A deep and widening rift

Just a week ago, as lawmakers began to appreciate the costs associated with Gulf Coast relief efforts, a few Republicans went off-message and wondered aloud how we’ll pay for all of this. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) said Bush has “failed a test of leadership” by not including spending cuts to pay for part of the spending. Florida Senator Mel Martinez (R) went so far as to say, “There ought to be another look at the tax cuts.”

And now that the president has signaled his willingness to spend freely and with no constraints, a growing number of Republicans are wondering what ever happened to the party’s support for fiscal restraint.

The drive to pour tens of billions of federal dollars into rebuilding the hurricane-battered Gulf Coast is widening a fissure among Republicans over fiscal policy, with more of them expressing worry about unbridled spending.

On Thursday, even before President Bush promised that “federal funds will cover the great majority of the costs of repairing public infrastructure in the disaster zone,” fiscal conservatives from the House and Senate joined budget watchdog groups in demanding that the administration be judicious in asking for taxpayer dollars.

Coburn appears to be the ringleader, but he’s not alone. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), and John McCain (R-Ariz.) are making similar noises. And they’re just the ones going on the record.

[M]any Republicans are increasingly edgy about the White House’s push for a potentially open-ended recovery budget, worried that the president – in trying to regroup politically – was making expensive promises they would have to keep.

We are not sure he knows what he is getting into,” said one senior House Republican official who requested anonymity because of the potential consequences of publicly criticizing the administration. (emphasis added)

Coburn has said he’d consider putting off some of Bush’s tax cuts, while Newt Gingrich even said tax increases should be on the table.

Republicans have all the power, but four competing goals — spend their way out of a political problem, preserve tax cuts, lower the deficit, and avoid steep spending cuts (which Tom DeLay says is literally impossible) before next year’s election. They can’t even agree among themselves about how much to spend, where to cut, or even if deficits matter.

Something’s going to have to give here.

“See, I believe in helping people out. When my businesses got into trouble, someone stepped up and bailed me out. So, when the country is in trouble, someone needs to step up and bail me out. In other words, when someone needs bailing out, someone else should step up. And that’s what Americans are doing.”

Sheesh.

  • To think that Johnson was driven from office because he wanted “guns and butter” simultaneously — the Great Society and Vietnam.

    Bush has his Vietnam and now his Great Society — as well as his Reaganesque tax cuts and his gargantuan pork-laden Medicare and transportation bills — and only now are the power people in the Legislative branch getting restless.

    Last night we were treated to the bizarre spectacle of Joe Scarborough and Tucker Carlson bitterly criticizing the “big-spending” Bush after the speech, and Rep. Cummings (D-MD) praising the President for standing up for African-Americans.

    Bush is risking some of his base’s loyalty by spending all this money to save his political hide. But there’s no way he can win over the African-American vote with this attempt, either, basically because his $200 billion in Federal programs will not end up being Great Society-type programs, but rather, another money hole for his pals to feast off of, Baghdad-style. Already contracts are been given out to many of the usual names to help in the “recovery effort.”

    Our great-great-grandchildren will still be paying for Bush’s mess.

  • And, I just heard a sound bite on Wisconsin public radio where Bush said now is not the time to raise taxes because it wil stall the recovery!!! Anyone around here seen a recovery?

  • “We are not sure he knows what he is getting into,” said one senior House Republican official

    Was that the royal “we” as in “we are not amused”?

  • Comments are closed.