At Bush’ Civil Rights Division, African-American lawyers need not apply

The politicization of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division is not entirely new. Far-right attorneys suddenly were given employment priority. Career staffers were pressured out of their jobs. Cases without merit would be pushed by political appointees. All of a sudden, a department that existed to protect the integrity of the 1965 Voting Rights Act and shield African American voters from discrimination, started prosecuting reverse discrimination cases.

As it turns out, it gets worse. As Paul Kiel noted today, a local DC news station crunched some numbers in the Civil Rights Division’s criminal section — the section charged with prosecuting the worst civil rights offenses like hate crimes — and found an interesting trend.

The I-Team has learned that since 2003…the criminal section within the Civil Rights Division has not hired a single black attorney to replace those who have left. Not one.

As a result, the current face of civil rights prosecutions looks like this: Out of fifty attorneys in the Criminal Section – only two are black. The same number the criminal section had in 1978 – even though the size of the staff has more than doubled.

Richard Ugelow was a supervisor at the Civil Rights section that sues government employers for discrimination in hiring and promotion for more than a decade, and was repulsed by the results of the investigation. “We would sue employers for having numbers like that,” Ugelow said.

As for the Civil Rights Division’s voting rights section, we’re learning some disturbing details about its employment practices, too.

McClatchy reported this stunner last night.

Congressional investigators are beginning to focus on accusations that a top civil rights official at the Justice Department illegally hired lawyers based on their political affiliations, especially for sensitive voting rights jobs.

Two former department lawyers told McClatchy Newspapers that Bradley Schlozman, a senior civil rights official, told them in early 2005, after spotting mention of their Republican affiliations on their job applications, to delete those references and resubmit their resumes. Both attorneys were hired.

One of them, Ty Clevenger, said: “He wanted to make it look like it was apolitical.”

Got that? Schlozman wanted to limit employment opportunities at the DoJ’s Civil Rights Division to Republicans, but if he hired a bunch of lawyers with the word “Republican” all over their resumes, it might look funny. So, Schlozman simply told the applicants to remove the GOP reference, so that he could appear to be fair. This, just two weeks after we learned that Schlozman screened job applicants to make sure they were loyal Republicans.

I shudder to think how long it will take for Bush’s successor to turn the Justice Department back into a reasonably functional law enforcement agency again. Let’s hope recovery is even possible, at this point.

Bush is a cancer on America.

  • Yeah, Schlozman – another US Attorney who got his position courtesy of the Patriot Act provision…just a heckuva guy, huh?

    As bad as it is, I have to think it’s going to get much. much worse. And I can hardly bear to think what that means.

  • The problem is that, Democrats play by the rules. How are we supposed to compete, when they hire only on the basis of political affiliation, and we hire only on merit? Having recruited young attorneys for a federal agency, I know that it works like this, and it’s simply not fair.

    That said, we need to be true to our principles, otherwise we’re not fighting for anything other than a name.

  • In defense of the Bush administration. it must be hard finding qualified African-American attorneys with an inate hostility to civil rights enforcement. (end snark)

  • I should think that there will need to be an independent review of all Bush era hires. The corruption is so widespread and so blatant that we can’t wait for attrition to do the job. It’s the only way to reestablish the credibility of the agencies involved.

  • [WH Press Room – Daily Briefing]

    Reporter: Tony, why did the DOJ Civil Rights Division stop hiring African American attorneys? Why did they cover-up the hiring of GOP loyalists?

    Tony: First of all, I don’t like the framing of your question. I was just talking to some of my many Black friends last night and they said it best, Republicans are the party of Lincoln! Lincoln freed the slaves and therefore middle aged white GOP lawyers are definately the best qualified to work at Civil Rights.

    Reporter: Tony, are you on painkillers? Teh White House has no problem with this policy?

    Tony: With the policy, no. The president wishes it were handled differently. First of all, we with you had never found out about it. That would have been best. At the same time, DOJ should not have covered it up. Of course, that would have made it easier to find. You see the catch-22 we are in here.

    Reporter: [head explodes]

  • Great to see this story broken by a local ABC affilliate. Apparently the national DC press corp were too busy cheering for the war to notice anything of such limited news value.

  • Actually, his own explanation is much funnier- he was trying to make it apolitical by ‘hiring people from across the political spectrum’… Say again? And just how would you do that if you were not explicitly aware of their party affiliation?…

  • Comments are closed.