As much as I appreciate McCain’s denunciation of Cunningham…

This got quite a bit of attention yesterday, and with good reason. John McCain, to his credit, denounced a right-wing loud-mouth for being a bit of an ass at one of the Republican’s official campaign events in Ohio.

A supporter of John McCain, speaking at an official campaign event in Ohio attended by the Arizona senator, called Barack Obama a “hack, Chicago-style Daly politician,” and told the crowd “all is going to be right with the world when the great prophet from Chicago takes the stand, and the world leaders who want to kill us will simply be singing Kumbaya around the table of Barack Obama.”

“At some point in the near future the media, the stooges from the New York Times, CBS (The Clinton Broadcasting System), NBC (The Nobody But Clinton Network), The All Bill Clinton Channel (ABC), and the Clinton News Network at some point is going to peel the bark off Barack Hussein Obama,” said controversial conservative commentator Bill Cunningham, an Ohio native.

McCain, who was not on stage during Cunningham’s harangue, later told reporters, “I regret any comments that may be made about these two individuals who are honorable Americans, we just have strong philosophical differences, so I want to disassociate myself from any disparaging remarks that may have been said about them.” He added that he would take responsibility to ensure that similar comments are not repeated at future McCain events.

Good for him. Everyone says they want a respectful debate, but few make any effort to ensure one. This was encouraging.

Jonathan Chait, among others, said that McCain “does have a lot of very decent instincts.” I appreciate McCain taking the high road yesterday, but let’s not go too far here.

My sense is, McCain’s instincts actually lead him in the opposite direction.

In 1998, McCain was so fond of “respectful discussion” that he told a nasty, tasteless joke about Chelsea Clinton at a Republican Senate fundraiser, describing the president’s daughter as “ugly,” and suggesting that Janet Reno is a man.

Earlier this year, during a back-room discussion on immigration reform, Mr. Respectful Debate started shouting at Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who dared to disagree with him. McCain accused Cornyn of raising petty objections, and Cornyn accused McCain of having dropped in without taking part in the negotiations. “F**k you! I know more about this than anyone else in the room,” McCain shouted. The WaPo added that McCain also “used a curse word associated with chickens.”

In 1999, Jake Tapper reported on an incident in which McCain got into a shouting match with Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).

Grassley got in McCain’s face, and the two pit bulls started barking at each other while the other senators in the room sat back and watched. The pair got so close to one another that the senator who tells me the story — aware that because of war injuries, McCain’s arms don’t fully extend — was convinced McCain “was going to drive the top of his head into Grassley’s nose. I was convinced that bone fragments were going to go into Chuck’s brain, and I was sitting there and was about to witness a murder.”

McCain suddenly stood up. But instead of a head-butting homicide, he delivered a crushing blow of words.

“You know, senator,” McCain said, seething, “I thought your problem was that you don’t listen. But that’s not it at all. Your problem is that you’re a f**king jerk.”

These apparently aren’t isolated incidents.

“I have witnessed incidents where he has used profanity at colleagues and exploded at colleagues,” said former Senator Bob Smith, a New Hampshire Republican who served with McCain on the Senate Armed Services Committee and on Republican policy committees. “He would disagree about something and then explode. It was incidents of irrational behavior. We’ve all had incidents where we have gotten angry, but I’ve never seen anyone act like that.”

McCain’s outbursts often erupted when other members rebuffed his requests for support during his bid in 2000 for the Republican nomination for president. A former Senate staffer recalled what happened when McCain asked for support from a fellow Republican senator on the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.

“The senator explained that he had already committed to support George Bush,” the former Senate staffer said. “McCain said ‘f**k you’ and never spoke to him again.”

Don’t get me wrong; I don’t want to sound ungrateful about yesterday. Cunningham was being a jerk at an official campaign event, and McCain did the right thing by distancing himself from the loudmouth’s remarks. He made the right call, without question, and deserves praise for it.

But it’s probably worth remembering that McCain takes classy steps like these in part to help make up for the fact that he’s been a rather abusive hothead for years, who has rejected the notion of “respectful” debate throughout his career.

If yesterday was a sign of a new McCain, I’m delighted. But before we go overboard praising his character, let’s not loose sight of a lengthy career of nastiness.

McCain seems highly erratic to me. He gives displays of both admirable decency and intense bile.

He also alternates between courageous straight-talking (as in Michigan, where he admitted he couldn’t bring their jobs back and they might need re-training) to lies (constant ones, on his positions on Iraq).

I really don’t get him yet. I’m looking forward to the general election.

  • In case anyone hasn’t heard McCain’s “joke”:

    Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?
    Because Janet Reno is her father.

    On the other hand, I’m sure McCain will go ballistic if anyone makes fun of his brain-damaged wife.

    Why would Cindy McCain make a great attorney general?
    Because she really won’t remember.

    Me and Senator McCain. We’re f**king hilarious.

  • Said this in the other debate thread but it’s more appropriate here:

    One thing that this primary campaign has shown is that Obama definitely is cool and unflappable under fire. With McCain’s reputation for being a hothead, the difference in demeanor could make for a very interesting contrast in the general election. Especially if Obama can somehow connect McCain’s shooting from the hip with Bush’s cowboy image.

  • What McCain did, while being the right thing, was shaped not by being respectful but by being politically savvy. When some idiot causes a stink that will be tied to your campaign, you can either repudiate it as McCain did, or have to face questions about a mini controversy for weeks. McCain just nipped his problem in the bud before it took off

  • Oh yeah, he also alternates between sanity (early in the Bush regime, where he opposed things like wild tax breaks for the rich) and hyper neoconservatism.

  • Yesterday my comment about this situation was that it’s not really taking the high road when those on the low road are marching to your orders.

    The whole thing smells like a setup.

  • Cunningham was being a jerk. The constant use of Obama’s middle name is nothing more than a not-so-transparent attempt by certain individuals (Cunningham, Coulter, Savage, Malkin etc.), some of whom I agree with on the issues, to make an idiotic campaign issue. I’ve refused to engage in this since I came out against it here. Kudos to John McCain for making short work of this. There is enough information on Obama’s record and beliefs to debate the real campaign issues. His middle name isn’t one of them.

    If yesterday was a sign of a new McCain, I’m delighted. But before we go overboard praising his character, let’s not loose sight of a lengthy career of nastiness. Let’s also not forget that Obama himself has engaged in dirty Chicago-style political tricks and the disenfranchisement of voters (here and here) to gain political office. Being “nasty” is one thing; being deceitful is a legit campaign issue to show the lack of qualifications for someone being President.

  • Adding 3 + J and getting ‘kidney pie’, I submit the following wild-a** extrapolation as a possible explanation:

    The GOP has conducted polling to see just how racist they can get in campaigning against Obama. The number-crunchers needed some real-time modeling to work from, so they put this nitwit out there to splash some gas around and light a cigarette and told McCain to stay out of the building while Cunningham spewed so he’d have some plausible deniability.

    The preceding is a production of the Tin-foil Hat Society of America-Psychorant Chapter.

  • To me, the McCain/Cunningham dance is the same as W claiming to be a “compassionate conservative” — ie. strictly theatre, to be swallowed by the chumps who will swallow it, ie. conservatives who are uncomfortable with the flame-throwing of some of their compatriots and like to see themselves as “taking the high road” when, in reality, they’ll do anything sleazy to win (but please, don’t put it on the front page).

  • Holy CATS! There really is a Tin-Foil Hat Society.

    My most abject apologies to this valuable segment of our culture if my rampant snobbery has given offense.

  • Well seems like the McCain campaign is following that 15 point strategy offered a few days ago.

    “Have a surrogate go all out against the opposition” Then pretend you weren’t aware of it and completely denounce it.

    Sounds like the play book worked on that point.

  • …Chicago-style political tricks… -SteveIL

    Way to regurgitate a talking point, with blogwhoring, to boot.

    Pray tell, oh metal god of politics, what the hell are Chicago-style political tricks? Do they come with a pickle on a poppy seed bun or are they deep dish?

  • Way to regurgitate a talking point, with blogwhoring, to boot. Just adding a rebuttal to the post’s “talking point”, and using actual, you know, data to back it up. Thank you for noticing. Now you can go read it.

    Pray tell, oh metal god of politics, what the hell are Chicago-style political tricks? Do they come with a pickle on a poppy seed bun or are they deep dish? Deep dish. These dirty tricks are all packed in a lot of “dough”. (I just crack myself up! How do I do it?) 🙂

  • You know, I really didn’t know that mccain’s limited mobility was due to his injuries, I just thought he was old. I definitely made fun of him for it before, and now I feel bad in hindsight. (Not sure why making fun of someone for being old is better, maybe because we all get old in the end.)

    But given his pattern of behavior, (including the “how do we beat the bitch” incident”) it looks like the press love affair with mccain continues, the weak NYT article nonwithstanding.

  • Did Hillary request that McCain both reject and denounce the comments? Or did she ignore McCain’s surrogate’s hateful statements because they benefit her own campaign?

  • What is bothering me about McCain’s coverage in the press is after he denounced Cunningham’s comments he was called “courageous” in many of the press reports afterwards. The courageous thing to do was denounce it up on the stage in front of his audience instead of to the press after he left the stage. It also would be instructive to see a search cloud done on adjectives used to describe McCain in the news. In my opinion, Cunningham’s comment about the press needing to “strip the bark off Obama” was the most reprehensible he made.

  • He has had a very easy coast in this primary – peasantly surprised, and surprisingly, the GOP pick. BUT, in the general, when the cooker meets the pressure, he’ll be venting steam now and then, and his colors may come clearer. I think he intends to take the high road with Obama, should they be the nominees, because the Clinton tacktics clearly do not work and this is becoming self-evident. He’ll try to take the high road… but it’ll be tense.

  • Typical!

    The Senator does the right thing and the leftosphere dwellers use the opportunity to attack him.

    Those of us who still hope to build coalitions across party lines wish the idiot fringe made up of old hippies, communists and socialists would just shut-up and go back to their bongs.

  • Ok CB, we get it.. McCain gets angry and has used profanity when addressing a few members of his own party in fits of frustration (“GASP!”) How many times are you going to bring this up????

  • “The Senator does the right thing and the leftosphere dwellers use the opportunity to attack him.”

    With OLD material no less… That’s the CB way, JT…

  • What’s funny is how hard the whole hate-radio community is taking McCain’s momentary descent into sanity. I sense a certain restrained but growing panic among the Rush/Hannity/Savage brigade. Which I can understand, since if Republican candidates stop using hate speech as a weapon then those fat paychecks they’ve been collecting will start drying up. And that, of course, is what means more to them than anything in the whole wide world.

    Of course, give McCain a couple of minutes and he’ll be back on board but it’s still a moment’s uneasiness for them.

  • With OLD material no less… That’s the CB way, JT… -JRS Jr

    McCain’s failure to disavow a supporter for calling Hillary a ‘bitch,’ is hardly old. You can’t establish a pattern with stuff that just happened in the last month, and I don’t think Steve is prescient, so he’s not using any ‘hypothetical’ evidence.

  • J. Tyler Ballance@21

    Would you be the same J. Tyler Ballance that wrote a letter to a Fredericksburg VA paper about why you fly the confederatge flag?

    Or are you the J. Tyler Ballance that wrote a letter to a Richmond weekly in whcih you equated breast feeding as being on par with public masturbation?

    Or are you the J. Tyler Ballance who commented about defeating the babykillers on the left on the Blacknell website?

    Take a fucking hike, jerkoff. We don’t need no stinking coalition with creeps like you.

  • This is going to be a fun election season– the Right goes ape over McCain as the GOP nominee, Rush and others spend weeks mocking him, talking about how they can NEVER support him because he’s not one of them. Then the NYT has a nasty, somewhat questionable piece attacking McCain, the Right suddenly gets on board in his defense. Then a Right winger is asked to introduce McCain at an event, who then says typical wingerish things about Obama, McCain distances himself from the attack.

    So, as always, the Right is pissed and McCain is on their shit list again. I’m sure this will go back and forth for a while, but so far it doesn’t look like he’s going out of his way to appeal to him. The more he dismisses them the pissier they’re going to get…

    Seriously, they are such a bunch of pissy, whiny angry bastards. I think this fact might finally really blow up in their face when up against the positive, optimistic Obama.

  • Re: Palmbeach’s post (26): You have made the mistake of taking whatever Google serves up as being fact; your research is woefully incomplete. The letter originally published in another tabloid that referenced breast feeding actually discussed how an indigent Richmond man was provided with a competent defense by, now Delegate Manouli Loupassi, even though the man had been charged with indecent exposure. It was a letter supporting justice for all and advocating treatment rather than jail for those with mental disorders. Of course, through the combination of severe editing by the original tabloid and intentional misrepresentation by a hack who was out to create something salacious for their next edition, you got the posting with the false indignation by the so-called writer, who apparently never saw the original letter.

    As for honoring Confederate Veterans along with our veterans of other wars, this is not just a good gesture, it is codified in U.S. law, that Confederate Veterans will receive the same honors and courtesies afforded to those who fought in other wars. Members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans are steadily gaining ground on the Jerry Springer version of history, where anyone with a Battle Flag is depicted unfavorably. The SCV advocates a respectful display of the Battle Flag, and a truthful account of the history of the Confederate era. An organization like the SCV that honors all traditions of the American People, should be lauded for its good work toward bringing Americans together.

    The post regarding the unnecessary murder of millions of babies remains valid. We cannot be a society where women are given a superior right to commit murder. Abortion is championed by those on the Left, who are eager to keep the minority population in check. One often hears comments among Democrats like, “If they aren’t born, we won’t have to fund them later…etc.” Abortion is the epitome of racism and is de facto, American genocide directed at the minority population. Women who advocate abortion are the lowest form of bullies. To murder a defenseless, innocent baby is on par with the worst forms of evil throughout history.

    I will be the first to concede that there may be medical reasons for a small number of abortions, but the facts indicate that most of these babies are just murdered by their mothers, out of convenience. I don’t judge people who have made that election to have a what is for now, a legal abortion, but I do advocate for the restoration of human rights for the unborn babies, with the hope that the practice of murdering babies as a form of birth control, our American Holocaust, will finally be brought to an end.

    Even though I may have strong views that are not in concert with a few out their in the pot-hazed fringe, I am adamant that we must always seek common ground on areas of mutual interest. For example, regardless of your political leanings, we all need modern infrastructure; including good highways, clean water and other core infrastructure.

  • Pingback: 7ec754ec6fa7
  • Comments are closed.