A bad, but useful, analogy

One wants to believe that Bush, after talking about Social Security privatization since his first congressional campaign in 1978, would understand the policy pretty well. But the more the president makes his pitch, the more it raises questions about whether he’s intentionally trying to deceive or just confused about major details.

Out on the hustings, President Bush likes to make a case for allowing younger workers to invest some of their Social Security taxes by citing the example of the Thrift Savings Plan, private investment accounts available to members of Congress and other federal employees.

“Doesn’t it make sense for members of Congress to give younger workers the opportunity to do the same thing with their money that they get to do in their retirement system?” the president asked this week in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, baiting his congressional opponents. “Frankly, if it’s good enough for federal workers and elected officials putting aside some of your own money in a personal savings account it ought to be good enough for all workers in America.”

Bush almost certainly has to know better. The Thrift Savings Plan isn’t like Bush’s approach at all — it’s an add-on that supplements Social Security and doesn’t take money from the Social Security trust fund. Even the SSA describes the Thrift Savings Plan as a 401k for government employees. It bears almost no resemblance to the White House “plan,” which makes Bush’s remarks all the more bizarre.

And while this is slightly off-topic, as long as Bush made the analogy, wouldn’t it be great if we took his point and replaced talk of retirement money with health care? It’d look a little something like this:

“Doesn’t it make sense for members of Congress to give workers the opportunity to do the same thing with their health insurance that they get to do in their insurance system? Frankly, if it’s good enough for federal workers and elected officials to get publicly-financed health care it ought to be good enough for all workers in America.”

Hmm.

When I read a statement like that I say to myself “Either he’s an idiot or a liar”. But the very fact that there is a doubt in my mind leaves the larger question of the mistruth of the statement unaddressed. When we accept the meme of W being stupid, it is too easy to negelect the fact that he is lying. I can’t help but wonder if that was part of the whole Strategery for keeping the public unfocused.

  • Did Kerry use similar reasoning for expanding Congress’s health care to all Americans? Kerry said that if it’s good enough for Congress, it’s good enough for the American people. After laughing at that, Bush is now using this strategy for Social Security?

    The fact that their resorting to this plan of attack shows that Bush is floundering, and Rove doesn’t know what to do

  • Comments are closed.