Administration fails to track arms for Iraqis

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner (R-Va.), who seems increasingly unimpressed with the Bush administration’s handling of the war in Iraq, recently asked the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction to explain the whereabouts of arms sent by the U.S. to Iraqi officials. The Inspector, Stuart Bowen, responded yesterday. The news was hardly encouraging.

The American military has not properly tracked hundreds of thousands of weapons intended for Iraqi security forces and has failed to provide spare parts, maintenance personnel or even repair manuals for most of the weapons given to the Iraqis, a federal report released Sunday has concluded. […]

The answers came Sunday from the inspector general’s office, which found major discrepancies in American military records on where thousands of 9-millimeter pistols and hundreds of assault rifles and other weapons have ended up. The American military did not even take the elementary step of recording the serial numbers of nearly half a million weapons provided to Iraqis, the inspector general found, making it impossible to track or identify any that might be in the wrong hands.

Exactly where untracked weapons could end up — and whether some have been used against American soldiers — were not examined in the report, although black-market arms dealers thrive on the streets of Baghdad, and official Iraq Army and police uniforms can easily be purchased as well, presumably because government shipments are intercepted or otherwise corrupted.

It’s hard to believe, but the Inspector General’s office also learned that U.S. officials not only lost track of a vast supply of weapons, some of which insurgents may now be using against American troops, but also neglected to give Iraqis spare parts and manuals for the weapons that did end up in the right hands.

Wait, it gets worse.

As the NYT noted, Warner also asked Bowen’s office to “examine whether Iraqi security forces were developing a logistics operation capable of sustaining the hundreds of thousands of troops and police officers the American military says it has trained.” As it turns out, this is going about as well as keeping track of U.S. weapons.

The inspector general’s office, led by Stuart W. Bowen Jr., also a Republican, responded to Mr. Warner’s query about the Iraqi Army’s logistical capabilities with another report released at the same time, concluding that Iraqi security forces still depended heavily on the Americans for the operations that sustain a modern army: deliveries of fuel and ammunition, troop transport, health care and maintenance.

Mr. Bowen found that the American military was not able to say how many Iraqi logistics personnel it had trained — in this case because, the military told the inspector general, a computer network crash erased records.

(Bangs head on desk)

But getting back to the untracked missing weapons, we gave over 500,000 weapons to the Ministries of Interior and Defense over the last several years. Of those, serial numbers for only 12,128 were properly recorded. For those keeping score at home, that means 97.6% of the weapons went unrecorded.

And what kind of weapons are we talking about here? Rocket-propelled grenade launchers, assault rifles, machine guns, shotguns, semiautomatic pistols and sniper rifles. And what’s the explanation?

There are standard regulations for registering military weaponry in that way, governed by the Department of Defense small-arms serialization program. The inspector general’s report said that when asked why so many weapons went to Iraq with no record of serial numbers, American military officials in Baghdad replied that they did not believe the regulations applied to them. (emphasis added)

When it comes to Bush administration officials executing a war, they never seem to think the rules apply to them. Remind me again why the Bush gang still believes it’s credible on national security?

There’s some irony, I suppose, in the fact that we went to Iraq to find Saddam’s weapons that weren’t there, and ended up losing track of our own weapons that were there.

Jesus! This is no good at all!

  • This is the NRA’s vision of a perfect world. Everybody has guns, nobody has control, and people can kill each other as they wish.

    I’m sure, after we win Congress next week, that the best investigation we can make is into the Coalition Provisional Authority’s policy on the private ownership of guns in Iraq and just what incompetent Bushite nominated by the NRA thought it up.

    These are the guns that are killing our soldiers and marines along with thousands of Iraqis.

    And you know, just know, that any attempt by the commanders on the ground to implement a policy of gun control was scotched by the Office of the Vice President.

  • Is there still time to get an ad up against every sitting R in the House or Senate running for re-election, running to promote to the upper chamber or a governorship, asking them where the accountability and oversight are now that our incompetence, laziness, and above-the-law attitude has given our enemies tens of thousands of weapons to use against our sons and duaghters? (yes, DNC, DGA, DSCC, DCCC, this message is for you.)

  • Good God, this is the limit.The troups should be pulled out right now,and Rummy and his crew should be behind bars.

  • When will the general realization dawn that THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION HAS NO INTENTION OF STANDING UP A FUNCTIONING, INDEPENDENT IRAQI DEMOCRACY!!!! Having the Iraqis dependent on a significant American troop presence is the way it was always intended to be. Even if officials could sometimes claim ignorance of how the plan was supposed to unfold properly, the American military itself knows better. American military members have complained bitterly before that there is no coherent planning for success with the indigenous military; in fact, one once made a comment that he thought a suggestion of Iraqis riding pigs into battle would be received without a blink.

    America is there in force to wrest control of the oilfields from the Iraqis and other nationals who hold interests there. There is no other reason to leave American troops where they are plainly so unwelcome and so unlikely to achieve success – they are dying for nothing. Anybody who still doesn’t see the war was all about securing a plentiful supply of oil for America’s future use, as well as securing it against oil-hungry developing giants like China and India so that it can be used for strategic leverage, is simply determined not to see it.

  • I don’t believe this … a computer crash wipes out a network and destroys any record of how many Iraqi logistics personnel the U.S. has trained. No one thinks to have something as f***ing elementary as a backup system in place? They’re lying.

    As for the weapons, this is what you get when you kowtow to the NRA and the gun nuts. American soldiers being shot at with American weapons. Why do these people hate our troops?

  • What was it Dub said?

    Fighting a war is hard work. A lot of good people are working hard. But fighting a war is hard. It is hard work. See? Hard. I know it is hard. But we’ve got a lot of people doing great hard work.

    Or something like that?

    ROFLMAO.

  • To sum up –
    $6BB allocated for rebuilding – unaccounted for!
    500,000 weapons – unaccounted for!
    Logistics personnel trained to allow the Iraqi army to “stand up so we can stand down” – No, not really!

    Things are really going swimmingly. We have potentially provided large sums of money and large numbers of weapons to fall into the hands of insurgents while not providing the support for the Iraqi security forces the ability to fight the people we have armed.

    I wonder where that fits in the PNAC’s plan for the new world order?

  • Or, to slightly rephrase MNP’s post:

    Unaccounted for Rebuilding Funds to Political Friends: $6B
    Weapons, which should be kept out of the wrong hand, lost: 500,000
    Logistics personnel trained to help Iraqis defend themselves: 0

    Unending political gratitude of Halliburton and the NRA: priceless!

  • Iraq is like Katrina, except we are not only the inept response, we are the hurricane itself. Destructive hot air blows strong out of Washington DC.

  • On the bright side, at least we accounted for 340 metric tons of high explosive missing from the Al Qa’qaa depot. Well, not “accounted for” since it’s still missing. But at least we know who was assigned to guard it — that is, nobody.

  • The failure to keep track of weapons brings up a related issue. After we invaded Iraq, we left a number of Saddam’s weapons depots unguarded. These depots reportedly contained tons of very high explosives. Has anyone ever confirmed whether the explosives from these depots ended up in the IEDs that have killed so many of our troops? I have always assumed that our failure to secure the depots did allow the insurgents access to the ingredients for at least some of the roadside bombs and that the military has reports on the question, but I have never seen a story on it.

  • My God this is such a mess! You can’t make this stuff up; this is the worst case of mismanagement in my memory, and it’s serious. There is nothing humorous about such incompetence. Bush and Cheney should both be impeached and Rummy and Rice should go to jail. They all belong in jail, but they will all probably get the Medal of Freedom. God help America.

  • Administration fails to track arms for Iraqis

    Arms, legs, Iraqis are missing all kinds of things. How can we be expected to keep up with it all.

  • The Bush administration failed to keep track of reconstruction money, they failed to keep track of arms, they failed to keep track of OBL, they failed to secure the known weapons cahes Saddam had. Amidst all this failure, how can Bush claim we’re winning?

  • “Amidst all this failure, how can Bush claim we’re winning?” – petorado

    Well, when his goal is to establish a permenant Republican’t control of the U.S. government based on fear of the enemies he’s created and armed, you can see how he considers this winning.

  • ShrubCo has turned Iraq into the sort of nightmare that would make Heironymous Bosch piss his pants. I can only conclude that his sole goal is to slaughter everyone in the country, including the soldiers. I can only conclude that he’s arming the terrorists and doing it through the inept “my computer ate it” method. I can only conclude that ShrubCo’s supersecret master plan is to depose Iraq’s current government late in 2008 and in 2009, take up residence in Hussein’s old palace to begin another reign of terror. Our military will be too knackered to do anything about him and he’ll have all the oil.

    Sorry, I forgot to take off my tin foil hat.

    The only sane thing I have to say is more and more soldiers are being wounded by small arms fire. Coincidence? Sure, just like the “coincidence” of the missing HEX referenced in #s 11 & 12 and the never ending supply of IEDs and car bombs. Come on, Nancy Drew could crack both of these cases even if she were high on Meth. See you at the Hauge, traitors!

  • “The American military did not even take the elementary step of recording the serial numbers of nearly half a million weapons provided to Iraqis…..

    “The inspector general’s report said that when asked why so many weapons went to Iraq with no record of serial numbers, American military officials in Baghdad replied that they did not believe the regulations applied to them”

    Jesus, every company armorer in the US Army who read that just had a cardiac….

  • First, the NRA has always advocated SAFE use of firearms, making them illegal and registered does nothing to stop crime or make the owners safer. the NRA certainly has no control of actions on the ground in Iraq, nor should they have such power. Unless perhaps you like the idea of the “Nation of Islam and the NAACP dictating our foreign policy. So that is a non issue.

    Second, cataloging of weapoms owned by the host nation is not nor has it ever been the duty of an occupying or assisting government. If the U.S. had brought in M-16’s or other US small arms, there would be a case to be made, but there are no rules military or otherwise regarding this issue. To blame the commanders on the ground places them in the position of making policy, and asking politicians to make a tactical assesment and ruling is equally falacious. Like it or not we are in a case of operating where there are no policies or rules.

    Get used to it. Or be prepared for the US to declare actual full scale war and defeat the Iraqis as a nation and a people with no regard to casualties or getting them on their feet for at least several decades as was the case in Germany and Japan following WWII.

    As much as many would like to, you can’t have it both ways.

  • Comments are closed.