A one-man declassification machine — Part I

The papers are filled this morning with analysis from legal experts on the [tag]president[/tag]’s apparent decision to authorize [tag]Scooter Libby[/tag] to leak portions of the classified National Intelligence Estimate to the New York Times. The consensus seems to be that, as a legal matter, [tag]Bush[/tag] can [tag]declassify[/tag] whatever he wants, whenever he wants. In other words, it’s all but impossible for the president to leak [tag]classified[/tag] information because if he’s leaking information, the information is necessarily declassified, by virtue of the power Bush gave himself. (It’s quite a racket he’s got going…)

I’m not in a position to dispute this analysis; I just don’t know enough about this area of the law. But there are still two principal problems with the argument — one practical, one political. (I’ve decided to break them up into two separate posts, just to make things easier.)

One, as Atrios noted, is the way in which this particular [tag]declassification[/tag] process was handled helps demonstrate how little sense it makes.

It’s probably reasonable that the president can declassify whatever he wants, or at least I haven’t really seen an especially strong argument to the contrary, but that doesn’t mean that the president can declassify stuff, show it to Judy Miller, and then turn around claim the stuff is still classified. That’s where this argument falls apart.

Quite right. In this controversy, this wasn’t a straightforward example of the president simply declassifying information he no longer needed to keep secret; this was an example of him selectively leaking misleading information as part of a deceptive argument for war. The Bush [tag]White House[/tag] then announced, two years later, that [tag]Congress[/tag] couldn’t see the same leaked information because, you guessed it, it was classified.

Moreover, as Kevin noted, the other practical inconsistency is that the same White House that says Bush can declassify on a whim also acts as if he can’t.

[tag]Cheney[/tag] and Bush and Addington all supposedly believed they could declassify the NIE on Bush’s say-so, but for some reason they continued with the normal declassification process anyway. In fact, “Defendant testified in the grand jury that he understood that even in the days following his conversation with Ms. Miller, other key officials — including Cabinet level officials — were not made aware of the earlier declassification even as those officials were pressed to carry out a declassification of the NIE.” It was just a private little declassification between the three of them that even Karl Rove didn’t know about.

Needless to say, this doesn’t make sense. Documents are either declassified or they’re not, and the president can either declassify them with a mere verbal flick of his wrist or he can’t. Which is it?

The fact that the Bush gang hasn’t figured this out yet isn’t a good sign.

I disagree that the Bush gang needs to figure out if Bush has the authority to declassify documents or not. In fact it is probably benefitial to them not to specify which method is most effective in what situations.

Similar to posts yesterday. It has the benefit of ambiguity. We are at war with terrorism when it comes to the authority of tapping phones, mining data, and searching homes, but we aren’t at war when it comes to the Geneva Conventions, POW rights, etc.

This way Bush gets to play the game both ways to his advantage without risking anything. If something gets leaked he can claim that it wasn’t declassified properly and thus we should punish the leakers [or more likely the reporters who wrote the story] and if he wants something leaked he can just say it was properly declassified for any reason.

He wins both ways and somehow this works.

  • From what I understand of declassification (I work in security, albeit not government security), declassification is more than just a casual word. It is a specific process, involving the filing of various forms. It allows for the classifying agency to have input into the process, precisely so someone doesn’t inadvertently declassify something without fully understanding the impacts of the act.

    So, while it is clear the president can clearly declassify anything he wants to, it is not clear that simply telling someone to leak information legally qualifies as “declassification.”

  • Ooops…I didn’t read the stuff below the fold before replying.

    Documents are either declassified or they’re not, and the president can either declassify them with a mere verbal flick of his wrist or he can’t. Which is it?

    This makes some sense in light of my previous post. The president can authorize declassification with the verbal flick of his wrist, but the information is not actually declassified until the declassification process is completed.

  • These sorts of “rules” for handling secret information are a huge invitation to abuse (which is why the Bush administration is pushing for them). The good news, I guess, is that as the abuse comes to light it’s causing further political damage to an administration that’s already in pretty bad shape with electorate. And, in spite of my cynical expectations to the contrary, this story seems to have some traction.

    There will eventually be some unified pushback on this, though for now the Wurlitzer seems a bit flummoxed. Enjoy it while you can.

  • Remember that documents ‘properly’ declassified by the Clinton administration at the direction of the President are being reclassified and pulled from the National Archives…

    … so I suppose Bush could declassify the NIE one day and reclassify it the next.

    Of course, it is proof of cherry picking, and that is what we need to focus on, not the legal issues, even though I think it is illegal to declassify intelligence agencies workproduct without consultation because it endangers sources and methods (and some of those sources are human beings, thank you).

    And I still have not heard any confirmation from the Dickster or W. that this really happened.

  • So Bush could have also easily gotten Claude Allen off the hook by saying he authorized the shoplifting, by virtue of a wartime president’s unlimited omnipotent powers.

  • That’s what I get too, Mr. Flibble. It was a classified declassification, which somehow made it hunky-dory. Was the act of reclassifying the info classified?

  • Comments are closed.