Chances are, you’ve already seen posts about this elsewhere, but Balloon Juice’s John Cole, who voted for Bush and is a life-long Republican, wrote a pretty powerful item yesterday explaining why he just can’t stay with the GOP anymore. There are at least two important things to consider about this: John’s poignant perspective, and the right’s reaction to it.
On the prior, it seems John is just fed up. It’s hard to blame him.
In short, it really sucks looking around at the wreckage that is my party and realizing that the only decent thing to do is to pull the plug on them (or help). I am not really having any fun attacking my old friends — but I don’t know how else to respond when people call decent men like Jim Webb a pervert for no other reason than to win an election. I don’t know how to deal with people who think savaging a man with Parkinson’s for electoral gain is appropriate election-year discourse. I don’t know how to react to people who think that calling anyone who disagrees with them on Iraq a “terrorist-enabler” than to swing back. I don’t know how to react to people who think that media reports of party hacks in the administration overruling scientists on issues like global warming, endangered species, intelligent design, prescription drugs, etc., are signs of… liberal media bias. […]
And I don’t know why my friends on the right still keep fighting for these guys to stay in power. Why do they keep attacking decent people like Jim Webb- to keep this corrupt lot of fools in office? Why can’t they just admit they were sold a bill of goods and start over? Why do they want to remain in power, but without any principles? Are tax cuts that important? What is gained by keeping troops in harms way with no clear plan for victory? With no desire to change course? With our guys dying every day in what looks to be for no real good reason? Why?
I know John isn’t alone on feeling this way, or asking these questions — there’s ample evidence of reasonable, decent people who just can’t in good conscience with the Republican Party anymore — but this perspective is rather unique in the blog world, where changes of heart, particularly on this scale, are uncommon.
When a party and a movement that bolsters that party go too far, good people who are uncomfortable with the shift have to leave. It’s, in fact, necessary so that the party itself is able to recognize the problem. For all the talk that people will stick with the GOP and “change it from within,” it’s a fundamentally misguided approach. So long as one stays with the party, the party has no incentive to change.
As for John’s conservative colleagues, the reaction is even worse than I expected.
John Hawkins at Right Wing News had a fascinating, albeit disconcerting, post in which he calls John Cole “another lame poseur conservative” who is “shoveling manure as fast as he can as his former allies on the right.”
Step One: Condemn the heretic as irrelevant and intolerant.
At one time, Cole ran a reliably conservative blog, but about the time Terri Sciavo [sic] became a big issue, he get a real bee in his bonnet about religious people being allowed to have a voice in the Republican Party, too and he flipped out and veered left. In other words, he pulled an Andrew Sullivan and got so upset that the majority of the conservative commentariat disagreed with him, that it twisted his whole philosophy.
Of course, he benefitted [sic] from stepping to the left a lot more than Sullivan did. Sullivan had a big audience and actually seemed to pay a price for switching allegiances. On the other hand, Cole went from being a small fry conservative blog to being a small fry ex-conservative blog that regularly got links from liberal blogs like the Daily Kos that love nothing more than to read a blogger claiming to be a conservative ripping on other conservatives.
If John’s just a “small fry,” which he isn’t, why write a 1,000-word post to condemn him? Hawkins doesn’t say.
Step Two: Condemn the heretic with liberal caricatures and guilt by association.
In other words, supposedly Cole is hopping into bed with people like Kos, Jane Hamsher, Michael Moore, Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, William Jefferson, John Kerry, & Ted Rall, because he thinks Republicans are mean.
Step Three: Question Cole’s motives for speaking his mind and impugn his character.
Maybe it’s just me, but when I see people like John Cole, Andrew Sullivan, and David Brock basking in praise from the left and criticizing the right for all the same things that their new best buddies do day in and day out, I can’t help but think that they’re, at least to a certain degree, phonies who’re writing things not because they believe them, but because they think it’ll pull in more traffic and money for them.
Step Four: We never really liked him anyway.
Also, let me add that Cole really shouldn’t say that, “my party is nothing but a bunch of frauds,” because when you’ve been carrying water for the Democrats for a year and a half or so, the Republican Party isn’t, in any meaningful sense, “your party,” any more. Personally, I haven’t considered Balloon Juice to be a Republican/conservative blog for a long time. In my book, Cole traded in his party and his ideology a long time ago and the only reason he’s still pretending otherwise is because it benefits him to do so.
It’s apparently impossible that a smart, decent, and honest guy like John Cole simply saw his party get corrupted and decided he wouldn’t stand for it. It’s so much easier to think he wants a temporary boost in web traffic, and was really a secret liberal all along.
The right could respond to the substance of Cole’s comments, or maybe even take a look in the mirror to see if he’s right, but that’s not the right’s way. Smear first, ask questions later.
I wish I could say I’m surprised.