More bad news for surging troops

At this point, roadside bombs in Iraq account for about 70% of all U.S. deaths. Advanced Humvee armor kits could help save Americans lives, but the overstretched military still doesn’t have the equipment it needs.

The Army is working to fill a shortfall in Iraq of thousands of advanced Humvee armor kits designed to reduce U.S. troop deaths from roadside bombs — including a rising threat from particularly lethal weapons linked to Iran and known as “explosively formed penetrators” (EFP) — that are now inflicting 70 percent of the American casualties in the country, according to U.S. military and civilian officials.

The additional protection is needed for thousands of U.S. reinforcement troops flowing into Baghdad, where these devastating weapons — used primarily by Shiite fighters — are particularly prevalent, the officials said.

U.S. Army units in Iraq and Afghanistan lack more than 4,000 of the latest Humvee armor kit, known as FRAG Kit 5, according to U.S. officials. The Army has ramped up production of the armor, giving priority to troops in Baghdad, but the upgrade is not scheduled to be completed until this summer, Army officials said.

You’ll notice, of course, that “this summer” is not the same as “now.” Indeed, the so-called “surge” started last week. In other words, Bush’s escalation policy deploys at least 21,500 additional U.S. troops into Iraq — without the necessary equipment to help protect troops against the most deadly enemy tactic they’ll encounter.

What’s worse, this isn’t a new problem.

The Army began the Iraq war with an estimated $56 billion equipment shortage and has struggled to keep up with demands for new armor to protect against increasingly deadly bombs. In the case of FRAG Kit 5, the Army quickly produced a bolt-on version in limited quantities, while the permanent version has taken longer than expected to develop, test, produce and install. Meanwhile, the unexpected deployment of five additional Army brigades into Baghdad has created an urgent need for 2,000 Humvees with the new armor. […]

Fewer than half the Army’s roughly 14,500 up-armored Humvees in Iraq and Afghanistan have been outfitted with the bolt-on version of FRAG Kit 5. Thousands of the permanent kits have been flown to Iraq and are being installed at 11 locations around the country, officials said. Over the next six months, the Army plans to produce 5,000 more Humvees with the permanent kits already installed, Anderson said.

Overall, Army equipment backlogs had grown so severe, Anderson said, such a troop increase would not have been possible last year. He said the Army is in a far better position now, thanks to an infusion of $17 billion last year to replace and repair equipment.

Still, Pace said last week that U.S. troops will face a gap of up-armored Humvees and other armored vehicles that will not be closed until July, and according to the Pentagon, commanders will be required to share 500 up-armored vehicles. But the Army said it is not short of up-armored Humvees in Iraq.

When Dems blast Bush for sending troops into battle without the equipment they need, this is what they’re talking about.

Since most of the troops used for the “surge” are recycled and reassigned, doesn’t that make them the re-surgents?

You’d think that with all the months and years of stay the course, they could have gotten their shit together by now and fully equipped the soldiers. Especially when you see a documentary where Halliburton destroys expensive vehicles when they need repair because the government will simply replace them.

The Bush incompetence is truly gross.

  • How is this possible? This armored and up-armored Humvee thing has been going on and on and on for YEARS now. We’re spending billions in Iraq.

    Really, entire management chains need to be fired over this. Should have been fired a year or two ago in fact.

    What the hell is wrong with these people?

  • why does the unpatriotic Bush administration hate our troops?

    failure to have adequate armor sends the wrong message to our troops in the field.

    the only option is better armor in Iraq.

    any other wingnut talking points we can revise and send back their way with reference to armor inserted?

  • To make shitty situation worse, extrapolating the way it seems to be in Iraq and reading some of the stories from those who were there, many of the up armored HUMMVEEs will probably be taken by the REMFs and VIPs leaving the grunts at the sharp end of the stick with the scraps.

  • They did make a clean breast of it before the Senate Armed Services Committee last week:

    (Gates) and Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sought to assure lawmakers that the additional troops pegged for Iraq will go there with sufficient equipment for the fight.

    They said that a shortage of armored vehicles in one phase of operations will be remedied by July, and troops who need them will not be deployed from their compound in Iraq until the vehicles are supplied.

    Somehow this didn\’t cause a stir at the time.

  • An up-armored Humvee with a bolt-on armor supplement is not going to protect someone a great deal from an EFP. The “explosively formed penetrator” is an integral component of an RPG projectile—and Iraq is just chock-full of Soviet-era RPG-7s and their munitions ordnance. You simply “gut out” a projectile, repack the contents in a piece of pipe—or even an old tin can; it’s that low-tech— and you’ve got yourself a Humvee-Killer. Hell’s bells—if the “units” consist of the core for a HEAT-1 projectile, then we’re talking about something that’ll penetrate the layered armor of an Abrams tank—which is probably why we keep sending Humvees out. They’re cheaper than an Abrams any day….

  • Please notice the sleight of hand in this article…

    While feigning concern about Up – Armoring Humvees in Iraq (an issue that is almost as old as the war itself), the article actually subtly pushes for military action against Iran… due to EFP’s

  • It was my impression that the Sunnis, mostly former Saddamists and Ba’athists, who were behind the bulk of IEDs. Now this article says that it’s the Shiite’s behind the latest incarnation of troop killers? Why don’t we just head up north and protect the Kurds. They’re the only ones who don’t seem to want to blow our troops to kingdom come – yet.

  • petorado, your idea may be too late. So far in 2007, we’ve violated Kurdish sovereignty to arrest Iranian agents, and then killed 8 Kurdish soldiers in a “friendly fire” incident. We may have gone a long way towards ruining the only decent relationship we had in the general vicinity. I have every faith that with Bush in charge, we can eliminate any good feelings anyone has towards us!

  • Not only do the soldiers not have the proper equipment for the job but now Bush wants to cut the VA budget so when these men and women are injured on their mission there won’t be enough doctors or supplies here for them. IT IS A DISGRACE!

  • Comments are closed.