For most of Bush’s presidency, congressional Republicans had a standard knock on Dems: they’re against Bush’s agenda, but won’t offer one of their own. It consistently struck me as having the broader dynamic backwards: Dems were chomping at the bit with policy ideas they wanted Congress to consider, but Republicans rejected their ideas.
Lately, I’ve been thinking about why the Dems haven’t been using the same argument on their GOP rivals. Before the election, I wrote quite a bit about how the Republican Party had run out of policy ideas and their entire 2006 strategy amounted to, “We’re bad, but they’ll be worse.” Quick: name three new policy proposals Republicans would be pushing right now if they were in the majority. Off the top of my head, I can’t think of any.
Two years ago, at the start of the 109th Congress, Senate Dems unveiled a 10-point agenda, highlighting the kinds of measures they’d tackle if they had any power. Now that Republicans are in the minority, are they going to put forth any ideas of their own? Well, sort of.
Senate Republicans today will unveil their legislative blueprint for the 110th Congress, a seven-point agenda laden with traditional GOP initiatives from tax cuts to a stronger national security designed to redefine them as the party of reform. […]
Republican leaders will lay out seven “challenges” Congress must address over the next two years, beginning with the war on terror and including fiscal restraint, tax relief, health care, energy security, judicial nominations and immigration reform. Senators do not intend to tick off specific bills they plan to introduce but will discuss their general goals and how to meet them, sources said.
Apparently, this wasn’t just slapped together at the last minute. The Senate GOP started developing the list in a closed-door retreat in January, and Republican Conference Chairman Jon Kyl (Ariz.) has reportedly spent the past two months surveying senators about what they’d like to see on the party’s agenda.
At this point, I think they’re proving my point about having given up the title of “party of ideas.”
Granted, I haven’t seen any specifics, so I can’t very well criticize policy ideas that haven’t been released yet. That said, the seven “challenges” Senate Republicans want to address sound a little thin.
* War on terror — If this includes boosting homeland security and implementing the 9/11 Commission recommendations, they’re too late; this is the Democratic agenda.
* Fiscal restraint — From the party that squandered the biggest surpluses in American history and created the biggest deficits? Good luck with that.
* Tax relief — Republicans want to cut taxes. You don’t say.
* Health care — Now, there may be some actual new ideas here, but I’m willing to bet they’re not very good.
* Energy security — The Senate GOP had their chance to pass a real energy bill, and they passed a giveaway to Big Oil instead.
* Judicial nominations — Stacking the federal courts with Bush’s favorite ideologues does not qualify as a “new idea.”
* Immigration reform — I seem to recall the 109th Congress giving this a shot. How’d that work out for them?
Kyl argued that the GOP is ready to step up and prove that Republicans are the party of “big ideas.” Somehow, I doubt it.