A Republican ‘Southern Strategy’ for a new generation

One of the underlying themes of Tom Schaller’s Whistling Past Dixie and Paul Krugman’s The Conscience of a Liberal is how the modern Republican Party has relied on racial tensions for electoral gain. The exploitation of racism has varied in subtleties over the years, but the basic “Southern Strategy” has been consistent for several decades.

There was some talk in Republican circles that using race as a wedge was simply no longer a viable political strategy in the 21st century. It led then-RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman, for example, to address the NAACP in 2005, in order to acknowledge how wrong the party has been on the issue. He conceded that Republicans, for decades, tried to “benefit politically from racial polarization.” Mehlman concluded, “I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong.”

So, can we throw Republican Southern Strategies into the dustbin of history? Apparently, not yet.

Strategists for Rudy Giuliani are quietly preparing a significantly race-based campaign strategy to strengthen support among socially conservative white voters, in the South as well as in the North. […]

The themes the campaign are lining up for renewed emphasis are those reflecting Giuliani’s confrontational stance towards black New Yorkers and their white liberal allies, as well as his record of siding decisively with the police against minorities who launched protests alleging police brutality during the years he was mayor from 1994-2001.

Giuliani’s eight years as New York’s chief executive exemplified a Northern adaptation of the GOP’s politically successful “Southern strategy” – the strategy playing on white resistance to and resentment of federal legislation passed in the 1960s mandating desegregation – resistance that produced a realignment in the South and fractured the Democratic loyalties of white working class voters in the urban North from 1968 to 2004.

It’s hard to know exactly what this strategy would look like in practice, but Tom Edsall’s report suggests Giuliani will appeal to white conservatives by emphasizing his conflicts with NYC’s African-American community. The idea, apparently, is to deflect attention from his positions on abortion, gays, guns, and immigration by pointing to race — the implicit message being: “How liberal can Giuliani be if he constantly fought with black people in New York?”

If Edsall is right, and this is the direction Giuliani’s campaign chooses to go, it would be shameless, ugly, and divisive … and exactly what we’ve come to expect of a man of Giuliani’s weak character.

In case there were any doubts about the stark animosity between Giuliani and New York’s African-American community, McClatchy reported over the weekend on just how much racial tension there was.

As the front-runner for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, Giuliani is presenting himself as a unifier who cut crime and restored a sense of civility to a hard-boiled city. But many African-Americans recall Giuliani as a divider who exacerbated tensions by refusing to meet with African-American leaders — even elected ones — and stood solidly behind the city’s police amid a series of violent, racially tinged incidents. “There was a climate that police officers were willy-nilly violating civil rights with racial profiling and stop-and-search,” said Michael Myers, the head of the New York Civil Rights Coalition. “It was a climate, a culture, the mayor could have changed, but he didn’t. He has a ‘however’ record, very mixed, very disturbing from a standpoint of civil liberties and race.”

The article notes a series of racially-charged shootings, which exacerbated the tensions. In August 1997, for example, officers tortured and sodomized Abner Louima, a 30-year-old Haitian immigrant, with a broken broomstick in a Brooklyn police precinct bathroom. In response, Giuliani established a 28-member Task Force on Police-Community Relations. Giuliani not only ignored the panel’s work, but when it scheduled a hearing for the mayor to hear from youths who claimed they’d been abused or disrespected by police officers, Giuliani blew if off and went to a baseball game.

When assembling the list of reasons why Giuliani is an offensive presidential candidate, be sure to keep race high on the list.

That’s Giuliani; always taking the high road.

  • All efforts by Republicans at ‘outreach’ to black people so far have really been efforts to convince white suburban voters that Republicans aren’t racist. They have made zero effort to understand or appeal to black voters.

    Mehlman’s admission was similar. It was made to black voters, but it was made *for* white voters.

  • I never understood why Republicans paint themselves as non-racist, when their actions and policies so clearly show otherwise. Thanks Misplaced Patriot–it was all for the benefit of the white folks. That makes much more sense.

  • This is what is so unbelievable.. that Guiliani could possibly be a front runner. Could there be a candidate more compromised, more exaggerated, more unqualified to be president than this phony…and he’s a front runner? The republicans are scraping the bottom of the barrel and trying to make it appear credible…what other choice do they have?

    “We really don’t have a credible candidate this year so you all just go on without us”. Now that would be a true statement and looking at the republican party…entirely justified.

  • JulieAnnie may as well play to the wingnuts. Near as I can tell, if the original idea was that his more liberal social stances would make him a strong crossover candidate, no one is buying.

    Single data point, but still: I had dinner with my parents last evening. It is a blue-collar, union household – if you buy that the late 60s, hippies and Vietnam divided the Democrats into “Coastal” Democrats and something more akin to Blue Dogs, they are certainly the latter, although the more important aspect is that they are not really political junkies at all, just small town retired folk who vote.

    They see through RooDee like a freshly cleaned glass window. Past social positions or no, they completely get that he is worse than Bush, that he is a little dictator in the worst way. And they knew it without prompting from their political junkie kid.

    This is a good sign.

  • The Republican candidates collectively refusing to attend debates sponsored by minorities, probably much to the delight of their racist supporters, is another clear indication that even appearing openly friendly to minorities is either verboten or just plain uncomfortable to Republicans. Pointing to Clarence Thomas, Alan Keyes, Thomas Sowell or Alberto Gonzales as their token Black and Hispanic Friends is the best the party can do.

  • The question of whether or not Rudy is a racist came up a lot during his mayoralty. I’ve never been able to answer it to my own satisfaction. Frankly, I detest Al Sharpton, and the fact that Giuliani wouldn’t meet with him bothered me not a bit. That he consistently dissed good men like Charlie Rangel (who’s hit back pretty hard) and his predecessor David Dinkins–sort of the Jimmy Carter of NYC politics, a very good person who just wasn’t a great executive–was appalling, however. He had African-Americans in his administration and friends like Dick Parsons. But there was pretty unquestionably a tolerance of racist sentiment in the NYPD during his administration, and not just there. Bloomberg has done an admirable job cleaning up that mess, and has consistently honored Dinkins and worked closely with Rangel, Comptroller (and likely mayoral candidate) Bill Thompson, and other African-American leaders.

    Since I believe Giuliani’s entire appeal to the Republican base is that he’s as hate-addled, paranoid and angry as they are, it sadly makes perfect sense that he would pursue a “southern strategy.”

  • he has always been a divider-not a uniter-except for those few hours on 9/11.
    a mean-spirited, bigoted,power-mad middle aged white guy-the perfect gop candidate

  • I have commented on Guiliani’s sorry race record as mayor several times now, and it’s not much of a surprise to read that he will try to play the race card nationally as he played it in NYC. Neither the black or hispanic community supported the Emperor, and he returned the favor. Not only did he ignore them he set a rabid white police force loose on them. He changed their uniform from blue to black (how appropriate) so they would look more menacing. They roamed the streets in packs and if you weren’t white you had reason to fear even if you were just walking or trying to hail a cab. The cops, when challenged, would say, “It’s Guiliani time, not Dinkin’s time” (Dinkins, the prior mayor whom Rudee ousted, was black). It was also the time when the term “testilying” came into use, when police routinely lied on the stand, and very little was done about it. Rudee was the policeman’s friend. If you were white, middle or upper-middle-class he was interested in you. Otherwise not.

  • After he’s finished convincing everybody he’s a racist, Southern reporters ought to ASK Rudy about his positions on abortion, gays, guns, and immigration, though he might blow them off. But the opposition could really have fun with Rudy’s record, and show him cross-dressing, and with his wives and mistresses. There’s a bunch of stuff in Rudy’s life that them good ole’ boys won’t like a bit.

  • All this tells me one thing…Barack Obama is the most deluded individual in the US for thinking that he will get elected President.

  • Comments are closed.