The week since Scooter Libby resigned under criminal indictment has been an odd one at the White House, at least for those of us watching Bush staffers go at each other through the press.
The conflict, at this point, seems to be between Karl Rove vs. Scott McClellan. Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that Rove’s lies to McClellan about his role in the Plame scandal are causing trouble throughout the West Wing. The same article suggested that there are a growing number of White House discussions about Rove’s ouster.
Today, Rove’s side appears to have returned fire in the Moonie-owned Washington Times.
[White House Counselor Dan Bartlett] said the president is “not going to be forced by catcalls in Washington” to fire Mr. Rove, the White House deputy chief of staff. Nor is there an internal debate in the West Wing about whether Mr. Rove should be fired while the investigation continues.
“It’s not happening,” Mr. Bartlett told The Washington Times. “It would be deeply disrespectful of him personally and the investigation that is going on more broadly for us to be making presumptions about something we don’t know the outcome of.”
Wait, as far as the White House is concerned, it would be “disrespectful” to fire Rove? The White House is worried about Rove’s feelings?
The president said he’d fire anyone involved with the leak. Rove not only was involved with the leak, he lied to his colleagues, and even lied to the president directly. But Bush won’t fire him because it’d be “disrespectful of [Rove] personally.”
The mind reels.