Between the presidential campaign and yesterday’s votes on telecom immunity and surveillance powers, it’s hard for other issues to gain traction, but there’s an interesting measure poised for a Senate vote today that’s worth considering.
A spending bill to finance the nation’s intelligence efforts went to conference after the House and Senate versions were slightly different, and while there, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) added an important provision — mandating one interrogation standard for the entire U.S. government. The Feinstein measure requires the intelligence community to abide by the same interrogation standards articulated in the Army Field Manual, which, of course, prohibit torture.
Under Senate rules in place for this debate, Dems will need 60 votes to pass the bill, and a handful of Republicans, including Hagel and Snowe, have said they’ll vote with the majority, despite the White House’s opposition to applying Army Field Manual standards to the intelligence community.
So, what’s John McCain going to do? Here’s what he said a couple of months ago:
Or, in text form: “I would hope that we would understand, my friends, that life is not 24 and Jack Bauer. Life is interrogation techniques which are humane and yet effective. And I just came back from visiting a prison in Iraq. The army general there said that techniques under the Army Field Manual are working and working effectively, and he didn’t think they need to do anything else. My friends, this is what America is all about.”
If this is what “America is all about,” will McCain break party ranks and vote for his values?
If McCain votes in support of the Army Field Manual standards, he runs the risk of angering the pro-torture Republican base.
If McCain votes against the Army Field Manual standards, he’ll have flip-flopped, cravenly, on what he claims to be a personal principle.
If McCain fails to show up for work (again) because voting one way or the other is filled with political peril, he’ll look spineless (again), just as he did last week on the stimulus bill.
Here’s Harry Reid on the subject yesterday:
“When the Intelligence Authorization conference report comes to the floor tomorrow, Republicans should join us to support one standard of interrogation – as outlined in the Army Field Manual – for the entire government.
“We want to abide by the manual because it works. Gen. Petraeus has said it works effectively. Thirty-six retired Admirals and Generals have said it is effective on high-level detainees. And a bipartisan group of foreign policy experts – including the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission and Republicans who served as National Security Adviser, Secretary of State and Secretary of the Navy – have asked Congress to endorse the same standards in the Army Field Manual.
“Agreeing on one standard of interrogation will help restore our moral leadership in the world, and it is incredible that some Republicans may vote against that. In the long run, torture does not help the United States; in fact, it can be counterproductive as the information obtained is not reliable, it puts our own troops at greater risk and it undermines our counterinsurgency efforts.”
ThinkProgress, Kagro, and Aravosis are also all over this.
We’ll see what happens.
Update: It looks like McCain’s GOP colleagues decided to make this a lot easier on him:
This is what the administration’s recent pro-waterboarding PR offensive had been leading up to. But the Republican side backed down.
Later this afternoon, the Senate will be voting on a bill authorizing the government’s intelligence activities. Included in that bill is a measure sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) that would restrict the interrogation methods the CIA could use to the Army Field Manual, which bans waterboarding and other harsh techniques currently used by the CIA. The Republicans had been expected to challenge that provision, forcing a vote. But they didn’t. After a vote on the bill in 90 minutes or so, it will be on its way to the President, who has already announced that he will veto it.