An ignoble anniversary

The past few years, we’ve taken to highlighting certain anniversaries, many of them painful. The fifth anniversary of 9/11, the fourth anniversary of the Iraqi invasion, the third anniversary of the “Mission Accomplished” speech, etc.

It hasn’t received much recognition in previous years, but today, Aug. 6, is a noteworthy anniversary as well — six years ago today, the president, on vacation in Crawford, was handed an intelligence briefing document. It was titled, “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US.”

In 2004, Larry Johnson, a former CIA officer and the State Department’s counterterrorism chief, explained that a Presidential Daily Briefing like that one should have sent Bush back to the Oval Office. Johnson, who’d written dozens of PDBs during Bush 41’s presidency, said the documents are usually brief and dispassionate. The one on Aug. 6, 2001, was a page and a half, with a title meant to capture the president’s attention. “That’s the intelligence-community equivalent of writing War and Peace,” Johnson said.

Johnson added that when he read the declassified document, “I said, ‘Holy smoke!’ This is such a dead-on ‘Mr. President, you’ve got to do something!’ ”

He didn’t.

[A]n unnamed CIA briefer who flew to Bush’s Texas ranch during the scary summer of 2001, amid a flurry of reports of a pending al-Qaeda attack, to call the president’s attention personally to the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo titled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US.” Bush reportedly heard the briefer out and replied: “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.”

Top intelligence officials — George Tenet, Richard Clarke, and others — were running around with their “hair on fire,” warning that al Qaeda was about to unleash a major attack. Bush, tragically, treated his intelligence briefings about Osama bin Laden as perfunctory chores that he had to endure. Based on the “covered your ass” comment, it was almost as if the president was humoring the CIA briefer.

Slate’s Fred Kaplan explained a while back:

The revelation came this morning, when CIA Director George Tenet was on the stand. Timothy Roemer, a former Democratic congressman, asked him when he first found out about the report from the FBI’s Minnesota field office that Zacarias Moussaoui, an Islamic jihadist, had been taking lessons on how to fly a 747. Tenet replied that he was briefed about the case on Aug. 23 or 24, 2001.

Roemer then asked Tenet if he mentioned Moussaoui to President Bush at one of their frequent morning briefings. Tenet replied, “I was not in briefings at this time.” Bush, he noted, “was on vacation.” He added that he didn’t see the president at all in August 2001. During the entire month, Bush was at his ranch in Texas. “You never talked with him?” Roemer asked. “No,” Tenet replied. By the way, for much of August, Tenet too was, as he put it, “on leave.”

And there you have it. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice has made a big point of the fact that Tenet briefed the president nearly every day. Yet at the peak moment of threat, the two didn’t talk at all. At a time when action was needed, and orders for action had to come from the top, the man at the top was resting undisturbed.

Throughout that summer, we now well know, Tenet, Richard Clarke, and several other officials were running around with their “hair on fire,” warning that al-Qaida was about to unleash a monumental attack. On Aug. 6, Bush was given the now-famous President’s Daily Brief (by one of Tenet’s underlings), warning that this attack might take place “inside the United States.” For the previous few years — as Philip Zelikow, the commission’s staff director, revealed this morning — the CIA had issued several warnings that terrorists might fly commercial airplanes into buildings or cities.

And now, we learn today, at this peak moment, Tenet hears about Moussaoui. Someone might have added 2 + 2 + 2 and possibly busted up the conspiracy. But the president was down on the ranch, taking it easy. Tenet wasn’t with him. Tenet never talked with him. Rice — as she has testified — wasn’t with Bush, either. He was on his own and, willfully, out of touch.

Six years ago today, Bush received one of the most important warnings any president has ever received — and he told the CIA official who handed him the warning, “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.”

An ignoble anniversary, indeed.

Why should Bush have headed back to DC? 9/11 would give his neocons the “Pearl Harbor” they believed would catalyze their plan for world domination. see page 51 of the Project for a New American Century:

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor”

  • Based on the “covered your ass” comment, it was almost as if the president was humoring the CIA briefer.

    Duh. Bush knew something the briefer didn’t. His own brother had recently taken over security at the WTC and was probably laying explosives at that very moment.

    You know when you’re playing a video game and you come up against the edge of the fantasy world such that your character can’t go further in a particular direction? Or have you ever seen the Truman Show? He hits the edge of the studio his whole life has been spent. Or have you ever seen a turtle in a box? She’ll find the edge of the box and follow it to a corner where she stops.

    If the Carpetbagger Report were a video game, the truth about 9-11 would be the edge of the fantasy universe, beyond which there’s nowhere to go. With respect to our fine host, I think there are truths people here are afraid to know, so we keep the blinders up and pretend to play a game on the margins. But that’s all it is. A game.

    And I will play along too, because I’m also afraid of the things I believe. And I’ll pretend America still exists, because wrapping myself in that illusion is the only thing that feels like protection. I’m sorry George Washington. You gave us something great, and we’re throwing it all away now.

  • Did Bush let it happen? If he did, it is no different than if he had made it happen.

    Mike Vick was paid more in 2005 ($23M) than was allocated for the 9/11 Commission ($15M –originally a paltry $3M). Now you tell me where this country’s priorities are.

    Re-investigate 9/11. Impeach the Bush Laden Crime Family.

  • So that’s why Trent Lott told us last week that being in Washington during August was so dangerous because he knows too that everyone is on vacation like 2001. Shrub with his scrub – let’s hope the scrub doesn’t fight back.

  • Hanlon’s Razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    If it wasn’t sheer laziness that caused him to blow off the PDB, what was probably going through Bush’s mind was how cool a customer he could be, unruffled by the stuff that had all the peons in a fit. Terrorism wasn’t on his mind in the summer of 2001, nor on most anyone else’s; we were occupied with shark attacks and stem cells.

    If only Al Gore had been president… he would’ve known that the “hair on fire” warnings weren’t just bureaucrats making busy-work, but urgent warnings that demanded immediate action. Bush couldn’t tell the difference. This is why we must make sure that the presidential candidates can demonstrate the experience & wisdom to respond to such warnings. (Asking them “How would you have reacted to the August 6 PDB?” is not the way to find out.)

  • Again, impeachment should stay on the agenda whether Congress and the “pragmatic” pundits like Mike Tomasky want it there or not.

  • Being unable to wrap my head around any of the broader conspiracy theories, I’ll suffice to say that this anniversary showcases the malignant neglect and hubris that has been a hallmark of Bush’s entire reign.

    The contempt Bush shows with his remark about “ass-covering” perfectly illustrates his contempt for all things government: Bush will not believe that people working in government are actually trying hard to accomplish a noble mission.

    But perhaps more than all of these things, this anniversary shows the poor judgment of a man who has never shown good judgment in his life. As an electorate, WE will now need to show better judgment than we have in the past two presidential elections and elect someone better at reading the tea leaves of our national interest and who does not subscribe to the failed ideologies of conservatism and neoconservatism.

  • I’ll give you another anniversary; one that, although the original event hasn’t happened yet, will be received with a sense of freedom – of having been delivered from a scourge that polluted and soiled all that was good. Recurrences of this anniversary will be celebrated with joy, tempered with a resolve to never again let things get so out of control.

    That’ll be the day they cover Bush’s ass. With dirt. Six feet of it.

  • I have never heard the situation — or how it feels when one encounters the fullness of it — expressed better than Haik Bedrosian has at #2.

    In thinking about what Haik has written and how we might return to the game as meaningful players, I was reminded of a Star Trek film (episode?) in which Captain Kirk, when confronted with a no-win scenario, refused to accept it and instead changed the rules. A fantasy notion from a fantasy film? Perhaps. Then again, if enough of us — some critical mass — were to reach the edge Haik describes, we might be able to change the rules enough to return to normal play within the boundaries of the game. The only alternative is to surrender, and with a daughter days away from starting college, I just can’t bring myself to that.

    Thanks, Haik. Nicely done.

  • “In a cruel ironic twist – August 6th, 1945.”

    I thought about that as well — two events, on the same day, that both wound up changing the world every day afterward. And neither for the better.

    Chance/fate can be cruel like that …

  • Yes, Haik has it the way I see it.
    If the Carpetbagger Report were a video game, the truth about 9-11 would be the edge of the fantasy universe, beyond which there’s nowhere to go.

    Not CR’s fault, nor am I impugning the site at all. This mindset is endemic, because few wish to go there. Not only does the emporer have no clothes, the emporer is a monster in the closet or under the bed, and to make it all go away we merely have to shut our eyes and repeat a mantra like Dorothy’s in Wizard of Oz.

  • Every time I read some breathless assertion about the uncovered “truth” of 9/11, I want to retch.

    While I don’t doubt the intentions, all you do in raising the conspiracy notion is let that smug royalist prick and his ideology-blinded enablers off the hook. The “covered your ass” comment should have been in every John Kerry campaign ad in 2004. A CIA briefer, someone who has devoted his life to the safety of this country, all but screams “DO SOMETHING, MR. PRESIDENT!” and Bush gives him the metaphorical finger and turns back to his brush-clearing and pre-season football.

    And then he has the unbearable audacity to demagogue the tragedy into political gain, expended on a ruinous, tragic war and the most fucked-up domestic “agenda” any of us have ever known.

    During the ’04 campaign, Bush was famously asked if he thought he’d made any mistakes. I wonder if “Well, I should have done something about that PDB” even popped into what passes for his mind. I’m not sure if it’s more upsetting that he did, or that he didn’t.

    You don’t need to put Bush or the neo-cons or any shadowy operatives “behind” 9/11 to make him a monster. Just look at what he did–or didn’t do–in response to the PDB, and then how he exploited the tragedy to such disastrous consequences.

  • The “covered your ass” comment should have been in every John Kerry campaign ad in 2004.

    That would’ve been quite a trick, considering that the quote wasn’t reported until Ron Suskind’s The One-Percent Doctrine in 2006.

    Speaking of that doctrine (without having read the book), it’s exactly the sort of response one would have out of guilt. In other words, the massive under-reaction to the August 6th PDB becomes a massive over-reaction to end all terror, everywhere (and still not accomplish much toward that end).

  • Tenet can be simply explained away as a Clinton appointee, that may be why he was kept on, but dubya’s smart ass reply is a composite of his attitude towards everything from that day to Katrina to taking at least one whole day to ascertain the fact that a bridge collapsed. No Ivy League schools for my kids…

  • Everyone seems to ignore the possibility that Bush already knew 9/11 was going to happen. How come the memo didn’t say “Bin Ladin, your buddy, your Dad’s friend’s nephew, is going to….” It goes right along with his behavior in the classroom photo op when informed, not once but twice, that the country was under attack. I’m surprised he didn’t say, “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.” He just sat there. I know of no one…no one who would have reacted that way when told his country was under attack.

    Makes more sense to explain his reaction in Crawford and at the classroom photo op to say he already knew about it, already knew it was going to happen. Maybe that was what he was doing at Crawford in August. Love to see a record of his calls during that time period.

  • Thanks. My PDB blogswarm post focused on the Bush briefing as well, but I appreciate the details on Tenet. I also linked Rice’s 9/11 Commission testimony – I recoiled anew watching that “historical document” line and her assertions that the PDB “was not a warning.” Utterly shameless. (I like the new look here, BTW.)

  • One of the interesting things about liberals is the renewed faith they have in the CIA. It is misplaced. The Hiroshima Day memo was all about ass-covering by a broken and dysfunctional agency that had been thoroughly and relentlessly outwitted and outfought by Men in Caves. You don’t want to see this because of your blinkered partisanship, but there you have it.

    The CIA is the same Agency that ignored Ike’s suggestion that Mossadegh be bought off with 100 million dollars, that turned covert operations over to Bobby Kennedy and became a regular Murder, Inc., that blew every covert operation it ever tried to run against Stalin, that created a phantom “Missile Gap” in the late fifties and served to undermine Ike’s early attempts at detente with Kruschev, that recommended that Diem be assassinated, that tried to overthrow Sukarno, that worked to undermine Greek democracy in the Colonel’s Coup in 1967, that failed to foresee the Tet Offensive, the 1956 War, the 1967 War, the 1973 October War, aand Saddam’s Invasion of Kuwait. During the Clinton years, the Iranians rolled up our entire operation there. It was awful. I could come up with others, but you get the point.

    Yet you people have faith in this agency because Democratic party sympathizers within the agency have been leaking what the agency has been able to keep classified to the New York Times in order to embarrass George Bush. Yet you tolerate, and continue to enable, the risible incompetence of this laughingstock of an intelligence agency that couldn’t put the hearse in the right place in a two car funeral.

    The CIA isn’t evil. They were never evil. Anyone fighting Joe Stalin and Mao had his heart in the right place. But they were and remain incapable of penetrating foreign countries and collecting intelligence.

    Think of the CIA as the hook and ladder truck that comes up to a burning building. Then, twenty clowns get out and run around doing nothing and pointing in fifty different directions. Then, the clowns get in the hook and ladder truck and drive away. Fifteen minutes later, the VBIED contracted out by Bin Laden and driven by some hapless suicide bomber comes up to the burning building to finish the job.

    And it does.

    You get the picture of the effectiveness of the CIA in modern times. Now you may understand how the AQ Khan network so easily outwitted Valerie Plame’s office for so many years.

    Tim Weiner, in his monumental history of the CIA, Legacy of Ashes , puts paid to the Liberal Mythos that the August 6th PDB was worth anything more that a warm bucket of spit. To wit:

    “The agency never had answered a question put to it by President Bush: coulda an attack come in the United States? Now was the time: on August 6th, the president’s daily brief began with the headline “Bin Laden Determined to Strike US.” The warning beneath the headline was a very weak piece of reporting. The freshest intelligence in it dated from 1999. It was a work of history, not a news bulletin. The president continued his vacation, chopping brush in Crawford, unwinding for five weeks.”

    Reporting that dates from 1999 wasn’t much help in 2001. Yet that was the thin reed the CIA was leaning on.

    The CIA understood that it was the first line of defense, and it failed. And so it ran to the Democrats for protection. And you have protected this gang of mediocrities. Meanwhile, the nation gets substandard results that make the Guatamalan Coup look like an act of brilliant statecraft.

    Democrats have been enabling this kind of nonsense because you believe it serves you politically. If you wish to place party ahead of country, fine. But understand that as long as Democrats continue to tolerate an agency that produces these kind of results, the national interest will continue to suffer. When both parties set partisanship aside and demand results-firm intelligence instead of faith-based intelligence (a la, WMD in Iraq that never were, or weak reporting on August 6th), then you’ll have a CIA that may begin to work. As long as Democrats refuse to hold the CIA accountable because you don’t like the guy in the White House, you’ll get these results.

  • At my place, I have not only a post but a blogroll of the 40 or so bloggers who have participated in the swarm. So if you have any thoughts to add, it’s not too late to join the swarm. Thanks for jumping in with this piece, Steve.

  • As we read in Against All Enemies, Richard Clarke had been demanding a meeting with Bush, Cheney, Rice, and Rummy since the inaguration. Something major pertaining to 9/11 showed up in over 40 PBDs that year. A few months ago Condi Rice claimed that 9/11 was Clinton’s fault b/c he failed to give Bush warning on Al Qaeda.

    Richard Clarke was that warning.

  • On August 6th, 2007 at 3:15 pm, bjobotts said:
    Everyone seems to ignore the possibility that Bush already knew 9/11 was going to happen. How come the memo didn’t say “Bin Ladin, your buddy, your Dad’s friend’s nephew, is going to….” It goes right along with his behavior in the classroom photo op when informed, not once but twice, that the country was under attack. I’m surprised he didn’t say, “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.” He just sat there. I know of no one…no one who would have reacted that way when told his country was under attack.

    Makes more sense to explain his reaction in Crawford and at the classroom photo op to say he already knew about it, already knew it was going to happen.

    That’s truly the only time he’s ever looked as if the wheels were turning inside.

  • Why would anyone expect that Bush would understand the gravity of the PDB? He had no relevant experience.

    Voters must understand that they need to choose someone qualified as president.

    I’m not sure this has really sunk in, even now after Iraq.

  • The reason why he did not give a damn was:

    1) They already new soemthing was going to happen.
    2) They wanted it to happen.

    This was Bushco’s Pearl Habor and they had no reason to stop it. Does he really give a shit about human life? I think the only thing they were really surprised about was scope, how easily they got four jets.

    Nothing like a little fear to take control of things.

  • Anyone trying to summarize “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” with one sentence is being dishonest.

    Anyway, Bush didn’t react in that classroom because he had no idea what to do. He was a stump on a stage of national tragedy and horror. I don’t understand why, if he knew exactly what was going to happen, he wouldn’t rush out and act manly and leader-like (such as his hero, Howdy Doody), instead of sitting in a room staring off into the distance while thousands were trapped in the fiery towers?

    Those nine minutes will live in infamy.

  • We need to get past discussing 9/11 already. Why should the rest of us play along with their attempt to keep all of us in a permanent state of terror. They ignored the warnings but have never mis an opportunity since the attack to remind us about it. If the terrorists goal was to terrorize us BV$H is obviously working for them because thats precisely what he’s been doing ever since.

  • What a bunch of Colossal Losers, perhaps instaed of trying to put blame, you could do something constructive with your lives. Instead of blowing smoke up some bloggers rear-end about how ‘right-on” he is. Just another “crybaby” trying to convince people that all of a sudden, it’s “one big conspiracy”

  • 6 years today Bush received this briefing???
    “The fifth anniversary of 9/11”?????? Get your facts straight. It will be the 6th anniversary. So if you are trying to say Mr. Bush new a year in advanced you are way off course. Your beloved Mr. Clinton would have been in office a year before 9/11. and by the way how many briefings did he receive about Bin Laden? The only plan you Democraps have is we are not Bush. So cuddle up with Michael Moore and stoke each others hair. To be harboring on who to blame is ridiculous. It happened, remember it and move on. How many attacks have their been on the US since Bush took charge??? exactly. Too bad he can’t run for a third. God speed to all of our Armed Forces.

  • At Pearl Harbor there were no aircraft carriers or submarines, just vintage battleships and cruisers. In 1966, my U.S. Hx. professor…not an American, said Roosevelt knew it was coming and let it happen to create a war hysteria and thus allow Roosevelt to enter the war and save Europe…and the Far East…for U.S. based corporations. Other presidents have used other “incidents” to go to war, e.g. the Battleship Maine and the Gulf of Tonkin.
    bush wanted to give his father and Carlyle (representing Unocal) their pipeline through Afganistan to Karachi…and the biggest prize, a fire sale of the nationalized Iraqi oil and oil infrastructue to his Texas buddies.
    It’s how the big boys operate. The rest of us are surfs.

  • The BEST Basketball Skill Improving Workout System is at: basketballworkout(dot)com
    This workout will get you great skills as well as get you in great shape and it’s fun too!

  • whatever…yes a third term…interesting. I’ll put my Clinton (bill) against your bush (gw) for all the chips. gw is a miserable goon working for his corporate monkeys and evangelical osteritches. The gw legacy will be the terms that almost brought down the worlds only superpower and installed China and the new multi nations of Islam as the new world order.

  • I warned all of my friends about Bush in 2000. He, and more likely Cheney and the neocons were behind every step of 9-11. Can you imagine the billions of dollars these folks have earned from this fiasco!!
    Selling America’s soul for a buck. we are doomed. Remember the Romans?

  • I couldn’t help but reply to the ugly comments of 8/6 to 8/8. Coming from under the rocks and dark caves , the Bush hatred is spewing from frothy caverns of wild eyed, snarling jackals circling their prey while cowering in the dark shodows, creatures await their turn at the carcas. Shamelessly this cowardly act of selfish gorging of hatred permeates these mindless lemmings void , avoiding at all cost, their patriotic duty to lend a positive hand to the struggle this country faces in defeating the nations enemy , the terrorists, led by the Al Qaeda. This treasoness act of defeatism by the unpatriotic isolationists, led by the liberal media, have swallowed the hate propaganda, hook, line and sinker. Should they prevail in the coming elections, we may be doomed to witness the beginning of the crumbling of the greatest democratic society, by the cancerous complacency and apathy, creating a state of malaise and dependence. The next step in this evolution could be a way of life under a brutal dictatorship. To quote the British Parliamentarian, Ed Burke, 1729-1797, “All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” With the assistance of the entire nation this struggle would have been a thing of the past, with victory for all. These hatemongers are more enemy than Osama Bin Laden himself.

  • whatever said:


    6 years today Bush received this briefing???
    “The fifth anniversary of 9/11″?????? Get your facts straight. It will be the 6th anniversary. So if you are trying to say Mr. Bush new a year in advanced you are way off course.

    You cannot read. The article says (correctly) that fifth anniversary of 9/11 WAS ALREADY highlighted. Therefore, yes, the sixth anniversary WILL BE soon, in September of this year. He was not trying to say Bush “new” (you mean “knew”) a year in advance.

  • Can you say “criminal neglegence”.

    Wanna bet that Bush was drunk that morning – Because of Bush’s usual nasty swaggering comments. “Now you’ve covered your ass” is something only a drunken swaggert would say.

    9/11 commisson said everything too – Rice was asked: “What “flies” did Bush swat?” Rice couldn’t mention a single so-call “terrorist” fly. You know that Rice and Bush just made that particular comment up out of thin air.

  • Comments are closed.