All Bush needs to do is ______

With the president’s support in freefall, it’s fascinating to see his media allies step up with comeback plans. [tag]Fred Barnes[/tag] offered his four-part “keys to a successful comeback” two weeks ago. Yesterday, National Review’s [tag]Rich Lowry[/tag] unveiled a seven-point plan of his own. Here’s an abbreviated version:

* “Accept an enforcement-only immigration bill” and abandon the guest-worker idea;

* “Give some speeches denouncing eminent domain abuse”;

* “Talk about the economy” and replace John Snow at Treasury;

* “Endorse the Ponnuru tax reform plan,” which is basically centered around child-tax credit expansion;

* “Push for the confirmation of his circuit judges that are pending”;

* “Veto a spending bill”;

* and “sit-down with conservative bloggers.”

To his credit, Lowry acknowledges that his “plan of action” is “thin.” It was motivated, he said, by the frequent conversations he has with other conservatives, which apparently end up with everyone rhetorically asking, “Well, what can [[tag]Bush[/tag]] do now?”

Far be it for me to offer the right advice on this, but I think lists like these badly miss the point. I suppose it’s possible that Bush might make a few far-right voters happy with, for example, some tough talk on “eminent domain abuse,” but these bullet-point, back-of-the-napkin kind of wish lists are predicated on the idea that the president is just in a bit of a slump. A few initiatives here, a well-received speech there, a little luck, and presto — Bush’s approval ratings are back at 40%.

To say that this underestimates the scope of Bush’s problems is a dramatic understatement.

Consider, for example, the item from National Review’s George Conway that led Lowry to write up his game plan in the first place.

I’ve never voted for a Democrat in a general election in my life, and I don’t expect to anytime soon, but it’s been impossible for me over the past couple of years to get enthused about the Republican party. I voted for President Bush twice, and contributed to his campaign twice, but held my nose when I did it the second time.

I don’t consider myself a Republican any longer. Thanks to this Administration and the Republicans in Congress, the Republican Party today is the party of pork-barrel spending, Congressional corruption — and, I know folks on this web site don’t want to hear it, but deep down they know it’s true — foreign and military policy incompetence. Frankly, speaking of incompetence, I think this Administration is the most politically and substantively inept that the nation has had in over a quarter of a century. The good news about it, as far as I’m concerned, is that it’s almost over.

Just to make it absolutely clear, Conway is a conservative, writing for one of the nation’s most notable conservative magazines. And Bush has caused him to not want anything to do with the GOP anymore.

Call it a hunch, but a seven-point plan that emphasizes, among other things, White House connections with right-wing bloggers, won’t turn this ship around.

The “eminent domain abuse” point is great — under Bush’s management the Texas Rangers grabbed a bunch of land for their new stadium via eminent domain. That would fit right into to Bush’s hypocracy.

  • Thanks to this Administration and the Republicans in Congress, the Republican Party today is the party of pork-barrel spending, Congressional corruption — and, I know folks on this web site don’t want to hear it, but deep down they know it’s true — foreign and military policy incompetence.

    Sometimes, the truth just bears repeating. And repeating. And repeating in bold type.

  • All Bush needs to do is “Go hunting with Dead-eye Dick”!

    I think I see the basic problem with the Republikan plan right in the 7 point plan layed out by Rich Lowry. Here it is…NOBODY except conservative Republikans thinks about any of these issues more than casually and none of these items are in the top 10 concerns of regular Americans. Vetoing a spending bill sort of counts as deficit spending is a common concern, but the way he puts it it makes it seem like that is not the idea behind the action. It seems more dubious.

    There is nothing in this administration that anyone outside of the administration can get behind and cheer for. They suck.

    I find it interesting that George W. Bush rates as ” […] the most politically and substantively inept that the nation has had in over a quarter of a century” per Geo. Conway. Lets see, 2006 – 25 = 1981. Reagan (8), Bush I (4), Clinton (8), Bush II (5). I guess in neo-nazi circles ranking below Clinton is a major insult but Reagan is God, Bush I looks like God compared to his retarded son, and like him or not Clinton was a good POTUS. So Conway will not be heading up the commission to put W. on Mount Rushmore. Great.

    Toss out the baby and the bathwater, then sell the house and move to a town where nobody knows you.

  • I would feel more sorry for Conway if he had witheld his vote and his money for the “past couple of years” and let the GOP know why. By voting for them and giving them money he is more than tacitly agree with their agenda and their tactics. He and all those that voted for the GOP (including those that are belatedly unhappy) have no one to blame but themselves. The Democratic party isn’t to blame for the general crappiness of the GOP any more than the GOP is to blame for the Democratic party lameness and lack of spine. While it is nice that they are finally breathing the are in the real world, I wish they could have done it sooner and spared this country and the planet 4 more years of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove and all of the chickens that came home to roost. And to make matters worse, he isn’t likely to punish the GOP in any way other than a few words here and there. He seems ill inclined to hold their feet to the fire and demand accountability, answers, straight talk, etc. While it may more passive than active, he looks to keep rewarding the worst in the GOP.

  • The Republican’t Party

    Can’t control spending.
    Can’t keep their noses clean.
    Can’t implement successful policies.
    Can’t possibly win elections in 2006.

  • * “Accept an enforcement-only immigration bill” and abandon the guest-worker idea;

    — Accept permenant minority party status in this country

    * “Give some speeches denouncing eminent domain abuse”;

    — Which is done at the behest of his business lobbyist friends

    * “Talk about the economy” and replace John Snow at Treasury;

    — And explain why it is still not good enough to make up for the lost revenue from his tax cuts ????

    * “Endorse the Ponnuru tax reform plan,” which is basically centered around child-tax credit expansion;

    — Really useful, now my daughter is eighteen ;-(

    * “Push for the confirmation of his circuit judges that are pending”;

    — Remind the voters just how much you are in the pocket of the Theocratic Reactionaries

    * “Veto a spending bill”;

    — Veto any damn thing! Are you just waiting for the Democrats to win in November before you start?

    * and “sit-down with conservative bloggers.”

    — Yes, definately show another portion of the electorate that you are an incompetent, inarticulate, incompassionate, self-centered boob!

  • Bush’s fortune came from the sale of his share in the Texas Rangers. The Texas Rangers increased greatly in value after the Ballpark in Arlington was built. The land for the Ballpark in Arlington was acquired via eminent domain.

    Hence it could easily be argued that Bush’s fortune is due to eminent domain. He’s poorly positioned to fight against it.

  • “Yes, definately show another portion of the electorate that you are an incompetent, inarticulate, incompassionate, self-centered boob!”

    Ever read RedState, PowerLine, or Little Green Footballs? Bush wouldn’t have any trouble being wholeheartedly embraced by those troglodytes.

  • Bush’s best shot at redemption is to join Cheney at the undisclosed location and stay there until jan 2009

  • The big gorilla in the room is that nobody really listens to what Bush says anymore because they know it won’t mean anything. Everything he says is either uninformed or fabricated or both. And the American public knows it.

    It won’t matter a bit who he talks to or what he says. Nothing he says makes any difference at all.

    Poor George.

  • I don’t know that anything much can help him. Someone, somewhere said in response to these numbers, that they didn’t even think another 9/11-like even could help (and that would to my mind be the only rallying cry) because it has gotten so bad. Few believe him about anything he says, few trust him and what he says, and few believe in his competence.

  • What these people (conservative media figures / pundits) are going to do is criticize Bush a little bit now, and by doing so they are going to maintain credibility with their audiences. Instead of conservative voters really becoming disillusioned w/ Republicans, and starting to listen to Air America a little more, they are going to “stand by their man,” and when the conservatives offer these voters another hack to replace Bush- they’ll make it look like there’s a distinction between the new candidate and the old, but functionally, there won’t be- these people will still turn out to pull the levers, repeat the phony smears and donate the dollars. The identity politics will get their little asses moving because these conservative media “gateways”/figureheads are nudging over the tiniest bit they have to, now, in a politically tense moment, to still maintain credibility.

  • Some say you look to the end of a person’s letter to see what they really wanted–

    If the conservative bloggers are so eager to get their star to sit down with them so they can fawn over him, tell him what he wants to hear: “All Bush needs to do is chill out and go on another vacation!”

  • What can he do at this point?

    Resign. And let the grownups try to clean up his mess. In fact, cleaning up Bush’s messes will be the America’s mission going forward.

  • The fact that one of Lowry’s seven points is “talk about the economy” is kind of amazing when you think about it. The White House never really talks about the economy. In fact, except for tax cuts and the usual GOP talking points about growth, there is no articulation of any economic policy at all.

    Same goes for diplomacy: there isn’t any. It’s why Bush keeps going back to the military option. (When was the last time we heard anything about anyone negotiating with the Israelis and Paklestinians?) All we have is Condi Rice flying from capital to capital scolding people.

    No one in Bush’s White House knows how to create and follow through on a comprehensive economic policy. No one knows how to engage in foreign diplomacy. And it’s because, as we’ve known since the Paul O’Neill days, politics has completely replaced policy in this White House.

  • I hope he takes Lowry’s advice. Playing to his base of moronic, war-mongering, theocratic minions is what got Bush into the mess he’s in. (Well, that, and being stupid, corrupt, lazy and incompetant)

    Yes, by all means! Sit down with the LGF-ers! Let them fashion you a gameplan, Chimpy!

    Then we can dispose of conservatism and the republican party once and for all. Into the dustbin of history.

    I can’t wait.

  • Amen to all of the comments. When Bush wasn’t being bailed out by friends of his father he was at the public trough with his own eminent domain scam.

    When you cater only to your base you may get elected but you won’t be able to govern. What can Bush do now? Is there anyone here that would trust him if he suddently became a liberal. And just imagine what Barnes or Lowry would say. His only constituency now are those who directly owe their jobs to him and those who think he was ordained by God to govern.

  • And they tell me that Rich Lowry gets paid to come up with such ideas. Nice work if you can get it, I guess.

    No getting serious about Iraq.
    No axing of Rumsfeld; let’s simply “86” the already invisible John Snow.
    No visionary solutions for NOLA and the Gulf Coast.
    No demonstration of real leadership on alternative energy and moving towards less dependence on oil.
    No need to consider that war-time spending could demand war-time taxation. Let’s just keep giving IOU’s to China.
    No inspired compromises on immigration; let’s just criminalize everything and call it good.
    No rational plan to work to craft answers to problems in the health care system.
    No uniting, no ‘fessing up, not even a manned mission to Mars – no nothing.

    Other than the time he fired Ann Coulter’s ass, I’ve never had much use for Rich Lowry. He thinks bringing the (still relatively and depressingly) few disaffected Republicans back to fold will make all this country’s boo-boo’s all better – at least long enough for Republicans to glide to the next election (since their engines are currently out). And he thinks they can be bought for less than a song. Why should he care whether any meaningful improvement in our state of state affairs actually improves?

    That kind of deep thinking is priceless in its own way. As I said before, nice work if you can get it.

  • The noticeable thing about this advice is that it’s geared toward shoring up the base.
    * “Give some speeches denouncing eminent domain abuse”;
    * “Talk about the economy” and replace John Snow at Treasury;

    These, like shmoozing with bloggers, are fringe appeals. Problem is, Bush already’s got the base nailed down. That’s his 38%. Frankly, that’s a pretty big base. The neocons’ error was in thinking that 50% was Bush’s base–locksteppers assuming everyone marching along with them at any given moment were locksteppers, too. Arrogance in motion. Pinheads.

  • “All Bush needs to do is … re-wind to “start” and then “play by the rules” that apply to the rest of us. Obviously, that’s impossible. Ergo, there’s nothing Bush can do. You’re wasting your time, Rich Lowry.

  • I like the full text of the sixth point:

    Veto a spending bill. It will make him look strong, and the GOP base will love it. It will embarrass the GOP congress, but, hey, they deserve it, and ultimately the congressional GOP gains when Bush gains.

    Sure, embarrass the Republicans in Congress. No doubt they’ll appreciate that just as they’re headed into their election, while Bush no longer has to worry about voters. Then when the Democrats gain seats, how is Bush’s position improved? I guess if the Democrats gain enough he’ll have plenty of opportunities to make up his veto deficit — maybe that’ll make him look more macho.

  • The funniest thing about all this is how so-oooo many of these chowder-head conservatives have become “fair-weather foes” of their precious leaker-in-chief. They pan the clown as being “incompetent” only because it has become fashionable for them to do so. Bush-bashing has become “the latest fad” among “real” conservatives. It’s almost identical to all the right-wing Germans in 1945, going around saying: “Who—me? I’m no Nazi!” It’s easy for conservatives to change their tune, when the mother of all ends for the neoconservative political experiment is so near….

  • Umm, Rich, you forgot to mention about the problems in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and the fact bin Laden is still out there.
    But then again you didn’t say “nuke Iran”, so props to you.

    And your “secure the border” BS is more about keeping non-whites who don’t speak English out of the country than any desire to keep terrorists out.

    Seriously, if you’re a member of al Qaeda, which border would you choose? The increasingly militarized one between Mexico and the US, or the rather long, UNDEFENDED one between the US and Canada?

  • Another 9/11 wouldn’t help? How do we know?

    It’s actually not too hard to test this with polling and focus groups. Are any Dem pollsters doing this?

    I want to see hard numbers, putting forth a few nightmare scenarios (nuke attack on SF or LA by North Korea, dirty bomb in New York, Israel attacks Iran and a full-on nuclear war starts between USA and Iran, etc.), and what would the approval ratings for Shrub and his Repugs end up as? Test all the same bullshit messages and most importantly IMAGES they used after 9/11– “rally behind our commander in chief”, troops as a political backdrop, and all that bullshit– and see how it does.

    In focus group, fire up Premiere or iMovie and hack up some sensationalist, emotionally cloying, fear-mongering fake FAUX news segments, cut in some tough-talk footage of Shrub vowing to revenge these heinous deeds, and test people’s opinion before and after them. That’s the most realistic post-attack scenario: they’ll play all those cards again. Throw in a swiftboating or too: clips of soft-voiced Democratic congressional leaders droning on about moderation and sanity.

    I suspect, the Repugs pick up seats in Congress and Shrub’s poll numbers go up to the 90% level again. They OWN THE MEDIA, which means they own the emotions and perceptions of the vast majority of this country.

    But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe people are so cynical now that they won’t buy that same line of crap again. If I’m wrong, I’ll sleep much easier at night. Well, I’ll sleep even more easily at night after we take Congress back and start the impeachment proceedings in 2007, and replace these clowns with some Democrats in 2008 who actually have some idea how to keep us safe from these nightmarish scenarios in the first place.

    We shouldn’t be leaving this to guesswork. This needs good research… we need to know that the risks are and then we might even test some ways to either inoculate people against this stuff or some kind of antidote that’ll work after the fact.

  • I’m going to say what Frak already said – the best plan is a two-point one: resign and stand trial. Just so long as it’s done with Cheney also resigning, and after the Democrats manage to have the House handed to them in 2006 due to being slightly less inept than the Republicans. I was going to say that it should be a one-point plan: completely reverse every single policy of his administration except the whole pro-democracy thing (democracy good!) but he would probably screw it up horribly anyway.

  • Don’t even worry about Bush. The problems that any president would face right now are so intractable that no one would look good. Not excusing Bush’s utter incompetence, but he distracts us from the big issues that remain unaddressed and continue to wash us, without a stern man, down a very rocky rapid with a thunderous waterfall at the end.

    If Bush wants to save his administration and help us through the coming mess he should concentrate on two things — 1. start the American people on living a meaningful life on a very small diet of energy and resources and 2. get the economy off the delusionary concept of GDP. Not exactly Republican or Democratic. But nothing that will save us is.

  • “Seriously, if you’re a member of al Qaeda, which border would you choose? The increasingly militarized one between Mexico and the US, or the rather long, UNDEFENDED one between the US and Canada?” – 2Manchu

    Considering that last time they just flew in this country on airplanes, why bother crossing a border at all? Our ports of entry are not really secured.

    And remember that the millenium attack was stopped at the Canadian border when a border officer thought someone looked suspicious and found explosives in their car.

  • funny enough, the washpost’s editorial board jumps in with their own – equally pointless – advice this morning.

  • Lance,
    Good point. I was just pointing out the stupidty of the whole “we got to build a wall next to Mexico because that’s where the terrorists are going to come from” reasoning that I hear from pundits on the right.

    The Clinton administration stopped a terrorist plot?? That’s not what Hannity told me…….

  • Comments are closed.