A new ‘Bubble Boy’ emerges

Of all the political issues that I cover here, I’ve always had a soft spot for the White House’s “bubble-boy” policies. It simply amazes me the extent to which the Bush gang will shield the president, not only from dissent, from anyone who might ask a question Bush is unwilling (unable?) to answer. It’s a historical oddity — presidents just aren’t supposed to hide in a bubble from people, ideas, and beliefs that differ from their own.

It’s distressing, therefore, to see Rudy Giuliani follow the same path.

In a swing through South Carolina this week, Rudolph W. Giuliani chose to campaign at a fire house, which is a little like Derek Jeter meeting with Yankees fans — a most unlikely forum for hostility, or even much skepticism.

Instead of the sometimes barbed give-and-take endured by the other candidates, Mr. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, fielded a few questions from the firefighters and police officers who gathered to hear him here. The questions, which began with comments like, “Being in your presence here is just unbelievable,” stuck almost entirely to issues on which Mr. Giuliani is most comfortable, like airport security and border control.

More than the other major presidential candidates, Mr. Giuliani has limited himself to events with narrowly defined, friendly audiences, avoiding the kind of uncomfortable interrogations his rivals have occasionally faced. (emphasis added)

Leaders are supposed to learn what not to do by following Bush’s example. For a candidate to limit himself to “friendly audiences” is an act of political cowardice, plain and simple.

Granted, as far as I know, Team Giuliani has not yet asked people to sign loyalty oaths before they can get tickets, the way Bush/Cheney has. For that matter, I know of no examples of Giuliani aides removing audience members based on bumper stickers or being a relative of a Democrat, more staples of the Bush approach to crowd control.

But what does it say about Giuliani if, a year before a vote is even cast, he only wants to address audiences who’ll tell him what he wants to hear, and present glowing praise masquerading as questions?

Even as a tactical matter, the strategy appears misguided. If Giuliani plans on being a serious contender, eventually he’s going to have to talk to an audience or two filled with Republican skeptics. He can either tackle some tough questions now, and hone appropriate responses, or he can hide now and hope his mean ol’ critics will go easy on him later.

Giuliani has made his choice.

Aside from a couple of brief swings through diners, including one yesterday in Delray Beach, Fla., he has done little of the politicking that exposes candidates to random sets of people — at shopping malls or train stations — who might be of any political stripe, and can raise any issue.

Just what we need, another Bubble Boy.

Unfortunately, he’s not the only one. Hillary Clinton is doing the exact same thing, and needs to be called on it.

When she had her online “chat” earlier this month, not one “difficult” question made it through the bubble. She got nothing but softballs. I even did both of the “chats” to see if it was a uniform occurrence. It was.

Anybody seen her get a tough question at any of her appearances anywhere?????

She’s about as “real” as Guiliani is. She just spouts more platitudes we’re likely to agree with than he is.

  • Pathetic.

    I sure hope the media start calling people on this staged event bullshit. It needs to be pointed out whenever there is an article about an event, and it needs to be in the first couple of paragraphs.

  • Can’t wait to see Rudy take an incoming. He is very thin skinned.

    Love to hear somebody ask him about supporting Cuomo in ’94.

  • Giuliani is emerging as the Bush heir-apparent. He has the same MO as Bush. He is fear-mongering like Bush. And the media adores him, like Bush.

    Rudy as president would be an extension of the Bush years. What a nightmare.

  • Actually, the Atlantic (I think it was the Atlantic) has an article about how, although the CW might be that Republicans should be running AWAY from Bush’s legacy, the fact is that they’re going to be looking for ways to emulate his success. Ergo, Rudy….

  • Anybody seen her get a tough question at any of her appearances anywhere?????

    Yeah, last week in New Hampshire:

    Roger Tilton: I want to know if right here, right now, once and for all and without nuance, you can say that war authorization was a mistake. I, and I think a lot of other primary voters — until we hear you say it, we’re not going to hear all the other great things you are saying.

    Sen. Hillary Clinton: Well I have said, and I will repeat it, that knowing what I know now, I never would have voted for it. But I also (applause), I mean obviously you have to weigh everything as you make your decision. I have taken responsibility for my vote. The mistakes were made by this president who misled this country and this Congress into a war that should not have been waged.

    Not the best answer, but she did field the question from an apparently unscreened audience.

  • Meanwhile, if I didn’t mishear the car radio just now, Barack Obama found a crowd of 20,000 waiting for him in Austin, TX.

  • I don’t have a problem with it – Giuliani faces a Republican primrary with a sizable segment of the party irrevocably opposed to him – so there’s nothing wrong with shoring up the base and trying to move the Republican discussion off of social issues and on to security issues (Plus he needs all the nifty pictrues for later campaign ads the the movie at the convention)

    I’d agree with CB’s point if this were the general election – but in the primary it’s all about exciting and solidifying your base. Do you really expect Sam Brownback to avoid churches and Bob Jones U?

  • morinao @#8. roger tilton was interviewed by the local press after the question, and he was extremely angry that she never answered the question. and since he was not allowed to follow up and press her on her non-answer, i’d say that she didn’t get any tough questions at that appearance.

  • The “bubble-boy” phenomena is now a permanent part of the campaign process. It provides spin, sound bites, and photo ops that are perfect for posing before a public that does not pay attention. A candidate is less likely to make a “macaca” error, instead always presenting a simple-minded commercial.. It is the essence of current politics.

  • And why is Giuliani sitting out the first debate in New Hampshire? McCain is too, but at least he will be in Iraq. What’s Rudy’s excuse? Is he afraid of being on the stage with Ron Paul?

  • What about the radios, Rudy? Let’s talk about the radios!

    To all of the trolls who think of this sissy-boy with a bully’s mask as some kind of hero, Rudy bought 2-way radios for the NYC Firefighters that were about 10 years outdated. They did not work inside of buildings. (Now, think about New York City for a moment. Buildings, right? Right. To the firefighters, radios that don’t let them talk with one another inside buildings are useless.) They did not let the Firefighters and Police talk with one another. Police and Firefighters NEED to communicate, during fires and especially during emergencies. The Firefighters did not want them, and said so. The firefighter brass did not want them, and said so. Rudy knew best, of course, and gave the no-bid contract (in violation of city and stste laws) to a campaign donor) and bought the radios. The ones that the Firefighters and Police did not want. The ones that did not work properly. The ones with outdated technology and big price tags. On Sept. 11, the Police Firefighters inside the World Trade Center buildings had only these useless radios. They could not communicate with one another inside the buildings, and they could not communicate with the Police. Who knows how many brave men and women died on that day because RUDY’S RADIOS DID NOT WORK?!?!?! I would say that their brave blood is on his hands, but I have too much respect for them, and too much contempt for Rudy.

    So, Rudy… tell us about the radios, won’t you? Tell us about the radios.

  • During a City Hall press conference Rudy once again went after Bill Clinton, in the worst terms decrying his behavior with Ms. Lewinsky. One of the reporters asked about Judy Nathan (both she & Rudy were married to other people at the time), whom Rudy had been dating, taking to official functions as his date, and who was enjoying 24 hour police protection. The reporter asked whether Rudy was being hypocritical, in light of his having a very public affair with a married woman. I have rarely seen such a violent reaction. Rudy began screaming at the reporter, saying “That’s a lie! That’s a lie! Get him out of here! That’s a lie!” He pounded his fists on the podium, his glasses went askew, his hair flopped down over his forehead, and so much saliva flew from his mouth that it seemed as if he were foaming at the mouth.

    We in New York knew that these were not lies, and we got to see more of this bizarre behavior from Rudy, e.g. his Mother’s Day televised announcement that he was seeking a divorce. (Did he actually call his children and tell them to watch daddy on television before this happened? We’ll never know, but it seems to fit the pattern, I’d say.) Of course, Rudy had his lawyer, Raoul Felder, do the actual dirty work of smearing the mother of his children: Rudy stood behind him, piously wringing his hands, doing his best to look like the victim. He then tried to get a court order keeping his wife out of their home.

    I can imagine a quiet get-together of “family values” republicans, having a few drinks, smoking their smuggled-in Havanas. Bob Dole says: “I had my aides bring my first wife to court in the middle of the night, in front of a judge who was a friend and Bang! Divorce granted. She never even knew I had filed!” Newt Gingrich says: “That’s nothing! I told my wife I wanted a divorce just as she was coming out from under anesthesia, after cancer surgery… just when she needed me more than ever!” Rudy says: “I married my first cousin and then had the marriage annulled to “marry up” to a blonde actress… and then had my lawyer slander her on television… on Mother’s Day… with my kids watching! Then I went to court to try getting her kicked out of our home so that my girlfriend could move in!” “Rudy”, they all cried out, “You are THE MAN!!! Family values! Family values! Family values!”

    Rudy has turned his back on every principle he ever stood for, broken every promise he ever made, doublecrossed every friend he ever had. He was a horroble, horrible mayor, who, on Sept. 10 had approval numbers as low as George W. Bush.

    As for the often-cited drop in crime, people who have actually studied this (as opposed to some of the posters on this site) know that there was a similar drop in crime nationwide. There was also a much better and effective use of the Police, thanks to Chief William Bratton (whom Rudy fired because HE wanted the credit for everything good happening in NYC) and his strong right hand man, Jack Maple. There were more Police on the streets of NYC because Bill Clinton, along with balancing the Federal Budget, allocated funds for more than 100,000 more cops in America. (One of dozens of campaign promises he either met or exceeded… as opposed to the last few repug presidents, who have never kept a promise.) David Dinkins went after these funds and put them into the NYPD… but, of course, Rudy claimed that it was HE who got that funding.

    As I said, it will be amusing watching Rudy do a public meltdown once national reporters start asking him questions… questions that he does not want to answer.

  • Comments are closed.