All Saints 1, IRS 0

Shortly before the 2004 presidential election, the Rev. George F. Regas, the former rector of All Saints Episcopal Church in Pasadena, told his congregation about his perspective on the president and the war in Iraq. Regas imagined Jesus participating in a political debate with Bush and Kerry and said that “good people of profound faith” could vote for either man.

He added, however, that he imagined Jesus telling Bush, “Mr. President, your doctrine of preemptive war is a failed doctrine. Forcibly changing the regime of an enemy that posed no imminent threat has led to disaster.” The comments prompted the IRS to launch an aggressive investigation into the church’s alleged partisan conduct.

Last week, the investigation ended — and All Saints is in the clear.

The Internal Revenue Service has told a prominent Pasadena church that it has ended its lengthy investigation into a 2004 antiwar sermon, church leaders said Sunday. […]

[The Rev. J. Edwin Bacon Jr.] predicted that the vague, mixed message from the IRS after its nearly two-year investigation of the All Saints case would have a continued “chilling effect” on the freedom of clerics from all faiths to preach about moral values and significant social issues such as war and poverty.

Although the church no longer faces the imminent loss of its tax-exempt status, All Saints has “no more guidance about the IRS rules now than when we started this process,” the rector said. He said the church would continue its struggle with the IRS, which he said so far had cost the 3,500-member congregation about $200,000.

I’m glad the matter was resolved, but there are still lingering questions about whether the IRS investigation was driven by partisan motivations. It seems scary to think administration officials targeted All Saints because it’s a progressive church, but there’s reason to raise the question.

From the outset, the IRS seemed to deal with All Saints in an unusual way. For example, when a ministry is suspected of intervening in a political campaign, ordinarily the first step is a warning letter from the IRS. In this case, the agency skipped that step and went right to a threatening letter, stating that “a reasonable belief exists that you may not be tax-exempt as a church.”

Moreover, usually a house of worship is reminded of legal limits, the institution promises to play nice, and unless there’s a pattern of repeated abuse, the matter is final. The IRS seems to have taken a far more aggressive position towards All Saints Episcopal. The church provided the IRS with a copy of all literature given out before the election; the IRS said it wasn’t satisfied. The church said it never endorses candidates; the IRS told church officials to either admit wrongdoing or face more intense scrutiny.

For that matter, there were multiple examples from the same election cycle of similar comments from conservative pastors in the South, some of which are arguably far more partisan than the All Saints example, but which did not prompt similar investigations.

All Saints and its lawyers also found unusual interaction between the IRS and the Justice Department in this case.

Along with its requests to the IRS, All Saints has asked a top Treasury Department official to investigate what the church called a series of procedural and substantive errors in the case, including allegedly inappropriate conversations between IRS and Justice Department officials about the investigation.

Those conversations, documented in e-mails obtained by the church through Freedom of Information Act requests, appear to show that Justice Department officials were involved in the All Saints case before the IRS made any formal referral of it for possible prosecution, an attorney for the church said. The discussions raise concerns that the IRS’ investigation was politically motivated, church officials said. One e-mail, for example, appears to show coordination between IRS and Justice Department officials about a request to the church for documents. Others discuss the timing of the request and news coverage about the case.

“In view of the fact that recent congressional inquiries have revealed extensive politicization of [the Department of Justice], my client is very concerned that the close coordination undertaken by the IRS allowed partisan political concerns to direct the course of the All Saints examination,” attorney Marcus S. Owens wrote in a letter Friday requesting an investigation.

Owens knows what he’s talking about — he’s not just a lawyer, he’s also the former head of the IRS’s tax-exempt division.

Given the circumstances, it’s not unreasonable to wonder if, perhaps, Bush-appointed staffers at the IRS targeted All Saints because they didn’t like the sermon’s criticism of their president. It would be an outrageous abuse of power for the IRS to go after a house of worship based on partisan political concerns, but given what we’ve seen of the Bush gang, it’s hard to offer the administration much in the way of benefit of the doubt.

During Watergate, we learned that Nixon used the IRS to harass and intimidate political opponents. Let’s hope this isn’t a repeat of the same abuse.

I’m confused. Doesn’t practically every fundie church in the south call for people to vote Republican. Or am I missing something here?

  • If it looks like a rat, smells like a rat, and behaves like a rat… It’s probably a Republican operation.

  • It is obvious to all who look that this was politically motivated.
    What happened to the ministry that is promoting a GOP candidate and has called for its members to pray for the downfall of ACLU workers who challenged them? A blatantly obvious misuse of a tax exempt status. But it wasn’t toward the Bush WH so they get away with it or what? Just like the justification for impeachment…the more we look the more we find because the corruption is widespread and overwhelming.

  • One of the great faults of progressive, liberal and even reasonable people is a failure to understand that, for this administration, power is its own end.

    An investigation was possible, so it was instigated. Done. They do not place their actions in the context of what is acceptable and/or moral – they decide what will get them what they want and they act.

    That’s how we lost that first election… in a contest between consensus and hierarchical command structure, the drones generally win because they don’t do any soul-searching before they act.

  • So what’s new? Bully tactics seem the norm these days, and there is always talk, more stupid meeting to discuss the issue and no action. America is swimming in jello.

  • Are you kidding me? The Catholic bishop here in Wisconsin basically tells his congregation to vote for Bush or burn in hell, and the IRS does nothing. But the All Saints pastor makes much more circumspect comments, criticizing the policy, not the man, and he’s run through the wringer by the IRS?

    That reminds me of the story about how Nixon wanted “a real son of a bitch” in charge of the IRS, “some who would reward [his] friends and punish [his] enemies.”

  • Let’s call a spade a spade, and stop with the “I sure hope they aren’t doing…” tip-toe language.

    Once a pattern of selective or aberrant legal enforcement is established, as is the case here, it is clear that the IRS is abusing its powers in order to intimidate this church and force it to spend a significant amount of money to defend itself. It also sends a message to other churches that unless they hew the right-wing line, they had better keep their mouths shut.

    We have returned to an era of Nixonian abuse of power. The evidence is clear.

    I’m sure at some point we’ll see various enemy lists start popping up (above and beyond the TSA travel lists).

  • This church should contact its congressional representative and senators and demand them to investigate.

  • The morning after the ’04 election I asked a co-worker who he voted for. He said Bush. When I asked him why, he said he was told to vote for Bush by the pastor at his christian evangelical church in Pasadena. I’m still waiting for that investigation to begin…

  • We can put an end to this in 08 by voting these bastards out of power and leaning hard on our newly elected Democratic majority to investigate until every last one of them is in jail.

    We Californians need to lean on Feinstein especially hard. She is out in 2010 and apparently feels that she can do whatever she wants until then, including supporting Bush/Cheney policies to the letter.

    Speaking of Cheney, the Mrs will be in town Wednesday. Ayone planning a little welcome?

  • In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that ‘If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff the entire system will collapse’. U.S Senator Henry Bellmon 1969.

    Is this True? Lets take a look at the Internal Revenue Manual for an answer

    The manual states on page 1100-40.2 of April 21, 1989, Criminal Investigation Division, that:- “the Criminal Investigation Division enforces the criminal statutes applicable to income, estate, gift, employment, and excise tax laws … involving United States citizens, residing in foreign countries, and non resident aliens, subject to Federal income tax filing requirements, by developing information concerning alleged criminal violations thereof, evaluating allegations and indications of such violations, to determine investigations to be undertaken, investigating suspected criminal violations of such laws, recommending prosecution when warranted, and measuring effectiveness of the investigating process … ”
    __________________________________________________________________________________________
    So according to the manual, investigations are limited to American citizens outside the country, and non-resident subject to filing requirements. So where do 501© 3 Corporations fit into the scheme of things. For an answer lets consult the Current tax regulations.
    [Title 26, Volume 12] [Revised as of April 1, 2004] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 26CFR1.1441-9] PART 1_INCOME TAXES–Table of Contents Sec. 1.1441-9 Exemption from withholding on exempt income of a foreign tax-exempt organization, including foreign private foundations. (a) Exemption from withholding for exempt income. No withholding is required under section 1441(a) or 1442, and the regulations under those sections, on amounts paid to a foreign organization that is described in section 501(c) to the extent that the amounts are not income includable under section 512 in computing the organization’s unrelated business taxable income.
    This is the bluff folks! To get it the minds of the people that tax-exemption is the same as not taxable spelled out in the First Amendment. The tax being imposed is the Foreign Corporation Import and Excise Tax of 1939, simply termed as “Income Tax”. Churches are fooled into filing for exemption, and then are listed as Foreign Corporations, which can be REGULATED by the IRS.

  • Basic dirty trick: If you’re employing a dirty tactic and want to fend off potential criticism, beat them to the punch by pre-emptively accusing the other side of doing the same.

    From “fuzzy math” to voter fraud to various and sundry accusations of demagoguery, you see this pulled again and again if you look hard enough. One more way of drowning out specific misconduct in white noise, so that to the casual observer it all comes out as a wash. Even if the truth does “out” — which this still hasn’t and probably won’t, in terms of public awareness — the damage has already been done.

  • Comments are closed.