ABC News strives to please the right — and then delivers

I can appreciate the fact that [tag]ABC News[/tag] Political Director Mark [tag]Halperin[/tag] wants to sell copies of his new book, “The Way to Win,” but brazenly sucking up to conservatives on national television probably isn’t the best way to impress anyone.

Take for, example, Halperin’s appearance this week on Fox News’ [tag]O’Reilly[/tag] Factor.

When O’Reilly pointedly asked him if he believed major news organizations — including ABC — had a liberal bias, Halperin repeated the right-wing talking point that the media is trying to suppress Republican turnout. He told O’Reilly, “If I were a conservative, I understand why I would feel suspicious that I was not going to get a fair break at the end of an election. We’ve got to make sure we do better, so [tag]conservatives[/tag] don’t have to be concerned about that.”

Halperin went on to say, “As an economic model, if you want to thrive like [tag]Fox News[/tag] Channel, you want to have a future, you better make sure conservatives find your product [tag]appealing[/tag].”

I’ve tried looking for a reasonable interpretation of these comments, but the only conclusion I can come up with is that Halperin is telling Fox News’ viewers, “Your paranoid fantasies are true and I’m on your side. Now buy my book and watch my network.”

And sure enough, no sooner than Halperin started promising to make ABC News more “appealing” to conservatives, the network’s news started delivering.

Media Matters reported:

In a report on how recent campaigns advertisements are “getting ugly,” ABC News, unable to point to a single instance of “nasty” attacks from Democratic candidates or their supporters, suggested it is only a matter of time before “the left” begins to “unleash its garbage as well.” ABC News offered no evidence to back up its allegation that Democrats might soon resort to distasteful, negative advertising.

ABC News had no problem documenting ads, currently airing in campaign across the country, attacking Democrats, including one from the Republican National Committee about Democratic Tennessee Senate candidate Harold Ford Jr. In it, an actress playing a ditzy blonde bimbo says: “I met Harold at the Playboy party. … Harold, call me.” Critics, including one prominent Republican, have called the ad borderline racist.

At the conclusion of its report on attack ads, ABC News insisted that “Democrats aren’t necessarily running clean campaigns.” Unable to cite any examples, ABC News reported, “As the races tighten in the next couple of weeks, the left will likely unleash its garbage as well.”

This is political journalism at its most inane. One side is engaging in cynical and vile demagoguery, the other side isn’t. ABC not only knows this, it was helping document this. But like all mainstream American journalism, ABC just couldn’t bring itself to criticize Republicans without also criticizing Democrats, even without evidence, and even though Dems hadn’t actually done what ABC insisted Dems will eventually do.

Ironically, one of the nation’s most preeminent and powerful political journalists knows this is style of reporting is a problem and fairly recently urged his news division to do better. His name is Mark Halperin. From an October 2004 ABC News memo, discussing the presidential campaign:

The New York Times (Nagourney/Stevenson) and Howard Fineman on the web both make the same point today: the current Bush attacks on Kerry involve distortions and taking things out of context in a way that goes beyond what Kerry has done.

Kerry distorts, takes out of context, and mistakes all the time, but these are not central to his efforts to win.

We have a responsibility to hold both sides accountable to the public interest, but that doesn’t mean we reflexively and artificially hold both sides “equally” accountable when the facts don’t warrant that.

As Josh Marshall said at the time, “The plain intent of the memo is to tell ABC reporters that they should feel neither obligated nor permitted to equate the level of deceptiveness of the Kerry and Bush campaigns if and when they are in fact not equal.
Everyone can see that they are not equal. Halperin is just saying it.”

Halperin was just saying it. Now he’s saying that news divisions that want to have financial success have to ensure that conservatives find their product “appealing.” And now ABC News is doing reports that are the polar opposite of what Halperin advised ABC News to do just two years ago, fabricating non-existent “balance” so as to avoid appearing “biased.”

Some days, I’m convinced the [tag]media[/tag] is just hopeless.

WOW. It really is just about money anymore, and this may rank as one of the worst sellouts ever.

  • Surveys indicate that public attitude toward gay marriage changes based on question wording and whether the word “marriage” is used. Results ( click to see the results – http://publicagenda.org/issues/red_flags.cfm?issue_type=gay_rights ) like these suggest that many people are still wrestling with the implications of same-sex marriage, so surveys on this issue should be interpreted cautiously. Want to know more about what the public thinks about same-sex marriage and other issues surrounding gay rights? Check out Public Agenda’s Issue Guide on Gay Rights ( http://publicagenda.org/issues/frontdoor.cfm?issue_type=gay_rights ).

    Public Agenda is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group devoted to public opinion and public policy. For more information, go to http://www.publicagenda.org.

  • Right there with you, CB.

    I’d say the same for the electorate, at least here in Idaho. Like yesterday at the Home Depot Self Checkout… ugh!

    IF YOU HAVE A CART FULL OF ENORMOUS ITEMS THAT WON’T FIT ON THE SCANNER, YOU’VE FORFEITED YOUR RIGHT TO USE THE SELF CHECKOUT.

    Sorry – that’s not on topic. Or mature. I guess I’m just cranky.

  • Unbelievable. I guess it’s time we all spent a few minutes writing to ABC and CC’ing their sponsors, telling them that since ABC is a Republican campaign entity, we’ll be shopping (and viewing) elsewhere.

    The only language they understand is money.

  • You cite Halperin on the Bush-Kerry race — but see what the Daily Howler says about Halperin and coauthor Johgn Harris’s take on the Bush-Gore race (short version: the media lied about Gore but that’s Gore’s damn fault).

    Re ABC: I think it’s a bit of a mishmash — ABC also has Brian Ross, who had all the big Mark Foley scoops.

  • “I’ve tried looking for a reasonable interpretation of these comments…”

    Try harder. Did Halperin say that the *only* way to thrive was to be like Fox News? All he said was, in essence, to be like Fox you have to be like Fox. It’s a witless tautology, but then, he was speaking on the Witless Factor.

    How is it possible that, two years ago, Halperin can be hailed as a truth-speaking hero, but when he later says something apparently contradictory, you assume that the earlier comment was a deception? If there is an actual contradiction, all you can tell is that one statement must be untrue or both, but you have no way of knowing which.

  • Looking at the GMA piece (http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=2604486) while it is pretty inexcusable what they wrote, at least they did it at the very end of the article, after doing a good job of detailing the smarmy Reublicrook ads.

    The second paragraph makes it clear who’s the primary offender:

    “…with Republicans on the defensive, some of the nastiest rhetoric right now is coming from the political right…”

    So it’s not as bad as I thought anyway. I’d say some editor saw it and added that shit at the end and changed the headline.

  • I guess it’s time we all spent a few minutes writing to ABC and CC’ing their sponsors, telling them that since ABC is a Republican campaign entity, we’ll be shopping (and viewing) elsewhere.

    I’m already boycotting ABC for their 9/11 movie fiasco, so this really doesn’t make much difference. Though we will be a Nielsen family in 2 weeks, during sweeps, so that will be fun. Luckily I don’t watch any ABC shows anyway so boycotting all of the Disney networks doesn’t mean much more than missing a few football games. Pain for them, no hardship for me. What could be better?

  • you assume that the earlier comment was a deception?

    Halperin is responsible for The Note, which has always leaned heavily to the right. My personal assumption of his bias is based more on that than his statements on Fox.

  • Given the state of popularity of the right, the GOP and the president, I’d say Halperin is boarding a train nearing the end of the line. Fox news is stagnating, if not losing, viewership, so the trend in popularity of news as right wing propaganda is in decline. Halperin is either an idiot, a diehard kool aid dinker or, quite possibly, a deal has been struck somewhere and the order is for ABC to favor the Repubs for political or financial reasons.

  • $eem$ like $omeone i$ $eeing dollar $igns.

    Someone should tell him Faux is loosing viewers. What’s O’Wrongly’s median age viewer now? 70? 85? Somewhere up there.

    Go ahead and fight him for the demo ABC.

    Let CBS and MSNBC pick up the slack. Or better yet, the off button.

  • “As an economic model, if you want to thrive like Fox News Channel, you want to have a future, you better make sure conservatives find your product appealing.”

    Bullshit, missed the point, demonstrating complete misunderstanding of NEWS and proving “Network” was in fact profetic.

    News is news, if the fucking Neocons don’t like the news too damn bad. News should not be a profit center. News should be independent of the financial influences of the corporate media giant that owns it. Halperin apparently has spent too much time with John Stossel.

    How about we get rid of the fines for mild profanity on TV and start fining News programs for bias? Back to fairness doctrine.

    These network news departments need to be leveled and rebuilt. If only I watched ABC, I could write this jackass and tell him I would stop watching.

  • Someone is surprised that Disney News plays to the right, when “Unca Walt” would have been happier to see Mickey and Donald and Pluto on the side of a Luftwaffe bomber than a B-17???

    Further evidence that the economic boycott the left should engage in is to stop buying Anything Disney. It’s not hard, all you have to do is decide you’re tired of second-rateschmaltz and third-rate crap, and Disney is toast.

    There’s a reason why we who have to deal with the benign police state known as the Walt Disney Company call the HQ of the Evil Mouse Empire “Mauschwitz.”

  • Halperin went on to say, “As an economic model, if you want to thrive like Fox News Channel, you want to have a future, you better make sure conservatives find your product appealing.”

    Even with a shrinking viewer base the three over-the-air networks pull a combined audience for their evening news programs that numbers in the tens of millions. Faux News pulls between two and three million if memory serves. So exactly what “economic model” is sell-out Halperin talking about? The Incredible Shrinking News Program?

    If the media is “trying to suppress Republican turnout”, then perhaps Dr. Halperin can explain how the Republicans came to control the House, Senate, and White House not to mention a burgeoning reactionary majority on the Supreme Court? Evidently the media should go back to the drawing board.

    As to the non-existent “liberal bias” in the media, I like Colbert’s truthiness: “Reality has a well-known liberal bias!”

  • There is something absurd about ABC, CNN, Fox, etc., all madly competing for the same segment of the viewer market. The 25 to 30% of radicals, lunatics, and confirmed ignorants may be thrilled by the nonsense now being spewed out by these outlets. Hasn’t it occured to these marketing “geniuses” that the audience slide of buffoons such as Dildo Billo and the growth of information alternatives (such as blogs) is the direct result of these tactics? If Head On (apply directly to the forehead) 🙂 wants only to that reach that crowrd, let ’em.

  • Comments are closed.