Another week in Bushville

Borrowing the headline from TNR’s Franklin Foer, I think it’s helpful to take a moment, particularly on Fridays, to take stock of the week that was and consider what we’ve learned about the president over the last seven days.

To be sure, the elections in Iraq were the week’s most significant event, and in this respect, the president has to be pleased by the results. Turnout was high, violence was less than the norm, and Sunni participation far exceeded the last Iraqi elections. Everyone, everywhere, has reason to cheer the democratic participation.

But closer to home, it was another illustrative week for the Bush White House. Consider some of the things we learned.

* The administration will resist any and all efforts to combat global climate change, even if it means embarrassing itself on the world stage and acting like children.

* Bush continues to love the benefits of propaganda, particularly overseas, where his administration’s efforts are “extensive, costly, and often hidden.”

* The White House never took pre-war warning very seriously. The French told us that the idea that Saddam Hussein wanted uranium for a nuclear program “didn’t make any sense” because there was no evidence anywhere to support the idea. The Bush gang pursued the tack anyway.

* The Bush Justice Department takes civil rights so seriously, it will no longer allow attorneys in the Civil Rights Division to make recommendations in voting-rights cases.

* The president’s Defense Department seems to have no qualms about spying on law-abiding, anti-war protestors.

* The president personally seems to have no qualms about spying on American citizens, on American soil, without a warrant.

* The principal White House talking point against Senate Dems over Iraq is completely wrong.

* Bush is not exactly striking fear into the hearts of lawmakers at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. Members of Congress ignored the president’s demands and voted against his position on the Patriot Act, overseas detention, and torture.

* The president still believes we were welcomed in Iraq as liberators, but it was “not a peaceful welcome.”

* His administration is really bad at diplomacy, particularly when it comes to Canada.

* Bush is willing to talk about Medicare, but only for pre-screened sycophants at gated community, not his own White House Conference on Aging.

Just another typical week in Bush’s America, right?

I like these weekly wrapups. Depressing but helpful. It’s like having talking points for the weekend.

  • Geez, you left out a bunch:
    -Pre-judging DeLay’s innocence
    -Novak saying the Prez knows who leaked in Plamegate
    -Abramoff scandal widens

  • Damn, VOR, “Abramoff Scandal Widens” could be expanded into it’s own talking points post, there’s so much there

  • The ancients used to sacrifice their leaders when they screwed up. Where’s a Druid when you need one?

  • I like the recap, if only for historical purposes.

    “Bush continues to love the benefits of propaganda, particularly overseas, where his administration’s efforts are “extensive, costly, and often hidden.”” I really worry about this one, especially in this day in age with global communications, as what is “propogandized” abroad no doubt comes back home and I wonder if they may ever, if not already, pushed crap abroad solely to get it to boomerang back to the American public.

  • And Bush will top it all off with yet another “very important” address to the nation about Iraq – alienating the Desparate Housewives constituency.

  • Actually, as Juan Cole notes, the large Sunni turnout is hardly an unmixed blessing, since basically they were voting against the US and the US-backed government. And the Shia still lean towards an Iran-friendly theocracy. Musn’t confuse elections with democracy.

  • An interesting sidenote in this overview of Bushwa comes from the 12/12/05 issue of The New Yorker in an article chronicling the spread of feral hogs in the U.S by Ian Frazier.

    “I compiled ’04 red state-blue state data and matched it with SCWDS, (Southwestern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study), hog-population information on the map of that year. I found my first impression to be correct. The presence of feral hogs in a state is a strong indicator of it’s support for Bush in ’04. Twenty-three of the twenty-eight states with feral hogs voted for Bush. That’s more than four-fifths; states that went for Kerry, by contrast, were feral-hog states less than a fifth of the time.”

    RepubCo needs to change it’s mascot. The feral hog is a far more appropriate symbol with which to promote their ideals of self interest and heedless destruction.

  • Comments are closed.