Alan has the Keyes to the presidency
Guest Post by Morbo
I’ve been depressed over Alan Keyes’ failure to win the nomination of the Constitution Party. What’s a presidential race without Keyes? The crazed, right-wing loon, who appears not to have a real job, runs every year for something. With his failure to secure the Constitution Party nod, it looked like Keyes might have to sit this one out.
But no worries. Alan is in the race! He’s running under the banner of the California wing of the American Independent Party. Students of political science might remember this party as a political unit formed by George Wallace in 1968 to promote his segregationist views. I was surprised to learn it is still around. (Check out the photo of party Vice Chair Mark Seidenberg. Where can I get a purple blazer like that? And wearing it with that bright green shirt — smooth!)
So why is Alan running under the California branch of this party? It’s complicated, but it sounds like some kind of internecine dispute occurred. Right winger David Horowitz tries to explain it on his site, but it’s probably more info than most of us need. The important thing is that Keyes is running, although he might not be on the ballot anywhere but California.
Lacking ballot access in 49 states would be a daunting challenge to most candidates. Not Keyes. He’ll just have to rely on word of mouth to publicize his super-charged campaign and carry him into the White House as a write-in candidate. Given his dynamic oratory, I have no doubt Keyes can pull it off — or, at least, convince enough suckers to give him money so as to stave off getting a real job for a few more years.
As an added bonus, Alan’s running mate is the Rev. Wiley Drake, a deranged California minister who has the habit of praying for the deaths of his opponents.
Bust out the tin-foil hats, kiddies! It’s going to be a fun ride.
MsMuddled
says:I dunno. Everytime I see Alan Keyes, I think of Garrett Morris and LMAO.
CJ
says:Great stuff from Morbo this morning! His outrage and sarcasm are justified, well placed and much appreciated.
Steve
says:What tinfoil hat? The answer to Wiley Drake’s “imprecatory prayer” is to counter it with “predatory prey-er.” This is where you ask the deity of your choice to turn someone into something along the lines of a quadriplegic mouse in full view of a really hungry owl, or a penguin with dementia surrounded by hungry Skua-birds, Leopard seals, and an Orca or two.
Rabi
says:Is Mark Seidenberg by any chance the Joker? The similarity in fashion sense is uncanny.
John
says:Don’t forget that this guy got almost a million votes in the 2000 Republican primary. He’s actually on the ballot in other states, I believe I heard Colorado being one of them.
He also needs to be in this race because he uttered the infamous words, Christ would not vote for Obama. I read that statement still bothers Obama.
I’d love to see him get on enough ballots to be in the debates!!! He is actually pretty good at it.
I think he makes a few bucks in public speaking, so campaigning is his part time job.
Either way, you got to give him credit, I’d like to be that tenacious.
Richard Winger
says:Alan Keyes isn’t on the Calf. ballot for sure yet. The Chuck Baldwin faction filed a lawsuit to reverse that, on August 4.
Pages tagged "alan keyes"
says:[…] bookmarks tagged alan keyes Alan has the Keyes to the presidency saved by 3 others sideshow bookmarked on 08/06/08 | […]
Katrinka Yobotz
says:First, Alan was asked a direct questions whether Christ would vote for Obama, and he merely answered the question. Secondly, you are incorrect when repeating the lie that Alan Keyes is in tthis for the money. Here are some resources:
Alan Keyes on the issues:
http://www.americasrevival.com/pdf/summary.pd…
Alan Keyes biographical C-Span interview:
http://www.keyesarchives.com/play.php…
Events:
http://conservativeleadershipconference.com/2…
http://www.rightmarch.com/denver.htm
Grassroots:
http://independent-patriots-for-america.com/p…
http://www.americasrevival.com
http://www.selfgovernment.us
Cam Beck
says:I guess the Independent Party segregationist history is interesting in the same way the Democratic Party’s historical support for slavery and segregation is interesting.