And the next Attorney General is…

Following up on widely reported rumors yesterday, the White House is poised to announce that Michael Mukasey, a former judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, will be nominated to replace Alberto Gonzales as the Attorney General. The announcement may come as early as this morning.

The nomination of Mukasey, considered an authority on national security issues, could come as early as this morning, the sources said. The White House was already seeking over the weekend to tamp down concern in the conservative legal world about Mukasey’s views, assuring allies that he shares Bush’s views on executive power and the need for strong action against terrorists.

In picking Mukasey, Bush would sidestep the uproar that would have erupted in the Senate had he chosen one of the early front-runners, former solicitor general Theodore B. Olson. Some conservatives made clear their puzzlement that Bush was passing over one of their favorites for someone who has been praised by Senate liberals and their allies.

But the White House apparently decided that Mukasey is conservative enough, and that it is important to restore confidence in the Justice Department as quickly as possible, with a choice that could garner bipartisan support. The department has been in turmoil under Alberto R. Gonzales, the Bush confidant whose firing of nine U.S. attorneys and the ensuing controversy led to his resignation last month.

The president’s goal, apparently, was to find a “confirmable” nominee, and Mukasey seems to fit the bill. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) released a statement last night, describing Mukasey as “the kind of nominee who would put rule of law first and show independence from the White House.” He added, “[H]e’s a lot better than some of the other names mentioned and he has the potential to become a consensus nominee.”

Indeed, this seems to be the overwhelming attitude among Bush administration critics. Senate Dems appear relieved, the progressive Alliance for Justice finds Mukasey tolerable, and People for the American Way’s Ralph Neas said, “He seems like a bona fide conservative Republican, not a right-wing ideologue. He seems like someone who would attract strong bipartisan support and who could help restore public confidence in the Department of Justice.” What’s more, Glenn Greenwald explained in an important post yesterday that Mukasey’s rulings in the Padilla trial in 2002 and 2003 offer some encouragement about his willingness to stand up to the administration.

The right, meanwhile, remains divided.

In an effort to assuage conservative concerns, the White House apparently first leaked word of the Mukasey nomination to the Weekly Standard, and Bill Kristol endorsed the nominee online Saturday night.

That may not be enough to please the GOP base, which wanted to see Ted Olson get the nod. There’s been quite a bit of grumbling on the right since Kristol’s piece ran, and the Wall Street Journal noted “some conservatives already labeling Mukasey as ‘Harriet,’ a reference to Bush’s ill-advised attempt to put his friend and personal lawyer, Harriet Miers, on the Supreme Court.”

But as we talked about yesterday, it’s hard to imagine the right derailing this nomination. In fact, I suspect conservative “concerns” won’t amount to much. Senate Republicans are likely to give Bush what he wants; enough of the institutional right is already falling into place; and Bush only has a year left in office anyway, making Mukasey a short-timer from the outset.

It seems to me that the only real surprise here is that the Bush White House decided to sidestep a confirmation fight with Senate Democrats. Administration officials leaked word that Michael Chertoff was the leading candidate for the job, and Dems balked. Bushies then said Olson was in line for the job, and Dems balked again. The GOP base seemed to be genuinely looking forward to a full-scale, knock-down-drag-out fight over who would run the Justice Department.

And then Bush did something he never does: he backed down. Instead of picking a fight he picked a qualified nominee who’s likely to draw bipartisan support.

One cautionary note: Mukasey may be about the best we can expect from this White House, but that doesn’t make him some kind of moderate. He’s a conservative Republican, playing an active role in Rudy Giuliani’s nutty presidential campaign, and Senate Dems need to scrutinize his record carefully. For that matter, the Justice Department, decimated by Gonzales’ corruption and incompetence, still owes lawmakers quite a bit of information about unresolved scandals. Getting cooperation from Mukasey should be an important part of the process.

That said, all in all, I look at this as a rare victory over an obstinate White House.

I don’t care if the Cheney Administration was able to resurrect Mother Teresa and nominate her for Attorney General. I don’t trust a goddamn soul that would be a party to this cabal.

  • Don’t any other progressives share my alarm about Mukasey?

    The White House was already seeking over the weekend to tamp down concern in the conservative legal world about Mukasey’s views, assuring allies that he shares Bush’s views on executive power and the need for strong action against terrorists.

    If the italicized phrase is true about Mukasey, it doesn’t MATTER what his other views are. He won’t reign in Bush’s illegal agenda. Bush won’t nominate anybody that he thinks would stand in his way.

    Congress shouldn’t be so damned complacent about anything Bush does.

  • Mukasey isn’t great (and his much reported and lauded “expertise on terrorism” is just code, as anney points out, for a Bushian view on executive war powers), but he is less partisan than some of the others on the list.

    The big take away here, however, that I certainly hope Reid (and others) learn is that if you send consistent, strong signals up front, you really can make some change in the dynamics. If only Reid were this strong, consistent, and preemptive on issues of life and death in Iraq. . .

  • “Beware the ideologue bearing gifts.”

    This nomination does not fit with the nearly seven years of governmental malfeasance delivered upon the Republic and her People by this administration. It’s like a three-sided puzzle piece being applied to a five-sided gap in a puzzle that’s only lacking one piece to be complete. And apparently, the right thinks this about as much as I do—which poses an obstacle not terribly unlike the “Harriet” controversy.

    Watch the proceedings carefully—and watch the rightwing blogs as well. This may simply be a gambit to keep the seat warm of Olson, who could be summarily nominated to a “recess vacancy” once Congress goes home for Christmas….

  • During the confirmation hearings, a promise should be extracted from Mukasey that he will turn over all documents that have been requested and will cooperate with all ongoing investigations of the DOJ’s activities during the Gonzales era.

    Of course he can always renege on those promises after he takes office, but if he does his credentials as a liar will be established early.

  • I guess Mukasey is about the least terrible choice to serve in a placeholder capacity.

    That the WH appears to be conceding worries me a little, unless they already know that Mukasey will get blocked by the Republicans, and somehow we will get punk’d again.

  • I never looked forward to the end of Administration as much as this one.
    The Bushie and the Right kept congress based on fear. “Keep them
    scared early and often”… that worked for a bit. In the end their corruption
    and pure greed for exclusive executive power(turns out they could have
    gotten authorizations for most of what they wanted to anyhow, from their
    compliant congress), and incompetence, the Republican party lost both
    houses of Congress. If a Democrat is elected president and pick up some
    more Senate seats, Karl Rove’s tranformation of the government to Repulicans for a generation will have not happened.

    Oh wait! What got them power ultimately made them lose the same power.
    Fear, Fear, Fear. Americans don’t buy it any longer.

    John

  • I don’t know what kind of AG he will make, but I don’t envy him the job. Talk about being between a rock and a hard place. First, he goes into the job know he has a little over a year (i.e. he is a place holder). Second, the AGs office is in crappy shape and there is like not anything in the way of good morale. Third, he isn’t buddy buddy with Dubya which puts him outside the loop both personally and professionally (as he has proven less than subserviant to Bush administration goals). Fourth, he has to deal with a less than subservient Congress (as opposed to a Congress run by Republicans).

    No his year+ on the job will not be easy.

  • “Bush only has a year left in office anyway, making Mukasey a short-timer from the outset.”

    Maybe. On the other hand, Mukasey worked with Rudy Giuliani at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in his early career, and has been active in the Giuliani campaign since retiring from the bench. The White House is probably considering the fact that, by placing Mukasey as AG at the end of this administration, it’s leaving him well-positioned to remain in that role or to step up to a Cabinet position should Giuliani win the 2008 election.

  • The White House did a curious thing by leaking a string of so-called favorites for the post of AG and waiting to see the public reaction. Chertoff and Olson didn’t pass the smell test in the public so the White House that reputedly doesn’t read the polls was actively testing the public waters before making their decision. This is a telling sign.

    It’s a relief to see they seem to be going wih someone who is outside of Bush’s inner circle for a change. There are either no rabid Bushies left or the Bush White House is finally losing some of its in-your-face attitude.

  • Instead of picking a fight he picked a qualified nominee who’s likely to draw bipartisan support.

    I suspect this is because Turd Blossom is gone now.

  • With Rove and Gonzales gone the WH can keep the investigations chasing them and does not need such a strong protector at the DoJ except as regards the eavesdropping and wiretapping FISA law breaking and Mukasey is strong on executive power in these areas. It’s enough that the WH no longer needs to worry about the investigations and will get out of office scott free. Bush is not making this nomination because of anything that has to do with the Democrats or the republican base…it is just the road of least resistance to protect himself from accountability…Pelosi wins…no accountability.

  • You’re leaving out the twist: the just-announced acting AG (can’t remember his name) is apparently a certified corrupt wingnut. This makes the strategy clear: put pressure on the Dems to avoid a drawn-out hearing process with embarrassing questions/subpoenas r/t DOJ corruption, since that would leave the wingnut in longer, presumably with a mandate to screw up the DOJ even further before Mukasey comes on board. There’s always a malevolent purpose with these guys.

  • Comments are closed.