At least she’s not a veterinarian

For an FDA filled with difficulties, the leadership of the agency’s women’s health office has been a particular embarrassment. First, Susan Wood resigned because of the FDA’s ridiculous handling of the review process for Plan B emergency contraception. Then, the administration announced Wood’s replacement at the women’s health office would be Norris Alderson — who is not only a man, but also a specialist in veterinary medicine.

Things became almost comical when the administration pretended that Alderson hadn’t been tapped for the job.

Three days after the Alderson announcement, the FDA main press office sent out a very different announcement. It said that 20-year FDA veteran Theresa A. Toigo would be the new acting director of the women’s health office, and that she would be a champion for women’s health inside and outside the agency. Alderson — and the statement announcing his appointment — was never mentioned. […]

The seeming mystery thickened when several women’s groups said that not only did they receive e-mails announcing Alderson’s appointment, but also that he was also listed on a Health and Human Services directory last week as the acting director of the office. In addition, people who have spoken with women’s health office staff said that Alderson was introduced to the staff last week as the new acting director, and that he even had some one-on-one discussions with staff members about future plans.

Yesterday, the FDA seemed anxious to put the matter to rest, naming Kathleen Uhl, a supervisor for the agency’s drug division and a practicing physician at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, to take over the women’s health office.

Is Uhl a good choice? I have no idea, but at least she isn’t a veterinarian.

Actually, I know a number of veterinarians who would be far better in this post than anyone who’s likely to be put there in today’s climate. Snark aside, they are people who are highly knowledgeable about women’s health issues and public policy, who happen to be vets.

OK, sure, there are probably MDs who are better qualified still, but I think you’re being a little too dismissive of the medical knowledge in the veterinary profession.

  • …but I think you’re being a little too dismissive of the medical knowledge in the veterinary profession.

    Fair enough, short fuse, maybe I was a little overly snarky about vets. That wasn’t my intention.

    The point, of course, is that the White House clearly hasn’t dealt with the FDA’s women’s health office well, and tapping a veterinarian — then pretending they didn’t — wasn’t helpful.

    But having said that, no disrespect was intended to vets. Especially not the one that takes good care of my cat.

  • One of the little known elements of the FDA giving a vet for the Women’s Health job (temporarily, at least) was the official position of the vet in question. It’s my understanding that Alderson was the supervisor over a number of branches, including the Office of Women’s Health. When a middle manager leaves a position, it’s usually their supervisor who handles the account until a suitable replacement can be found. It was no surprise to me that Alderman took over the duties. The fact that his background was in vet medicine is not important. Unfortunately, that’s all that played up in the press. The FDA was not wrong giving Alderman the temporary assignment until it could have been filled by a suitable replacement with a background in women’s health issues.

  • Comments are closed.