The WaPo ran a startling front-page piece today on internal White House discussions about Karl Rove’s future. Apparently, there’s a growing sentiment that it might be time for Rove to explore other opportunities.
Top White House aides are privately discussing the future of Karl Rove, with some expressing doubt that President Bush can move beyond the damaging CIA leak case as long as his closest political strategist remains in the administration.
If Rove stays, which colleagues say remains his intention, he may at a minimum have to issue a formal apology for misleading colleagues and the public about his role in conversations that led to the unmasking of CIA operative Valerie Plame, according to senior Republican sources familiar with White House deliberations.
While it’s amazing at face value that Rove’s White House colleagues are strategizing over his ouster, it’s equally amazing that they’re calling up the Washington Post to talk about it. Two weeks ago, we saw WH aides blabbing to the LA Times that Scooter Libby was a vengeful attack dog on an anti-Wilson crusade. Today, it seems the long knives are out for Rove, with several WH insiders explaining that Rove’s continued presence is awful for morale, in part because he lied to everyone, including Press Secretary Scott McClellan, about his role in the leaks.
And as if the flailing support of his colleagues weren’t enough, Rove is still very much in legal jeopardy.
While Rove faces doubts about his White House status, there are new indications that he remains in legal jeopardy from Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald’s criminal investigation of the Plame leak. The prosecutor spoke this week with an attorney for Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper about his client’s conversations with Rove before and after Plame’s identity became publicly known because of anonymous disclosures by White House officials, according to two sources familiar with the conversation.
Fitzgerald is considering charging Rove with making false statements in the course of the 22-month probe, and sources close to Rove — who holds the titles of senior adviser and White House deputy chief of staff — said they expect to know within weeks whether the most powerful aide in the White House will be accused of a crime. […] Fitzgerald made it clear to Rove’s attorney in private conversations last week that his client remains under investigation.
The celebration in some conservative circles after last Friday came and went without a Rove indictment was, to put it mildly, premature.
And as far as the politics is concerned, the White House still can’t get around the basic fact that the president pledged to fire anyone involved with the leak. It just makes it easy for Dems to keep hammering away.
“It is totally unacceptable that anyone involved in the unauthorized disclosure of the identity of a CIA officer, including your Deputy Chief of Staff, Karl Rove, should remain employed at the White House with a security clearance,” Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) wrote Bush yesterday.
Republicans can hope these criticisms will go away, but wishing won’t make it so.