A busy Plame Game weekend

When the book is written on the Plame scandal, there could probably be a whole chapter filled with details from the last few days. Other than the Bush-Rove conversation, which I’ll do a separate post on, here’s a rundown:

* The New York Times’ Judith Miller, after testifying before the grand jury, “discovered” notes of a conversation she had with Cheney chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby in June 2003. The notes have been turned over to Patrick Fitzgerald.

* The fact that Miller suddenly found these notes, according to one clever theory, may have something to do with avoiding perjury/obstruction charges of her own.

* Reuters, which scooped the New York Times on a story involving one of its own reporters, said Miller’s newly-found notes could help form the basis for a wide-ranging conspiracy charge against administration officials.

* The LA Times reported that Fitzgerald phoned Wilson on Sept. 29, the same day Miller was released from jail. Wilson declined in an interview to discuss the nature of their conversation, but confirmed that it occurred. It suggests that Miller’s testimony may have been directly connected to Wilson.

* The waiver from Libby that prompted Miller to testify may not have been as “voluntary” as we’d been led to believe. In a letter to Libby’s attorney, Fitzgerald wrote, “I would welcome such a communication reaffirming Mr. Libby’s waiver. It would be viewed as cooperation with the investigation.” Reuters explained, “Some lawyers in the case called the letter a thinly veiled threat seeking Libby’s cooperation, and said it raised questions about whether Libby’s waiver was as voluntary as Miller and her lawyers had described.”

* Miller’s notes aren’t the only missives that have suddenly turned up. After Karl Rove testified three times, he found a July 11, 2003, email he sent to deputy national-security adviser Stephen Hadley about the conversation he had with Time’s Matt Cooper. It confirms that Rove warned Cooper not to get “far out in front” of the Niger story.

* Newsweek also reported that Rove is testifying for a fourth time to focus on “discrepancies in testimony between Rove and Time reporter Matt Cooper about their conversation of July 11, 2003.”

For all your Plamegate shopping needs, I recommend the two following blogs:

The Next Hurrah and firedoglake. firedoglake and emptywheel have a Grand Unification Theory of all things Plame, and it is quite a story.

  • Seeing all this information, I’m tempted, just tempted, to get my hopes up. I know I probably shouldn’t, but I’m starting to believe that indictments really are on the way.

    Am I setting myself up for a fall?

  • I have a question that I have not seen answered anywere:

    Can it be considered “obstruction of justice” if Libby did not “release” Judy Miller from her confidentiality commitment? Is that the leverage that Fitzgerald was able to apply to Libby to get him to write the letter?

  • Is there any doubt that the hard-boil Dick Cheney (former Halliburton CEO) would order his right-hand man “Scooter” Libby to trash Joe Wilson? And in the end, Libby will take the fall for the vice president, and millions of dollars will be shoveled at Libby through post-prision, “faux” contracts or a Swiss bank account. (It’s the Republican way.)

    Oh, and after November 4th 2008, watch Bushie for the pardons!

  • In the early days, while Ashcroft was still around, was Rove planning to evade trouble over the leak by having Judy lie to the investigators and claim that WIlson told her about his wife’s secret ID? Then Rove could claim that Judy told him, and consequently, he (Rove) didn’t leak to anyone, but just passed along info that he had been given by a reporter?

    Has Joe WIlson denied telling anyone, esp. any reporter, about his wife’s status in the CIA?

  • I’m not getting my hopes up. I don’t remember anyone doing time for Iran/Contra.

    The Rethugs are up to their eyeballs in more sleaze than even Tricky Dick Nixon could have imagined. It would take a dozen full-time prosecutors with the zeal of Fitzgerald to uncover all of them.

    I’m merely hoping that some of this is not forgotten come election ’06.

  • Maybe I’m overly optimistic but I believe the question is no longer will there be indictments so mush as “how many?”.

  • Ms. Miller is in this up to her droopy arse, and it couldn’t happen to a nastier gal. (Actually she’s in this up to her turkey neck, but I couldn’t resist inserting “droopy arse” into this comment.)

    Sorry for the lame ad hominems. Just venting my frustration in advance of all this blowing over. I hope I’m wrong.

  • can a vice president be indicted? what happens if he is? resignation? who replaces him? and can the chimp immediately pardon him?

  • Comments are closed.