Another ‘dark moment in the Bush era’? We should be so lucky

Newsweek’s [tag]Howard Fineman[/tag] argued that [tag]Ken Lay[/tag]’s conviction “marks another dark moment in the Bush era.” Oh, how I wish that were true.

If you want a date to mark the beginning of the end of the [tag]Bush[/tag] era in American life, you may as well make it this one: May 25, 2006. The Enron jury in Houston didn’t just put the wood to Ken Lay and [tag]Jeff Skilling[/tag]. The jurors took a chainsaw to the moral claims of the Texas-based corporate culture that had helped fuel the rise to power of President George W. Bush. […]

As Texas governor from 1995 to 2000, Bush and consiglieri [tag]Karl Rove[/tag] cultivated the Enronites for their vast connections and money; more than that, Bush linked arms with Lay in the belief that market forces alone should guide the production, distribution and use of energy. But the theory ran riot at Enron, giving license to corporate buccaneers who blithely screwed consumers, employees and shareholders alike. The old saying applies to Enron: you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.

The Lay-Bush connections are overwhelming, and have been for years. It went beyond the president just giving the crook a nickname (“Kenny Boy”) — Lay was Bush’s biggest donor for his two gubernatorial campaigns; [tag]Enron[/tag] was Bush’s biggest corporate [tag]donor[/tag] in 2000; Lay made Enron’s jet available to Bush during the campaign; and Enron employees joked about Bush considering Lay to be Energy Secretary. (Indeed, the same Enron employees who were screwing over “Grandma Millie” blasted Dems like Clinton, who wanted to crack down on companies like Enron, as “socialists.”)

Even more importantly, those connections deepened after Bush took office, with Dick [tag]Cheney[/tag] meeting secretly with Enron officials to help shape the administration’s [tag]energy[/tag] policy.

But were yesterday’s convictions really the “beginning of the end of the Bush era in American life”? I wish they were, but I’m afraid I don’t see it.

As Ben Adler explained:

If Enron was going to bring down the Bush presidency, it would have done so a long time ago. It was a much bigger news story a few years ago when it broke. And remember, back then Enron was Bush’s largest donor throughout his political career. He still won re-election, and Enron barely even figured into the 2004 campaign.

The Enron debacle was one for the ages, and Bush’s connections to his friends who were crooks is further proof of the president’s poor judgment and “flexible” values, but the convictions were just a confirmation of a warped system gone horribly awry.

Fineman argues yesterday was the “beginning of the end of the Bush era in American life,” but given what we know, that moment should have come a long time ago.

So what have we learned from Enron? The business world and regulators are patting themselves on the back and telling us it’s ok to invest in stocks again because the bad guys have been punished. But Refco, Fannie Mae, and the backdating of options tell us that the bugs are still in the system. A few years of Sarbanes-0xley is not going to save us from another Enron. Read more at:
http://www.soxfirst.com/50226711/what_have_we_learned_from_enron.php

  • An effect on the Bush presidency? If anything, it will be the other way around, and Bush will Pardon lay when he leaves office.

  • Ken Lay Was Highly Influential on Bush Energy Policy & Essentiall Picked Appointments

    When W. was governor, Lay was his biggest financial supporter. And Bush, at Lay’s request, talked up the company–pitching it to both an ambassador from Uzbekistan and to Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge. Lay attended Bush’s economic summit in Texas last January, and dined with Bush and other executives at the White House last February. He was reportedly considered for energy secretary and advised Bush’s transition team on energy policy. Lay even gave Bush’s personnel adviser a list of individuals he endorsed to serve on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which oversees aspects of Enron’s business, and Cheney’s task force embraced several key Enron priorities. Several paragraphs of the task force report promoting the unregulated energy derivatives that were the core of Enron’s business read like promotional literature from Lay.

    http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020121&s=lizza012102

    Additionally, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) posts a letter from Ken Lay to the Bush transition team on her Web site in which Ken Lay recommends some people for appointment to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which governs his own industry. There were two appointments to be made, and Lay’s top two recommendations got those appointments. When a third slot later opened up, it went to Joe Kelliher, whom Ken Lay cited as an ally in yet another memo posted by Cantwell.

    http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/blog/page.cfm?pageid=796

  • There is no way that these convictions are going to affect the Bush administration. First of all too much time has past since the beginning of the Enron scandal to now. Americans have short memories. This story will disappear out of the public eye in a few days a week at most and Bush will not suffer from it at all.

    People are too busy thinking about borders, illegal aliens, Iran, and next years American Idol.

    Just say thank you to the diety or non diety of your choice that they did get convicted. I only wish they could get all the people who lost their life savings back.

  • “…and Bush’s connections to his friends who were crooks is further proof of the president’s poor judgment and “flexible” values…”

    “Flexible” and “poor judgement” are way too kind.

    In fact, I’d like to suggest a web project for someone with both talent and balls:

    Collect every jpeg you can that shows Bush posing happily with a convict, future convict, or proven perp.

    Make a web mural of all those pictures.

    What you will have is a plethora of damning evidence that B cultivates criminal relationships.

    Question:

    When you have a vast network of friends that are criminals what does that say about you?

    Answer:

    Now you know one of the reasons why some of us refer to Bush as a “war criminal” and to his nexus as the “Bush crime family.”

  • Mainstream media will never highlight corrupt corporate connections with Washington because they are also in bed with power. When corruption is so vast, it becomes unreportable.

  • Seems like there was a window of opportunity to push the connection between Bush and Enron that closed a long time ago. The dems tried to push the issue and tried to get the energy policy records – but failed on both counts. Can’t we learn from the GOP on this point? I mean, if they can make a big deal out of Travelgate and make it stick, why can’t we successfully make a big deal out of W’s friendship with felons? Why are we so bad at it?

  • He never should have been elected president.

    The good news is you got your wish. The bad news, however…

  • “He never should have been elected president.” – Swan

    “The good news is you got your wish. The bad news, however… ” – dander

    That brought a smile to an otherwise bleak day.

    Thanks

  • But Ken Lay played a round of golf with Bill Clinton.

    Therefore, Enron’s collapse is Clinton’s fault

  • “Therefore, Enron’s collapse is Clinton’s fault” – 2Manchu

    I thought you knew that EVERYTHING was Clinton’s fault, starting with the Tech Bubble bursting and going on to 9/11. So clearly, the deficit is Clinton’s fault because his taxes were producing (fake) surpluses, so Boy George II HAD to campaign on tax cuts, than Clinton’s hidden surprises hit and caused a recession, which has caused America to go into annual deficits for as far as the eye can see.

    [The surpluses were fake because we had an operating funds deficit and a FICA tax surplus that is supposed to be used to build trust funds.]

  • Lance,
    Don’t forget gutting the military, that’s why they fought like shit in Afghanistan against the Taliban in 2001-02.

  • Reading the paper over lunch, I was seeing the reaction here in Omaha to the verdict. Back in the 80s, Omaha-based InterNorth had bought out Houston Gas, and Kenny Boy was named the CEO of the newly-named Enron Corp. In typical Lay fashion, he assured the city of Omaha that he wouldn’t move the company out of town, and even sought the purchase of some downtown condo property.
    Then in 1986, ol’ Ken decides Houston’s business-friendly atmosphere would better suit his emprie-building scheme, so he decided to hell with Omaha, taking with him quite a number of good-paying jobs. The economic sting still lingers here today.

    That being said, the feelings of the former Enron employees that the Omaha World Herald interviewed yesterday all were of the same strand:
    “Serves them right”

  • I’m getting tired of these crooks crying “socialism!” at every attempt at imposing ethical boundaries on them.

    If Enron is what unfettered “free market” capitalism looks like, then fucking give me socialism, and hurry.

  • Comments are closed.