Anything but ‘successful’

Speaking of classic opening sentences, William Kristol takes the unusual step in a Washington Post piece of anticipating mockery: “I suppose I’ll merely expose myself to harmless ridicule if I make the following assertion: George W. Bush’s presidency will probably be a successful one.”

Kristol’s argument is surprisingly weak, but he got one point exactly right: he exposed himself to ridicule. Here’s his pitch:

Let’s step back from the unnecessary mistakes and the self-inflicted wounds that have characterized the Bush administration. Let’s look at the broad forest rather than the often unlovely trees. What do we see? First, no second terrorist attack on U.S. soil — not something we could have taken for granted. Second, a strong economy — also something that wasn’t inevitable.

And third, and most important, a war in Iraq that has been very difficult, but where — despite some confusion engendered by an almost meaningless “benchmark” report last week — we now seem to be on course to a successful outcome.

It’s probably not necessary to highlight Kristol’s errors in too much detail, but let’s take a moment to point out some of the more glaring problems with the basic pitch.

First, Kristol credits Bush with preventing a post-9/11 terrorist attack. That’s false — about a month after 9/11, someone sent weaponized anthrax to two Democratic senators and several news outlets. Five Americans were killed and 17 more suffered serious illnesses. If the administration has made any headway in bringing the terrorists to justice, it’s been awfully quiet about it.

For that matter, while the U.S. has thankfully not suffered any major terrorist attacks since 2001, Kristol neglects to mention that terrorist attacks around the world have gone up every year since.

Second, Kristol touts a “strong economy.” His timing could have been better — Kristol’s boasts ran on the same day the New York Times highlighted the modern-day “Gilded Age,” in which the United States has the most dramatic concentration of wealth at the top since the 1920s. All the while, poverty has increased, Bush has run the largest budget deficits in American history, and economic growth has been sluggish, at best.

And third, Kristol, of course, believes we’re “on course to a successful outcome” in Iraq. The evidence to the contrary is overwhelming.

If the handful of Americans who still approve of the president’s job performance hope to persuade others to their way of thinking, they’ll have to do better than this.

Bush successfully destroyed the U.S. Constitution, governmental transparency, the United States’ standing in the world, Iraq, America’s rule of law, America’s military, the middle class … . Yep, that’s pretty successful!

  • Just reading that excerpt (I can’t bring myself to read the actual article) Kristol’s delusion shines so brightly as to be blinding. Every sentence covers such an array of idiocy and up-is-downism as to be nearly unbelievable, except coming from Kristol it is all too predictable. This guy makes scientologists and mormons seem absolutely sane.

  • I’m not sure what the record is for pages of read comments to a WP article, but Wild Bill has a pretty good chance at setting the record. The general consensus is he’s ready for the rubber room.

  • A hate-inspiring easy invasion which became a pointless, bloody quagmire bankrupting future generations through massive borrowing… maybe that spells “success” for Kristol’s neocons and the rest of the Bush Crime Family, but to everyone but the Congressional Democrats it spells “impeachable offense”..

  • The year 2003 also featured a close congressional vote on Bush’s other major first-term initiative, the Medicare prescription drug benefit. Liberals denounced it as doing nothing for the elderly; conservatives worried that it would bust the budget. Experts of all stripes foresaw great challenges in its implementation. In fact, it has all gone surprisingly smoothly, providing broad and welcome coverage for seniors and coming in under projected costs.

    Is this really true, or something more in character for Kristol, an outright lie? I’d be interested in whether the “projected costs” are tied to Bush’s original $400 billion claim or the more realistic higher values.

  • Note that Kristol implicitly gives Bush a complete pass on 9/11.

    On the other hand, Kristol has been perfectly willing to hang the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center on Clinton, as well as counting up 29 Americans killed by terrorist attacks worldwide under Clinton (see http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/312rpsfo.asp?pg=1 ), and he has also been willing to blame Clinton for 9/11 itself (see http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/18/kristol-blames-clinton/ ).

    Classic IOKIYAR / BIAOND (blame it all on the nearest Democrat).

    In fact we should probably go back and re-evaluate Condoleeza’s line (all too widely accepted among the punditocracy) that it wasn’t Bush’s fault because no one could have anticipated anything or done anything in the run-up to 9/11. We have known for a long time that before 9/11 Bush was denigrating the possibility of terrorism and was belittling warnings and concerns, but I think we have only learned relatively recently the degree to which the Bush machine has continually and deliberately attempted to put incompetent people in charge and to which it has punished minions who don’t support the Bush line at every opportunity. There may be more to the standard story.

  • Let’s look at the Bush presidency. Civil Liberties have been curtailed. Our first and most important goal to kill or capture the folks that planned and trained the terrorists that caused 9/11 are still on the loose. Osama and remember the leader of the Taliban, Mullah Omar are still chillin’ somewhere. None of the major problems that effect everyday working Americans have been addressed – stagnant wages (just passed minimum wage hike), energy costs are out of control, the environment is dying, healthcare costs continue to raise with the average Joe finding it harder and harder to afford health insurance, we make nothing any more in this country. We don’t even make shoes. Everything is getting shipped overseas. The big 3 have laid off a major city worth of employees during Bush’s tenure but they aren’t financially stable yet. Big profits for companies. Huge salaries for CEO’s. Nothing for the average Joe.

    Yep, George has been great alright.

  • I’d love to see the question polled: what percentage of the public is aware that Bush’s response to the August 2001 CIA briefing and the PDB “Bin Laden Determined to Attack in U.S.” was to say to the briefer, “Okay, now you’ve covered your ass”?

    And as always, it must be pointed out that it’s unlikely to the point of unthinkable that, had President Gore blown off the same warning, he would have gotten a lifelong free pass from it.

  • Kristol’s argument is wholly pointless, however, because he has to start it with this:

    Let’s step back from the unnecessary mistakes and the self-inflicted wounds that have characterized the Bush administration.

    Which is about like saying that other than her husband being assassinated, Ms. Lincoln’s night at the theater was charming.

    The unnecessary mistakes and wounds, and the fact that they have been so frequent and significant so as to “characterize” the administration, are the whole point. You can’t just set that aside or overlook it.

    And talk about your low bars: even if Kristol were right that Bush had two major successes in terms of domestic legislation in his first full term, is that really something to brag about? Two? In four years? Prior to the Dems taking Congress?

    No, to anyone short of the zombies of the Night of the Living Dead, reading between the lines of Kristol’s piece actually shows just how bad BushCo is. Worst. Administration. Ever.

  • Kristol is so far beneath contempt as to give the term ‘bottomless’ new meaning. Like insane and cartoonish Ann Coulter why does anyone pay Kristol any mind anymore? He’s been wrong, wrong, wrong at every turn, but the corporate media and the rightwing American Enterprise Institute still give him lots of play. The man is a buffoon. I have to take a shower every time I see his moon face spouting lies on TV.

  • As noted any economy that is amassing such a huge debt really is not working right. To say that the war is on course to successful outcome is likely the most blind and thoughtless comment on the situation. How many more Americans must die in Iraq for this great outcome. How is Kristol measuring the war’s success.

  • But…., Bush, Delay, and Frisk may have planted the roots for a decade or more of rule by progressives!

    Making Republicans almost unelectable is very much in the best interest of the nation, and these people have contributed a great deal towards that cause.

    Goldwater to Bush, the conservative revolution RIP.

    Now, the Democrats need to step up and seize the massive opportunity that the demonstrated failure of conservative philosophy has presented.

    Go Bush! Destroy those damn Republicans!

  • The fact that freaking morons like Bill Kristol are still on TV is proof positive that the castle that needs to be stormed at the earliest possible moment is the “mainstream media”. Michael Moore, if you’re out there, please do a documentary on our media.

    Please!

    Bill Kristol’s smirking mug has polluted the airwaves for too long. Has there ever been a person who has been more wrong more often, and always dangerously so? The guy is literally a walking “How to destroy America” book. The douchebag is crying for war with Iran, and we’re about to run out of troops. I guess he’s saying we need to nuke them all. The man is despicable, and yet there he is on TV. Someone upstairs thinks Kristol is right. And that someone needs to be shown the blunt end of some serious re-regulation.

    Hey media: When we come with the pitchforks and torches, when we take you down and bury your greedy corporations in the pages of history, when we reclaim our national discourse from your destructive grasp, we will have a picture of Bill “always wrong” Kristol, and we will staple it to the tombstone of your company with a large nail gun.

  • The mistakes ARE the Bush presidency – this thing where people like Kristol try to rhetorically skip over them is laughable, and the comparison to “other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?” is dead on.

    Racer – I’m at the point where there would be more satisfaction in attaching Kristol’s picture to the foreheads of those enabling corporate CEOs with the nail gun…

  • Let’s look at the broad forest rather than the often unlovely trees. What do we see? — Kristol Ball

    With rose-tinted glasses or without? What I see is a diseased forest. The trees aren’t “often unlovely”; they’re uniformly twisted and stunted and useless. No matter how far back I step, as long as I can see the forest at all, this is what I see. But I wear normal glasses, not Kristol-lensed ones…

  • Kristol is just verbally yoinking off. He must hate God- as any good, Southern, Baptist will tell you, every time a good man lies or bends the truth for Satan, an angel loses his wings and falls screaming to hell. Why would Kristol be doing this?

    Ok, of course I’m just playing. But, just sayin’…

  • Kristol doesn’t really have to worry about opening himself to ridicule, we’ve considered him ridiculous for a long time.

  • I for one would like to start a Draft Bill Kristol movement. As in draft him as a special human IED detector. Why insult the various types of infantrymen and women by lumping this piece of shit with them?

  • Comments are closed.