‘A lousy salesman’

It’s a necessary evil tucked into the president’s job description: the chief executive is supposed to also be a good salesman. Presidents have a unique megaphone and bully pulpit, which they have to use effectively if they plan on getting what they want.

With that in mind, McClatchy’s Steven Thomma makes a good observation: Bush is really bad at this.

President Bush now has what he asked for — time to sell the people and the Congress on the Iraq war.

But an extra 60 days from Congress, the addition of the talented Ed Gillespie to run the White House communications strategy, and a newly ramped-up sales pitch cannot change the underlying fact: George Bush is a poor salesman.

He’s never really sold the country or Congress something it didn’t already want. And when he’s tried to sell something the people or the politicians didn’t want, he’s fallen flat.

That’s largely true. In fact, I’d argue that Thomma is pulling his punches when it comes to Bush’s sales ineptitude — as a rule, when the president starts pushing a policy, it not only fails, but also gets less popular. This president doesn’t just struggle to convince skeptics, he manages to make his product sound less appealing, even to those who might be inclined to agree with him.

First-term examples are less common, but the second term provides two gems: immigration and privatization of Social Security.

Thomma explained:

Despite his long, hard push for a comprehensive overhaul of border security while providing a path to citizenship for the millions of illegal immigrants already here, he succeeded only in insulting his own political base. In a May interview with McClatchy Newspapers, for example, he questioned the patriotism of conservatives criticizing a proposal he charged they hadn’t even read.

They were outraged. The proposal died.

When Bush started touting his policy publicly, it was unpopular. The more he pushed, the less support he found.

Social Security privatization was even worse, by virtue of the fact that the White House invested more political capital in the endeavor. But the Salesman in Chief managed to turn people off his proposal by trying to pitch its virtues.

In the Clinton White House, presidential aides kept a maxim in mind: when in doubt, bring out the Boss out there and let him win people over. In this White House, it’s been nearly seven years, but aides haven’t quite realized that Bush and his agenda would generally be better off if he stayed home and kept quiet. The poor guy just isn’t persuasive.

But what about some of the policies Bush was able to sell? Thomma tackled this one, too.

Bush has had successes, but they probably falsely inflated his sense of his sales skills. In reality, they were relatively easy sales.

He courted Ted Kennedy and won congressional approval of the No Child Left Behind Act. But getting Washington to increase the federal role in education — or anything — is hardly tough.

He won tax cuts. But seriously, who couldn’t sell tax cuts, especially back when the government had a surplus of tax revenues.

He did convince both the country and the Congress to approve an invasion of Iraq. But that was at a time in 2003 when the country was still in a mood for war in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks. And the pitch was based on the false claim that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the United States with weapons of mass destruction.

Thomma doesn’t go this far, but I think there’s an explanation for the president’s sales troubles: he’s far better at undermining something (or someone) than generating affirmative support. In other words, Bush excels when he’s against something, but trips when he’s for it.

It’s why he was a capable presidential candidate — he went out and gave speeches talking about how awful his opponent is. He didn’t have to sell himself; he just had to tear down the other guy.

Of course, that managed to get Bush to where he is today, but as we’ve seen many times, it’s not enough to actually govern.

when the president starts pushing a policy, it not only fails, but also gets less popular.

That’s true.

  • he doesn’t “sell” at all in any literal sense. he hectors, telling people what they “gotta” think or do or believe.

    unsurprisingly, people don’t feel like they “gotta” do anything just because some small-minded blowhard is lecturing at them.

  • “Bush excels when he’s against something, but trips when he’s for it.”

    This kind of sums up modern-day Conservatism on the whole, doesn’t it?

  • As far as the tax cuts go – they were only passed through the legislative procedural trick of Budget Reconcilation whch allows passing of legislation on a simple majority vote with limited debate and no amendments (or filibuster) – as long as the legislation is *temporary* – which is why the tax cuts expire in 2011. Notice, while Bush talked it up a great deal, and the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress for 4 years, Bush was never able to get the tax cuts made permanent.

  • He has managed to keep the congress from passing anything of value. He has not yet been impeached, which we needs desperately, and his ugly face is on all networks daily. His recent Executive Order giving the government the right to put war protesters in prison, and seize all their worldly goods was totally ignored by the media. They were too busy talking about cots and pizzas for the congress.
    He is a better saleman than he seems. He belongs in jail, instead he contineus to live in the White House and people keep dying daily.

  • I think you are wrong about Bush.

    Bush is a great salesman.

    Who would you rather have a beer with? Bush wins even if he doesn’t drink beer.

    Who would you rather have lead the country in time of war? Bush who messed up the current war and evaded the previous war or Kerry who didn’t mess up the current war and was a war hero in the previous war.

    If Bush weren’t a good salesman then even his family connections would not have been enough

  • I’m not sure if any of this matters. Bush will go ahead with his plan regardless of whether he has support or not.

    If Congress passes some legislation, he will veto it. Result: he wins.

    If Congress is opposed to the war in Iraq, Bush moves forward with the surge. Result: he wins.

    In his simple-minded “I am doing God’s work” way, he always wins and can therefore always justify what he’s doing.

  • Bush is an excellent salesman on issues that matter most to him. He was elected, wasn’t he?

  • Sorry, everybody, but I personally must swallow back the urge to vomit any time I see that evil monkey’s face. It’s kind of hard to sell to a retching audience.

  • Bush’s sales gimmicks work on too many Americans because our media sucks ass, and because of that a lot of Americans think TV is realistic. In other words, a huge chunk of us are too stupid to realize that “conservatism” isn’t.

    But now they’re pissed at the cornpone moron, so they wouldn’t buy anything he was selling even if it was a good deal. When Fred Thompson comes online, they’ll buy whatever he’s selling.

  • I disagree with J Flowers. Bush was never elected. The first term was thanks to the court. The second election results were rigged. The exit polls were so in varience with the results, it was astounding. Poeple stood in lines for hours to vote, into the early morning hours. They don’t do this to keep the status quo, they wanted Bush gone. Even worse, John Kerry disappeared the day after the election, and we were sold out. Bush was never elected, and the US voters were too lazy and self-absorbed to notice their country had been stolen.
    Now, MAYBE people will wake up and impeach these creatures.

  • “Bush excels when he’s against something, but trips when he’s for it.”

    As Benjamin says, this is what modern conservatism is all about.

    A huge propaganda machine exists, which can amplify any attack or slander. That’s not skill, that’s capital equipment.

    Bush’s only real “skill” is his willingness to lie and deceive. It is also his weakness. The right-wing Wurlizter can amplify some lies better than others. It helps if the opposition, for some reason, is handicapped in its ability or willingness to call the President on his lies and deceptions.

    On Social Security, the President was called on his lies, pretty clearly and consistently.

    On the Iraq War, it has been more of a mixed bag.

  • I think number seven has you. (neil wilson) Mr Bush had approval ratings that were in the stratosphere. If you aren’t with us you are a traitor.Some dumb singers (Dixi Chicks) disparaged him and were immediately trashed by every country radio station on the map. I seldom listen to main stream country any more. they are against free speach and any thing that runs counter to their narrow view. I will say that Americans are a fickle people.
    They will turn on you with with shift in the breeze.They deny their brothers and sisters the same consideration they demand as a birth right. I am dead set against this war and have been from the beginning. The tide shifts with the moon I guess. One of the few politicians I have any regard for is Russ Feingold of Wisconcin. He at least shows a modicum of common since,which is very uncommon in our government.

  • Thomma doesn’t go this far, but I think there’s an explanation for the president’s sales troubles: he’s far better at undermining something (or someone) than generating affirmative support. In other words, Bush excels when he’s against something, but trips when he’s for it.

    It’s why he was a capable presidential candidate — he went out and gave speeches talking about how awful his opponent is. He didn’t have to sell himself; he just had to tear down the other guy.

    Welcome to the increasingly dominant Republican mindset. Republicans in general, don’t believe in government. They always campaign against something, usually against government, along with Democrats and whatever the scarecrow du jour is. They have a permanent minority mindset. So much so that, well, look at what they did when they actually had the majority. Whatever it was, that wasn’t governing. They are rarely, if ever, competent rulers.

  • as my ex-wife used to indelicately put it, “he couldn’t sell blowjobs in a brothel.”

  • His problem is pretty obvious, isn’t it? He just plain sounds stupid. As such, the more you listen to him, the more convinced you become that whatever he’s pushing has to be a bad idea.

    I would also add Harriet Miers ill-fated SC nomination to Bush’s miss parade. With Roberts and Alito he left most of the heavy lifting to the right wing noise machine. As I recall, he was personally more aggressive in promoting Miers.

  • Don’t foget Dubai Ports World too. He couldn’t sell that either. Or heckuva job Brownie.Or Gonzo staing at DoJ, though he still has some Rethugs pulling with him on that. And he couldn’t sell Rummy being the best SecDef evah.

    But no, this being against things is the entire conservative and Rethug movement in a nut shell. Against government because Gov is bad. Against taxes, Look at the entire contract with America, that was almost all negatives.

    Reagan may have been their last positive salesman, and he was selling some sort of touchy-feely stuff like shining city on a hill. but it was encasing a bunch of negative stuff he was against all just wrapped up in a sunny disposition and a homespun wit.

  • Comments are closed.