I’ve read but this one really made me laugh and for that I thank him.

  • But any reader of these comments should know that I’m a good commenter..

    Dude half your posts are nothing but self-promotion. I read the comments on here to see what people’s opinions are and maybe respond to them – not to be invited to see your latest YouTube offering or to visit your blog. And you think that makes you a “good commentater”? Wow.

  • “follow me, because I’m wiser than you are”

    I don’t think I wrote that. I think my point was that other people who are not wise insinuate themselves into the position of making decisions for us and we’re on a spiral downward because of it.

    Edo, someone else was the first one who brought it up on this thread. It could have ended with the other thread but I leave myself at a disadvantage if I don’t defend myself once they do. I can’t exaclty pursue defamation suits.

    Incidentally, Steve tried to say that I was changing the subject in his last comment on that thread, and that was exactly what he was doing, as anybody who reads that thread would see. His example of my changing the subject was referring to Kevin Drum and Matt Yglesias and it was pretty obvious that I was only referring to those fine bloggers as examples to illustrate my main point. I tried to help that guy save face on this thread becaus I believe he’s a liberal even though a few of you are attacking me on this thread. I think you all need to learn how to behave a little better and you’re turning yourselves into examples of the kind of thing that’s hurting liberals in this country.

  • Keith was on fire tonight. I hope you caught him. If not look him up on MSNBC.

    I loved the end. The war was because of your (BG2) lies, now it’s about your ego.

  • I really really want to commend Joel Stein for his unceasing efforts in proving that computers are now so user-friendly that bipeds lacking opposable thumbs and frontal lobes can successfully doodle away on them.

    The Washington Post “nelogisms” contest came up with the number one invented word of 2006: Ignoranus. The term describes someone who is simultaneously capable of being both an idiot and an asshole.

    Joel Stein. Ignoranus of 2006.

    How this blot on the reputation of writers continues to work at the Times can only be explained by the fact the paper is now run by illiterates from Chicago who think a failed Hollywood smartass must be “really cool.”

  • ***I want to talk at you.***
    ————-Joel Klein

    Ed (#3)—you hit the nail on the head with that one. Edo (#7)—“Beware of tweensters pretending to be older than their parents.” A valid disclaimer, perhaps? And fear not; a plethora of “@14s” cannot threaten anyone, or anything. (And I didn’t even have the blowtorch lit. Lemme get the matches…)

    As for the news—no “government investigation” into the mistreatment of a prisoner is capable of off-setting the current actions of the Shia-centric government of Iraq. Maybe it’s just me—but the idea of closing down newspapers and broadcast stations that don’t agree with “MalikiSpeak” seems rather “Putin-ish.”

    And the climate change affecting maple syrup production? That’s already a long-term problem. Sugar maples here in Ohio produced about a tenth of their normal “January Thaw” sap-flow last year, and much of it was downright rancid because of the warm weather. The “green season” for maples was pathetic; most of the trees around here had yellowish-brown leaves because the rots didn’t have the chancer to recharge the sap’s sugar content—and the fall foliage season went from yellow-brown in Summer to brown in Fall. A lot of folks were selling their trees to the lumber mills this winter—so look for the price of maple furniture to come down a bit. Our normal “snowbelt” accumulation here averages about 91″ of snow per season—and we got a whole 17″ of the stuff last winter. So far this year? 7″—and above-freezing temps forecast right through to mid-month now, with even the night-time lows being above freezing on most nights. Lake Erie didn’t freeze over last Winter, and that resulted in an excessive fish die-off. It’ll probably happen again this year, too.

    But I’ll look at the bright side, and start thinking about “the orange-grove, where the apple orchard once grew.”

    Oh well, back to the grind. I’ve got another “I-want-to-talk-at-you” thesis on the desk that’s so nauseating, I may have to grade it with the f***ing bench router….

  • The AP is an ass for dropping frivolous straw men in their argument that 3,000 dead soldiers ain’t no big thang. To wit: “Some wonder if U.S. society, now populated by baby boomers who recall Vietnam and never knew the hardships of the Great Depression or World War II, has simply lost its stomach for great sacrifices. Or perhaps in a materialistic culture, priorities are simply elsewhere now.”

    If 3,000 dead is no big deal, why did the AP not have the stomach to write off 9/11 as just another violent day in the Big Apple.

    The problem emerging from these 3,000 US deaths, not even counting the ever broadening death toll for Iraqis, is that the Bush administration says they are meaningless unless more follow them to their graves. I guess maybe when the number of US dead reaches 3,700, which equals the number of all AP employees worldwide, they might give a crap about the all wasteful deaths. Given the AP’s attitude, I might be able to stomach their number going to the great beyond with equal dismissiveness.

  • The AP has itself a little problem, in that their queried “great sacrifices” attributed to World War 2 were made in defense of a nation that had been militarily assaulted. They’ve yet to explain how Iraq did anything remotely similar to what an ultraconservative, nationalistic Japan did in December 1941.

    If you compare the pure militant ethos of Shinto to bin Laden’s vision of Islam, you’ll come away with the knowledge that Al Quaeda (or however the herd of lemmings inside the Beltway are spelling it “this” week) is really a rather tame beast. Less evil? No. But not as awesome, and not as organized….

  • Steve, you really need to cut it out. It was pretty obvious that you were doing the same kind of stuff to me (obfuscation, and reacting to something as if it’s something different than what it is to make it sound like what you want it to) as conservatives do to liberals, and if you have any smart friends that read this blog it’s going to look like that to them. You need to cut it out and you need to defend liberals instead of attacking them for no reason.

    Thanks.

  • If 3,000 dead is no big deal, why did the AP not have the stomach to write off 9/11 as just another violent day in the Big Apple.

    [petorado]

    Excellent point. Especially since some ReThuglican asshat has informed us that Detroit is just as dangerous as Baghdad.

    I suppose the clown who wrote that PoS for the APe might counter by saying the Sept 11th victims were civilians but that of course would run him (her? it? monkey collective?) up against the problem of the civilian deaths in Iraq.

    Or perhaps in a materialistic culture, priorities are simply elsewhere now.

    [AP-shit writer]

    That’s a funny joke. Didn’t the BushBaby tell us that for the price of a major purchase plus $1.50 for a ribbon sticker we would make all of the “sacrifice” required for this slam dunk, cake walk? Talk about a materialistic baby boomer whose priorities are elsewhere* now. Though I bet he doesn’t even remember much about the Vietnam Era.**

    tAiO

    *Saving his sorry arse.
    **Snort, snort, chug, chug.

  • What’s with the mercury in the fluorescent bulbs. I love them but seeing that they have it in them and emit it, that worries me. — Rian Mueller, @17

    Me too. Even more pesky question is: How do you dispose of them, once they’re burnt? Wouldn’t want to drop thousands of them into the landfill to seep that mercury into my drinking water…

  • libra (#28) — According to the NY Times article accompanying the graphic, Wal-Mart is supposedly working on the disposal end of the light bulbs too.

    My big question is can they come up with a three-way version for my reading lamp?

  • ***You all need to listen to me more and other people less.***

    Comment by Swan — 1/1/2007 @ 5:18 pm

    “Obfuscation,” child? “eacting to something as if it’s something different than what it is to make it sound like what you want it to?” Your self-delusional brand of “grandeur” is EXACTLY what brought down a Liberal/Progressive majority, in the United States Congress, in 1994. Your “I-know-all” mentality is EXACTLY what put Newt and his Contract-with-America conspirators in control of the United States Congress for 12 full years. Your “I-KNOW-BETTER” crap is a contagion that Liberalism cannot afford, so soon after regaining control of what is likely the only political tool short of open rebellion that can reign in the madnesses of the present administration.

    And merely the idea—even just the smidgen of a suggestion—that this is somehow all about “my fear of you” does nothing but lend further discredibility to your self-promoted importance on this planet.

    “Stop it? Cut it out?” You think you’ve the power; the authority; the wisdom to force that into compliance?

    I think not, child. And as for “defending liberals, not attacking them”—try not inciting the attack next time with an inflated ego, a half-baked theory, and an attitude that you’re somehow a “nexgen Decider.”

    ‘Kay, kiddo?

  • What’s with the mercury in the fluorescent bulbs. I love them but seeing that they have it in them and emit it, that worries me. — Rian Mueller, @17

    I believe its a key component in their energy efficiency. Note, though, the mercury emissions in both bulbs, if you are worried about this.

    As for disposal, most urban and suburban areas have facilities that will take hazardless waste (paint, used oil, fluorescent bulbs, etc.) for free from non-commerical sources (i.e. you and I, but not Haliburton)

  • Comments are closed.