A ‘diverse chorus’ — featuring varying degrees of conservatives

Ezra noted yesterday that [tag]Time[/tag] magazine has expanded its growing blog presence by adding another political site to its mix. Take a wild guess where it falls on the ideological spectrum.

[tag]Real Clear Politics[/tag] has entered a content deal with Time magazine, and will now have their blog hosted on Time’s servers. “TIME.com hosts a diverse chorus of political voices,” said Josh Tyrangiel, the editor, “and we’re excited to add the Real Clear Politics blog to the mix.”

Except that’s not true. Real Clear Politics is an unabashedly conservative site. It’s a very, very good one, and there’s no conservative commentary I prefer to read, but it’s happily and totally right-of-center.

And, unfortunately, there’s no counterbalance.

Real Clear Politics will be Time’s third political blog, and its seventh blog overall. RCP joins Andrew Sullivan (conservative), Mike Allen (non-ideological political reporter), and one blog each on the subjects of science, international health, medicine, and television.

Just to be clear, RCP is an excellent site, and I don’t begrudge Time for picking it up. Moreover, all of Time’s blogs are strong sites with top-notch content, and the magazine deserves credit for embracing the medium so enthusiastically. But if you have three political blogs, and two are conservative while the other is non-partisan, it’s not really “a diverse chorus of political voices.”

Unfortunately, it’s something of a recent trend.

* CNN’s three most recent additions to the network’s political coverage are former Republican congressman J.C. Watts, moralist Bill Bennett, and far-right radio host Glenn Beck, all conservatives. There are no comparably liberal correspondents on the network.

* The Washington Post hired Ben Domenech, a hardline conservative who used to work for Bush, as an official blogger for the paper. Though Domenech was ultimately forced to resign, the Post was prepared to go with having a blog line-up featuring someone on the far-right and no one on the left.

* When producers book guests for the Sunday-morning news shows, on every network, they’ve allowed conservative voices to dominate for a decade.

Of course, Time could help bring some additional balance to its line-up by hiring a hard-working, experienced progressive blogger like … I don’t know … me? Time, my door is always open to you.

I think this will bite them in the ass a bit. The country is moving more and more towards the realization that BushCo is a fanatic and that the supplicants in the media are off-base. I’d look to midterms to see what is really going to happen with right-wingers.

Not to say conservatives are bunk, just the sycophantic nuts still supporting this absolute failure of a president.

  • Of course, Time could help bring some additional balance to its line-up by hiring a hard-working, experienced progressive blogger like … I don’t know … me?

    Steve, there’s no need for you to martyr yourself for the cause like that. Think of all the flak you’ll get for “selling out.”

    I’d be happy to step up to the plate and sacrifice my credibility instead, just to spare you the grief.

  • “Not to say [that all?] conservatives are bunk…”

    Far as I’m concerned, let there be multiple conservative blogs on every MSM web site. The more there are, the more they will turn and start ripping into each other. They are an unnatural and Unholy alliance conjoined only by their fear and loathing of the demonstrated ability of Policy Wonky Democrats (Clintonistas) ability to actually run a government and balance a budget. Something the Republican’ts from Ronald Reagan have spectacularly failed to achieve.

    And there is nothing more pleasant on a Sunday Morning than watching Tony Blankley and Pat Buchanan at each other’s throats, or William Safire arguing with Robert Novak.

    Now, that’s good TV!

  • It’s not surprising, CB. Time considers Joe Klein to be a liberal columnist. Center right is their left.

  • C’mon, Carpetbagger! You’ve already met Clinton and have one of the most successful liberal blogs on the intrawebs. How about letting some of us little guys get some love?

    Besdies, I really need a new job (I work for nothing but Republicans who almost fired me for my ZZZ list blog). And I could use the money.

    šŸ™‚

  • I know, and we’re talking about Time, the magazine that strongly believes that Charles ‘chickenhawkwarmonger’ Krauthammer does NOT belong in a straitjacket.

  • Swopa: Steve, there’s no need for you to martyr yourself for the cause like that. Think of all the flak you’ll get for “selling out.”

    I’d be happy to step up to the plate and sacrifice my credibility instead, just to spare you the grief.

    no, meeeeeee! me me me me ME! i have no credibility, and thus, nothing to lose. šŸ™‚

  • A diverse chorus: tenors and countertenors.

    Have you noticed that conservatives tend to have high, squeaky voices? The males, that is (Pat Buchanan, Newt Gingrich). Ann Coulter on the other hand….

  • If reality has a liberal bias that gets reported as is, then the MSM may consider this as being balanced journalism. The MSM know which side butters their toast. I’m not too concerned or surprised. Time and Newsweek ceased to be good journalistic efforts a long time ago.

  • Of course, Time could help bring some additional balance to its line-up by hiring a hard-working, experienced progressive blogger like … I don’t know … me? Time, my door is always open to you.

    Time should be so wise and lucky.

  • Sullivan is not much of a conservative. He supported Kerry, calls on people to vote for D’s this year. Seems like balance to me.

  • CB your Time has come! Get ready for your closeup. You’ve got the chops.

    Actually I wouldn’t know Sullivan was a conservative if the leftie blogs hadn’t told me so. I haven’t read him much but at least he’s against torture which I guess is now a far-left position.

    You’d think that since MSM tries for balance in every single political article that it would try for balance on a wider scale.

  • “I haven’t read [Andrew Sulliban] much but at least he’s against torture which I guess is now a far-left position.” – Dale

    Please, Dale, don’t say that. Being against torture is the American Position. Everybody for torture is Un-American. Somethings are just so.

  • A diverse chorus: tenors and countertenors. — Ed Stephan (8)

    I’m conviced they’re falsettos. Achieved by that old, old practice, which was supposed to have died out about a 100 yrs ago…

  • Comments are closed.