A brand new ‘war room’

Shortly after the presidential inauguration in 2001, Dick Cheney vowed, “The days of the so-called war room and the permanent campaign are over.” That, of course, was before the White House was engulfed in scandal.

President Bush’s damage-control handlers are plotting a sophisticated war room offensive to fight back against possible indictments in the CIA leak probe.

Trying to change the subject yesterday, Bush announced a new Federal Reserve chairman and convened his cabinet to signal business as usual at his beleaguered White House. Behind the scenes, however, Team Bush was finalizing its campaign to discredit and undermine special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s conclusions, sources told the Daily News.

The White House strategy is counting on major help from GOP allies and neocon commentators who turned on Bush for naming Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court and are now looking for redemption with a miffed President.

Yes, it’s a chance to get the whole gang back together again. “Never mind that Miers unpleasantness,” the president will say, “I’m in real trouble here!”

According to the Daily News, the Bush “war room” has come up with a two-pronged strategy to deal with indictments, if they’re issued: 1) claim that Karl Rove “simply got tripped up” on his recollections of whom he talked to and what he told them about Plame; and 2) cast perjury and obstruction charges as “irrelevant.”

Call it a hunch, but I think they’ll have to do better than this. Kay Bailey Hutchison tried the second of these two ideas over the weekend and has been the subject of ridicule ever since.

Then again, when the White House is caught leaking classified information to cover up lies about a war, and then lying again to cover it up, options are rather limited.

Call it a hunch, but I think they’ll have to do better than this.

Yes, no doubt “together they can do better”… 😉

  • Republicans are hot to trot when “perjury” or “obstruction” is about sex. But when it is about a breach of national security they aren’t so quick on the draw (so to speak.)

    Republicans suck! They are lying, hippocritical pukes. And this is just the latest evidence…

  • You have to wonder about Kay Bailey Hutchison. Did she just forget the words she’d spoken a few years ago, or did she think everyone else had? Or are some politicians simply vacuous megaphones for whatever message their leaders want to transmit at any given time, regardless of whether or not the opposite had been said when circumstances were different? They spew, you decide.

  • On NBC’s Today program this morning Laura Inghram and James Carville discussed the White House woes. Of course, Inghram had gotten the memo on the talking points, particularly point #2 ( cast perjury and obstruction charges as “irrelevant”). Point #1 may save Rove’s behind, but Scooter-boy is going down.

  • As a practical matter, Dem and Rep
    strategies are irrelevant. It’s the MSM
    strategy that counts, because that’s
    all 95% of the American people
    are exposed to. And my bet is the
    MSM will portray it as the usual
    partisan food fight, carefully
    balanced he said-she said coverage,
    which I’m pretty sure maximizes
    ratings. For Chris sakes, that’s
    how they handle ID vs. Evolution.

    Unless there’s a real bombshell,
    like either no indictments, or
    direct charges above and beyond
    perjury/obstruction, I don’t see the
    Dems gaining any ground for 2006
    and 2008, and that’s what really
    counts.

  • what Hermaclitus said.

    No reporting, No editorializing. Simply letting the woman’s words speak for themselves in a forum which many people will be exposed to. It doesn’t take backflips or blatant partisan position-taking for the MSM to do it’s job. B.S. is B.S. Just let folks see who’s putting it out there.

  • Comments are closed.