A government of, by, and for Bush’s corporate benefactors

Apparently, corporate lobbyists and the GOP’s wealthy corporate donors don’t have nearly enough influence over federal regulations already, so the president has decided to give them a hand.

President Bush has signed a directive that gives the White House much greater control over the rules and policy statements that the government develops to protect public health, safety, the environment, civil rights and privacy.

In an executive order published last week in the Federal Register, Mr. Bush said that each agency must have a regulatory policy office run by a political appointee, to supervise the development of rules and documents providing guidance to regulated industries. The White House will thus have a gatekeeper in each agency to analyze the costs and the benefits of new rules and to make sure the agencies carry out the president’s priorities.

This strengthens the hand of the White House in shaping rules that have, in the past, often been generated by civil servants and scientific experts. It suggests that the administration still has ways to exert its power after the takeover of Congress by the Democrats.

As Matt Yglesias put it, “You, too, were probably sitting at home thinking ‘government regulations are proffered with too much professionalism and deference to expert opinion, our lobbyists paid for this administration and yet we don’t have 100 percent control over the process.’ Then came Bush ready to save the day.”

That, in a nutshell, is exactly what the White House has done here. Experienced policy experts were helping set regulations on worker safety, for example, at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Through this new executive order, the president has said cut career employees out of the picture, so inexperienced political hands at the White House can gut those worker safety regulations. The same goes for every other federal agency.

A few years ago, former domestic policy advisor John DiIulio said, “There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus. What you’ve got is everything — and I mean everything — being run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis.”

As it turns out, DiIulio was off a bit. He made this comment in 2003, when there were still some civil servants with power in the executive branch. Now everything is being run by the political arm.

Business groups welcomed the executive order, saying it had the potential to reduce what they saw as the burden of federal regulations. This burden is of great concern to many groups, including small businesses, that have given strong political and financial backing to Mr. Bush.

Consumer, labor and environmental groups denounced the executive order, saying it gave too much control to the White House and would hinder agencies’ efforts to protect the public.

Wow, who would have thought it? Corporations who contribute generously to the GOP, are thrilled that they’ll have even more direct influence in shaping federal policy and regulations, far from public view and/or scrutiny, in order to help boost their bottom line. Those concerned with consumer interest, working people, and the environment think it’s a bad idea. You don’t say.

Representative Henry A. Waxman, Democrat of California and chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said, “The executive order allows the political staff at the White House to dictate decisions on health and safety issues, even if the government’s own impartial experts disagree. This is a terrible way to govern, but great news for special interests.”

Only 721 days to go, only 721 days to go, only 721 days to go….

This has been a major part of Bush’s plan to reign in science, too. He’s tried several times to give industry affected by studies to have a say in the reporting of those studies, and to challenge science before it becomes public. He wants to make science — and every other government department, really — tasked with the purpose of providing PR, rather than objective data.

Sound familiar?

  • Bush’s plan to reign in science

    Ordinarily I would correct this — suggesting “rein in”, which one does to an errant horse — but this spelling is for once wholly apposite.

  • This story is a little confusing, mainly because we use the term “White House” in a variety of senses:

    A) The president’s residence.
    B) The entire executive branch.
    C) Not the entire executive branch, but just those closest to the President — sometimes even excluding the Vice President, who lives elsewhere.

    This story is about C exerting more influence over B.

  • Granted, the scale and scope of federal regulations and guidelines to which business and industry are subject is staggering, and many regulations have severe, negative economic implications that should be weighed against potential benefit to the public. As such, instituting some sort of independent assessment of costs and benefits would be a reasonable course of action.

    What the President’s executive order calls for is something else entirely, in perfect sync with the worst of what Bush and current Republican thinking have to offer, and reeks of the “political officers” associated with regimes such as the former Soviet Union.

    What struck me was the word “supervise” in the sentence, “each agency must have a regulatory policy office run by a political appointee, to supervise the development of rules and documents providing guidance to regulated industries.”

    Having a political appointee “review” or “have input into” would be bad enough, but to have an appointee “supervise” is downright frightening. It is a triumph not only for big business donors but for delusional ideology and those who seek to further expand commander-in-chief powers over domestic affairs.

    Democracy and rationality as we knew them continue to be dismantled before our very eyes.

  • Great plan, guys! Because as anyone who lives near the Gulf, or who has simply read “Emerald City” knows, having political hacks run technical policy has been a marvelous success from Bourbon Street to Baghdad.

    President Bush: Because Success is Overrated.

  • How Stalinesque is this? Political commissars overseeing and undercutting professional bureaucrats whose careers have been spent protecting the general public from the predations of those whom the commissars report to! What’s next – W. unleasing squadrons of fervent Young Republicans to struggle anyone suspected of being a little too tolerant of gays, women who choose abortion, and Muslims? One more giant step toward the dictatorship of the corporatariat.

  • It’s like he trying to dissolve the republican party single handedly. Can’t wait to see what the Congressional R’s have to say about this, especially the ones running next term.

    Has he even thought for a second that every grab for power he makes is going to in a D’s hand in two years ?? Corporate donors aren’t worried that Hilliary’s appointees might not be so generous.

    It sucks today, but backlash is beotch.

  • Junior and Dead-eye are like a couple of bank robbers that have blasted their way into the vault after the bank has closed. Now they are trying to clean out every last dime before they run out of time.

  • This also severely weakens the cabinet members.

    “The White House will thus have a gatekeeper in each agency…”

    Isn’t the cabinet member the political appointee in each department? Why can’t they be trusted to implement the President’s policies.

  • The NYT’s Thomas Friedman wrote the other day that the State of the Union was almost unnecessary. “[T]he American people basically fired George Bush in the last election,” Friedman said. “We’re now just watching him clean out his desk.”

    http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/9757.html

    He may be cleaning out his desk with one hand but he’s flicking lit matches in every direction with the other.

    721 day’s is a long, long time with ShrubCo.

    The last 7 years are just the start to finally righting all of the wrongs they perceive. There’s no intention to stand back in 1/09 and fold their arms and look back proudly at what they were able to accomplish. They want to be in control of the U.S. gov’t in January ’09.

    Cheney wants all of this pointless discussion of what this country should look like laid to rest. He must be somewhat exasperated that people don’t get it. This country belongs to him and his friends.

    If anything, Cheney and Shruby are energized by the opportunity to blow up more oversight for the public good while shoveling more booty and power to their pirate thugmates.

    Shruby’s desk has one piece of paper in the top drawer. When he forgets what he’s supposed to do, he opens the drawer to read three words:

    FUCK IT UP.

  • This is the worst possible development and consumer, labor, and evironmental groups have little recourse.

    Where is the Congress??

  • “Has he even thought for a second that every grab for power he makes is going to in a D’s hand in two years ??” — ScottW @ 7

    I don’t think he cares. The point is to advance radical conservatism as far and broadly as he can in whatever time he has left.

    If a Dem president undoes his acts, so be it. Bush’s MO has been to act first, and make the opposition react. It’s the equivalent of occupying your adversaries by attacking on more fronts than they can possibly defend or keep up with. In the meantime, you’ve set the agenda.

    Over the next two years, we’re likely to see a lot of dedicated and experienced experts leave government out of disgust, and this too plays into the hands of radical conservatism. And, really, who knows whether a Dem president will reverse the order?

    Assuming the order isn’t reversed, the minute a Dem president uses the power Bush has assumed Rs cry foul (see current Republican’s in Congress for countless examples).

    Since Bush doesn’t care what anyone thinks other than those who agree with him, there are no downsides to this for him.

    My current thinking, anyway…

  • Do they really want the next Democratic president to also have these powers, or do they expect any Democratic president to do the right thing and go back to the old system? I’d guess that they really haven’t thought it through that far. But I suppose they never do.

  • Two words, people—just two little words:

    DOCUMENT EVERYTHING.

    There may be legal precedent for overturning executive pardons, if criminal intent can be shown on the part of Bush’s actions.His commission of crimes against the Constitution and the People—if they predate his pardoning of subordinates for carying out those crimes—will negate any pardons issued for those subordinates, as they would represent overt acts of obstructing justice, tampering with evidence, and impeding numerous criminal investigations.

    Probably the bast way to shut this clown down is to push him into a corner. Cheney cannot be impeached; that (i think) also requires the same two-thirds Senate majority as getting rid of Bush. But I’m fairly certain that it only takes a simple majority to defund OVP completely—thus, no VP; no secret VP staff; no shadow VP government—which seems to be the main pipeline for a lot of the Bushista shenanigans.

    Do NOT let Bush “resign” while Cheney is still in office; do NOT let Bush name a new VP, if Cheney falls under the bus, or if his pacemaker takes a vacation. Keep Bush right where he is—in his petty-tyrant fog—and just start squeezing the perimeter inward. No matter how delusional he is, Bush cannot stop time itself—and 721 days is a lot shorter than the 2,200-plus days he’s been in office to-date….

  • What the President’s executive order calls for is something else entirely, in perfect sync with the worst of what Bush and current Republican thinking have to offer, and reeks of the “political officers” associated with regimes such as the former Soviet Union.

    beep52 gets the prize. This is rule by capitalist commissars, not for the people but for the Party. The Republican Party, that is, and its donors/owners.

  • Do they really want the next Democratic president to also have these powers, or do they expect any Democratic president to do the right thing and go back to the old system? – Comment by Doctor Biobrain

    The possibility of there being a Democrat(ic) president doesn’t cross ShrubCo’s scheming mind, (and it is one mind). Like their planning for Iraq, there is no plan B. Plan A is to be in control of the U.S. gov’t. That’s the plan. There is no other plan. There are no other options.

  • Can we impeach them yet?

    I guess we’re waiting for them to actually take the constitution itself out of the bulletproof glass case, and put a match to it on live TV.

  • #15 “Do they really want the next Democratic president to also have these powers, or do they expect any Democratic president to do the right thing and go back to the old system?”

    At this point, even a Republican elected in 2008 wouldn’t be expected to maintain all the current executive orders to remain operative. Which means these policies are only in effect for the next two years. So we’ve got to wonder: what do they expect to accomplish with these power grabs in just two years?

  • Like others on this thread, my first thought was that we’re turning into the old Soviet Union. A stooge placed high in government agencies to ensure loyalty to the party line.

    But Grumpy and Dr. Biobrain may have the key to a bi-partisan solution to kill the idea. Odds are quite good the American people will place the executive branch into Democratic hands in ’08. Repubs are already whining about how the Dems are still running Congress by the 109th’s iron-fisted rules of complete majority power. What will they say in Jan. of ’09 when a Dem president unleashes the same consolidated powers against a Republican minority. The Republicans should learn their lessons that absolute power cuts both ways.

  • Don’t just de-fund the Office of the Vice President. De-fund the White House. De-fund all the salaries of the President, of every Presidential staffer, de-fund all their support structure other than physical security of the building. Mothball Air Force One and Air Force Two. Cut off the electricity to the bunker underneath. Let them sit there for the next 721 days.

  • While I agree with Tom’s sentiments, I would just like to point out that Congress can’t take away the President’s salary. I’m being pedantic, but I see this suggestion often enough that I feel that I should point it out.

    Article II, Section 1:

    “The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.”

    This was so Congress couldn’t extort the President by withholding his salary. At least that’s how I’m interpreting it. I could be wrong. Though I do wonder if they could defund his staff since the Constitution says nothing about paying *them.*

  • I think you folks are missing the point. This is not a power grab by the President in the sense that he is taking these powers from another co-equal branch.

    All of these agencies are already controlled by the executive branch.

    What Bush is doing is by passing the normal decision making process and concentrating power in the White House. The ‘politically appointed gate keepers’ will answer directly to the President.

    Loyalty is everything.

    This is more of the same and has lead to a lot of very poor decisions that were vetted by no one.

  • Wow this is amazing.

    All those political appointees who worked to make Iraq the wonderful peaceful place it is today now have control over almost all government agencies.

    That just makes me feel so secure. /sarcasm off

  • Comments are closed.