An acute case of ‘Bush fatigue’

When the president commuted Scooter Libby’s prison sentence, the conventional wisdom told us that the White House was anxious to score a few points with the far-right GOP base, which has slowly distanced itself from Bush over the last several months.

Byron York suggests today the commutation, if it was a political ploy, didn’t work.

Bush came up with a cramped, limited statement, commuting Libby’s jail term while keeping (at least for now) his conviction, a $250,000 fine that he has already paid and two years of probation. One didn’t have to read too far between the lines to guess that the president believes Libby to be guilty of perjury; just for good measure, Bush threw in some good words for Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald. The problem, the president said, wasn’t that Fitzgerald had gone on a three-year fishing expedition that netted only Libby, or that the Iraq war’s foes were using the CIA leak case to rehash their grievances against the original decision to invade; rather, the problem was simply that U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton’s sentence was “excessive.”

For many conservatives, it was exactly the wrong way to approach the problem. […]

In other words, if Bush had pardoned Libby because the CIA leak probe never should have happened, fine. But don’t play judge, Mr. President — that’s not your branch.

This is consistent with what we’ve been hearing most of the week. Bob Novak reported a couple of days ago that other than Libby, “hardly anybody else is all that happy” with Bush’s decision.

Similarly, the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page was in rare form this week, calling the commutation “a profile in non-courage.”

Frankly, I think the talk about Bush’s concern for the base is probably overwrought. The president wasn’t trying to impress deserting Republican activists; he was abusing his power to “shortcircuit the investigation of a crime to which he himself was quite likely a party, and to which, his vice president, who controls him, certainly was.”

Nevertheless, York’s piece does speak to a broader truth: even the president’s far-right flank is suffering from acute “Bush fatigue.”

York shares these perspectives:

All of this has left Republicans saying, at least among themselves, something blunt and devastating: It’s over.

“Bush fatigue has set in,” declares one plugged-in GOP activist.

“We’re ready for a new president,” says a former state Republican Party official in the South.

“There was affection,” opines a conservative strategist based well beyond the Beltway, “but now they’re in divorce court.” […]

“These days, the only time he gets support is when Democrats attack him,” says one Washington-based GOP strategist. But that will take him only so far. George W. Bush’s time to get big things done has passed. Even his most ardent fans, the ones who wish him the best, are looking forward to Jan. 20, 2009.

If his approval rating ever reaches 35% again, I’ll be very surprised.

here’s what’s most fascinating to me: “the only time he gets support is when Democrats attack him.”

a better window into exactly what is wrong with the right-wing movement in america you could hardly hope to find.

  • If you can get behind the wall at the NYT, read Frank Rich’s op-ed; he pretty much sums it all up as Bush’s inability to be anything more than a coward when things get tough. If you have no courage, what does that say about your convictions? Not a whole lot, in my book; for too long, people have confused Bush’s stubbornness with conviction and principle, two things with which – if you look at his life – Bush is wholly unfamiliar.

    I guess when you’ve never paid a price for your mistakes, when you were bailed out in a way that allowed you to think you had made no mistakes, that is what you know, and that is what you live, so Bush has probably been saving a version of himself each and every time he has bailed out or made excuses for or even rewarded those around him who have made huge “mistakes.”

    All that aside, I feel like this has been the longest presidential term ever. Has it really only been 2 1/2 years since the 2004 election? All I can say is that we must be living them like we are dogs, because it feels more like about 17 1/2 years.

    The fatigue is in part what the reult of having been engaged in an endless session of “no, you can’t – yes I can” with no “parental” intervention. The only way to end that is to exercise that last resort of impeachment. I think that a lot of people will not be so much demoralized by that, but energized with a sense of “finally, someone is taking charge of this mess.”

    And far from interfering with the 2008 campaign, I think it will help clarify the positions of the candidates, will help us get a better sense of how they perceive presidential power and the rule of law. After what Bush ahs done, I think it’s pretty important to know that the next president does not have delusions of grandeur and power that far exceed constitutional limits, and it would be nice if we could get that settled before January of 2009.

  • I am glad you put this post up, because I’ve been wanting to mention something I saw on cable news this week. I don’t have cable, but I was visiting family for the Fourth and made up for its absence in my household.

    Glenn Beck was subbing for Paula Zahn on CNN. I couldn’t believe my ears; he was opposed to the Cheney/Bush commutation of Scooter’s sentence.

    I fear I may hack off a lot of people who watch this program regularly because as you know, I`m a conservative, but conservatives aren`t going to like this. I want to talk about Scooter Libby and how he is not going to jail. And we`ll start with the point tonight.

    Punishment without consistency is not justice. It is bias. But that`s not only unfair; I believe it`s un-American. And here`s how I got there.

    First of all, I think we should start with Scooter Libby. Scooter, a guy, a grown man who chooses to go by the name Scooter? I think we should lock him up for that alone.

    But more to the point, Scooter Libby may have lived his life in Washington and the life of a Washington elite. But he committed a lowly crime, lying like a kid, blaming his dog for eating his homework.

    Libby was tried for his crime. And a jury of his peers said he should go and do the time. But his life of privilege and entitlement got him a real-life “get out of jail free” card.

    After President Bush made his decision behind the closed doors of the Oval Office, he issued this following statement, quote, “I respect the jury`s verdict. But I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive.” Really? Wow, that`s great.

    Let me ask you this, Mr. President. If I or any other American had been given the same sentence for the same crime, would you have been so quick to get out a big presidential eraser and erase my jail time? I don`t think so.

    And by the way, if you truly understand what an excessive sentence is, you should be taking a look at that 11-year prison term handed out for our border agents Ramos and Compean. Oh, wait — no, hang on. You still refuse to get involved in those cases.

    By undermining the judicial process, you have confirmed our worst fears about the beltway boys club yet again. The — it`s really all about who you know. That`s what gets you off the hook for what you did.

    He then went on to complain that Dems were playing politics with the decision. Nonetheless, I thought his break with BushCo over this was remarkable.

    BTW, CB I agree completely that the primary purpose of this commutation was saving Junior’s and Deadeye’s scrawny asses and not to please the base. But I also think at a minimum Rove expected the base to give them a pass on this and perhaps to give them a bit of a boost. My foray into LGF, Free Republic and Power Line suggest that at least with the rank-and-file wingnuts that has been the case. It is with the higher functioning troglodytes, such as Beck and the ones that you mention, that BushCo is experiencing the backlash over the commutation.

  • I don’t think the Democrats should let the Republicans off the hook with regard to their support for GWB, Cheney and his administration during the last eight years. The Dems should hammer away at the idea that a vote for the Republican candidate next year represents an extension of the Bush administration and its policies.

    The Dems should especially focus on the fact that Bush is not only a Republican but a conservative. Every day, the Dems should try to remind the public that Bush and Cheney are the best that conservatism has to offer this country.

    Press each GOP candidate as often as possible as to why George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, conservative Republicans, have been good for the country for the last eight years. Get them to praise Bush and Cheney on record.

    Bush and Cheney=Conservatism. Don’t let the conservatives get away with saying anything else.

    Campaign slogan: Bush and Cheney. Do we really want another conservative running this country?

  • We need to reinforce and amplify this meme. If you have Repulican representation in congress, call them NOW.

    Earlier this week I called my Republican congressman’s Washington office to express my outrage over the Libby commutation. Because it was a slow day in DC, I got through to his legislative director, a senior aide.

    As I made my argument, he repeatedly offered the standard talking points in rebuttal. These folks don’t think they’re wrong.

    Finally, I mentioned that perception is important in electoral politics. (I’ve heard it said that in politics, perception is reality.) And, that the cloud of perception currently hanging over the president and his party is someting all Republican office holders/seekers should be very worried about.

    Judging from a noticeable change in his tone of voice and demeanor, I’m pretty sure I scored a point.

    Now is the time to pile on.

  • I totally agree with your comment, Mrs Panstreppon. The Republicans are only offering “more of the same.”

  • Bush fatigue? If you keep your head in your ass for 6+ years, sooner or later the stench will get to you.

  • If only our “Clinton fatigue” was as strong as their “Bush fatigue,” then maybe we could finally shove these two obnoxious clans of narcissists, and their psychotic retainers and flunkies and loyalists, off the national stage.

    Yeah, yeah, I know: the Clintons aren’t close to as bad as the Bushes. But I’m increasingly convinced that many things they did in the ’90s set up the much worse abuses of the Bush Gang in this lamentable decade. And I think Hillary has the same sense of entitlement and “will to power” that’s made Dubsy-doodle so frightening. She won’t be as incompetent with the Presidential Superpowers–but the powers aren’t justified in the first place.

  • “Bush fatigue has set in,” declares one plugged-in GOP activist.

    So. Trillions of dollars spent on a fucked up war that should have never started. And the only reason we’re in the current clusterfuck is because BushCo ignored Wilson and fucked up an undercover operation designed to net terrorists to get back at him.
    And the fact that BushCo decided to ignore that little memo ObL attacking the US with planes the Clinton Admin. left behind.
    Hey, has anyone seen the Bill of Rights lately? Check Shrubster’s bathroom.
    Dick Cheney.
    Alberto Gonzales.
    Donald Rumsfeld.
    Has anyone seen Osama bin Laden lately? Check Dick’s undisclosed location.

    None of that shit causes Bush Fatigue among the GOPs, but suddenly they’re all so weary of the man because he commuted Libby’s sentence.

    Fuck ’em. And if their idea of a “new president” includes any of the current gaggle of mentally defective, base courting sadists running for Pres, fuck ’em with a rusty farm implement.

    But I’m increasingly convinced that many things they did in the ’90s set up the much worse abuses of the Bush Gang in this lamentable decade.

    Strange, when it seems every other key player in the current Admin worked for a previous Republican Admin, usually the most infamous one of all. But could you name a couple of things that Clinton did (even unintentionally) that set things up for Bush II?

  • Bush=Incompetent Coward, unbridled greed, extreme ignorance, conceit, & arrogance. Ops does that = conservative to?

  • Comments are closed.