Annapolis and Israel and ‘gang rape’ … oh my

Frank J. Gaffney Jr., president of the far-right Center for Security Policy and a columnist for the conservative Washington Times, devoted his latest piece to denouncing the Middle East peace meeting at the Naval Academy in Annapolis today. That’s not particularly surprising.

What is surprising is just how far Gaffney was willing to go. Robert Farley calls these the three most “hyperbolic paragraphs ever,” and he may very well be right.

It is fitting Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice chose the U.S. Naval Academy for the venue of today’s so-called Mideast peace conference. The reputation of that extraordinary institution in Annapolis has been sullied in recent years by a succession of rapes of young women.

Despite official efforts to low-ball its significance, Miss Rice’s conclave is shaping up to be a gang-rape of a nation on a scale not seen since Munich in 1938, when the British and French allowed Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini to have their violent way with Czechoslovakia.

This time, the intended victim is Israel. As with the effort to appease the Nazis and Fascists nearly 70 years ago, however, the damage will not be confined to the rapee. The interests of the Free World in general and the United States in particular will suffer from what the Saudis and most of the other attendees have in mind for the Jewish State — namely, its dismemberment and ultimate destruction.

Steven Taylor, hardly a liberal, responded, “That has got to be one of the most rhetorically charged paragraphs I have read in a while, and I live in the Blogosphere! We have not only rape, but gang-rape and not just Hitler, be Mussolini throw in as well! What, Generalissimo Francisco Franco was busy when Gaffeny was writing the paragraph? Heck, why not throw in Stalin, too, and add totalitarian communism into the mix. It’s easy if you try!”

Don’t tempt him, Dr. Taylor.

Farley added:

Frank Gaffney has utterly destroyed Godwin’s Law. Future generations will have to use “Gaffney’s Law”, in which Hitler, Mussolini, the gang rape of United States Navy Academy cadets, and the destruction of Israel will all have to be mentioned in order to achieve the level of “inflammatory rhetoric”.

I do hope that at least someone will note that the unruliest of the unruly in the Netroots have only rarely accused Condoleezza Rice of gang rape…

Quite right. Reading Gaffney’s unhinged column, I kept thinking of Karl Rove’s recent admonishment of liberal blogs. The man the president affectionately calls “Turd Blossom” lamented the “angry and vitriolic people” who now have “a voice in public discourse” thanks to the Internet. He added that “angry kooks” argue from “anger,” and undermine democracy by wallowing in “the dark side of the web.”

If the netroots community is dangerous, how might one describe Frank Gaffney and the Washington Times?

The Bush war-mongers are hosting a “Mideast peace conference” in Annapolis (the home of the Naval Academy, part of our war-making machine)? The Bush gangster regime has illegally invaded and occupied Afghanistan and Iraq. Bush has murdered over one million Iraqis in his vile blood-lust. Bush has forced millions of Iraqis to flee and leave Iraq. Bush had given the zionist imperialist Israelis one million cluster bombs which they in turn dropped on the Lebanese people… Bush has tried to destroy Hamas, the democratically elected representatives of the Palestinian people Peace is the absence of war. Peace is also the absence of war-mongering. So Bush and Cheney should stop their war-mongering and saber-rattling against the Iranian people. And now this war-criminal has the gall to organize a “peace” conference? Grotesque…

This is akin to Hitler and the German Nazis trying to stage a “Scandinavian Peace Conference” in Hamburg in 1941 after they invaded and occupied Denmark and Norway…

  • If the netroots community is dangerous, how might one describe Frank Gaffney and the Washington Times?

    A piece written by a guy who loves high-tech weapons and military lore and who is really perturbed that military force might not be used to subdue the Palestinians once and for all?

  • Trying to be so cute. What the hell did he hope to accomplish by publishing that kind of crap….”Hey guys look, I’ve got a hook here…yeah…rape . That’s the ticket.”

  • ***how might one describe Frank Gaffney and the Washington Times?***

    Ummm…how does “a heinous, dastardly act of war” sound to you folks?

  • When liberals do it, it’s bad. When conservatives do it, it’s just good politics. Like spreading rumors that a presidential candidate has an illegitimate black child. Right, Turd Blossom?

    I thought Bush and Rice were Gaffney’s kind of people. Imagine what he would be saying if Democrats were hosting this meeting….

    Well, I can’t imagine. Does it get any worse than this?

  • As unhinged as this is, I love to see the fRight turn on itself. All it does is make life that much more uncomfortable for the Chimperor.

    however, the damage will not be confined to the rapee.

    “Rapee”?

  • Since Gaffney’s ability to distinguish between reality and his rich imagination has disappeared, I look forward to his explanation of how the Treaty of Algeron led directly to the Khitomer Massacre. Why Bush and Condoleeza Rice are willing to allow those stinking Romulans, who are utterly without honor, to dismember the Klingon Empire is beyond me. I’m sure Frank can explain it.

  • Someone PLEASE TELL ME why Israel is more important to some people in our country than OUR OWN COUNTRY?!?!?!

    I mean, Besides oil, our blind support of Israel is the leading cause of hatred towards us in the middle east.

    What do they have on us? Why do our politicians do more for Israel than they do for our country?

    I know a lot of it has to do with the right wing nut jobs’ wet dreams of Armageddon, but this has been going on for a long time, way before the “left behinders” hijacked our political system.

  • Q: Why do our politicians do more for Israel than they do for our country?

    A: Because they are afraid.

    The American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), now embroiled in a spy case [.pdf], has been rated the second heaviest hitter in the world of Washington lobbyists, just behind the AARP, but ahead of the NRA and the AFL-CIO. Adding heft to their efforts is the Christian evangelical factor: the theology of many born-again Christians is linked to unconditional support for Israel, because the ingathering of Jews in the Holy Land is seen as a signal that the End Times are upon us – and God, in the evangelicals’ view, is definitely on the side of Tel Aviv.

    http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8730

  • So Condi has gone from being potential presidential material for the right to being a rapist or, God forbid, Neville Chamberlain. Extending Gaffney’s analogy I guess peace is essentially a date rape drug. I thought the right only engaged this extreme hyperbole with speaking of Democrats. … Reap what you’ve sown Repubs.

  • Oh dear … methinks someone forgot to take his meds this morning.

    I realize that wingnuts are convinced that “Blow ‘Em All Up” is a sound foreign policy doctrine, but this screed shows an unnatural—and, quite frankly, frightening—hatred toward the very thought of peaceful resolutions to difficult problems.

    Sadly, if such thoughts were confined to kooks like Gaffney writing in fourth-tier fishwraps like the Washington Times, that’d be one thing. But this guy pretty much summed up Bush’s foreign policy these past seven years.

  • “when the British and French allowed Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini to have their violent way with Czechoslovakia.”

    Which part of Czechoslovakia did Italy get?

    “What, Generalissimo Francisco Franco was busy when Gaffeny was writing the paragraph?”

    Well, he is still dead, you know.

  • So, uh… Talking about not shooting people anymore is equivalent to the eradication of the Israeli state?

    Is that, like, a step further from saying not shooting people is anti-Semitism?

    I don’t even understand what the guy is talking about…

  • Gaffney’s column is brilliant, if anything too restrained. He should have elaborated on what utter disasters Bush’s choices for Secretary of State have been. One can’t possibly imagine better arguments against the pernicious and corrosive unAmerican practice of reverse discrimination euphemistically styled as “affirmative action”.

  • I think it’s all a calculated ploy to move up the ladder toward respectability.

    Remember when Ana Marie Cox was Wonkette and her constant posts about “butt sex” gave off the vague impression that she loved to take it up the ass multiple times daily? That may or may not have been true, but look at her now!

    Plus, the reason nobody ever accuses Condi Rice of gang rape is that being a member of a gang requires being in the loop. Maybe she’d love to be out gang raping, but Cheney will never tell her who or when.

  • Comments are closed.