Guest Post by Morbo
I was amused by The Washington Post’s “analysis” of President George W. Bush’s admission that secret prisons do exist and his decision to put terrorism suspects on trial.
According to The Post, Bush made a series of “forceful speeches on terrorism” and unleashed a “dramatic announcement that he has sent top-tier terrorism suspects” to Guantanamo. What this means, according to The Post, is that Bush is “challenging Congress to immediately give the administration authority to try notorious al-Qaeda figures such as Khalid Sheik Mohammed by military commissions.” Thus, he has “shifted the argument with Democratic critics of national security policies and competence.”
Let’s recap in case anyone is confused. When President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore or Sen. John F. Kerry adopt an altered or different position, they are flip-flopping vacillators who can’t make up their minds, men obviously not to be trusted with the reins of government because they are not decisive and lack backbones.
When Bush does it, he is “forceful.” He “challenges” his critics and his change is merely a “shift.”
Everyone got that? Good.
God, I love the liberal media.