Avoiding the inevitable comparison

The federal government’s preparations in advance of Hurricane Rita making landfall are broad and impressive. Yesterday, it seemed like the entire federal apparatus was operating like a finely-tuned machine — emergency supplies were pre-positioned, evacuation orders were issued, FEMA generators and tarps are already in Texas, military troops and supplies have already been strategically placed in key areas for immediate deployment, and communication between agencies and levels of government has been constant. This is how a powerful and efficient government is supposed to prepare for a potentially devastating storm.

And while I couldn’t be more pleased by the preparation, I couldn’t help but find it comical to see the White House’s political spin/defense when the readiness for Rita is compared to the readiness for Katrina.

Yesterday, for example, Scott McClellan was almost bragging when he touted the extraordinary lengths the administration was going to in advance of this hurricane. He couldn’t, however, admit that this effort is stronger or more impressive than preparations in advance of Katrina, because that would be an admission of a tragic mistake.

Instead, McClellan had to dance along a perilous tight rope — the administration, he said, is really great at this hurricane-preparation stuff now, but that doesn’t mean the administration wasn’t equally great before too.

Q: Well, Scott, continuing with what Steve said, how is what you’re doing for Rita different from what you did from Katrina?

McClellan: Sure. A couple of things — one, the President is focused on making sure we have the strongest possible coordination with state and local governments in the path of Hurricane Rita. We hope Rita is not devastating, but we must be prepared for the worst. Coordination at all levels needs to be seamless, or as seamless as possible, and that’s what we’re working to do. […]

Q: So that’s — you think that that’s going to be an improvement over what was done in Katrina?

McClellan: Well, again, in terms of Katrina, we’re still focused on the immediate needs of the people in the region and working to make sure that they are getting back up on their feet, that we’re moving forward on the recovery, that we’re moving forward on the rebuilding to help people rebuild their lives and rebuild their communities. We are determined to learn the lessons of Katrina, and that’s why we have been assessing what’s been working and what hasn’t been working and taking steps to address those issues. That’s why we’re also working closely with Congress, and the President is committed to making sure that there’s a thorough investigation so that we can learn those lessons.

Q: Well, can you distinguish what you’re doing differently?

McClellan: Yes, I just talked to you about where the President’s focus is and what we are doing. We want to make sure that we’re —

Q: And these are things you didn’t do in Katrina?

McClellan: We want to make sure that we are better prepared and better positioned to respond to Hurricane Rita and that’s what we’re doing. That’s why I outlined the several steps that we are taking. And that’s why I just told you that the President is focused on making sure that we have the strongest possible coordination with state and local officials, and that we have —

Q: Which you didn’t have before, right?

McClellan: — as seamless as possible coordination with state and local officials.

Q: In other words, better than the last time?

McClellan: I think I just answered that question, Bill.

Q: No, not really.

The poor guy knew the answer, and knew that we knew the answer, but he just couldn’t go there. He’d have to admit that the administration’s preparations and immediate response to Katrina was abysmal. Because that’s politically impossible, McClellan has to highlight the extraordinary proficiency of the ongoing efforts without comparing them in any way to the ineptitude of the previous efforts.

It must be tough to be Bush’s press secretary, don’t you think?

If he wants my pity, he can get himself an honest job. Nobody’s forcing him to work for this administration.

  • I’d almost respect McClellan if he’d just admit that they’ve learned from their mistakes and will do better this time. But since they can’t admit a mistake, he just evades the obvious.

    Idiot.

  • Those (like Rush) who have been defending the Bush administration by saying that it’s the primary job of the state and local govenments to prepare for these storms have a bit of a problem. How will they explain the federal preparations this time? That the republican govenor of Texas and mayor of Houston did what democratic Blanco and Nagin didn’t, of course. It’s BS, but I’m sure that will be the defense. Still, I’m just glad the Bushies learned their lession and proper preparations are being made this time. Being from LA, however, I just can’t help comparing how the Bush administration responded to the hurricanes in Florida before the election and this one apparently headed for Texas with the one that hit my poor home state.

  • How does McClellan do it day after day? Wouldn’t he just snap after a while? Like CB said, he knew the answer, and he knew that we knew the answer. Well, given that, you’d think he would just blurt out the truth one time! He really is our answer to Baghdad Bob, and we all remember what a joke that guy was.

  • I am glad the prep is going well – I wouldn’t wish the outcome of Katrina even on TX – a state I normally intensly dislike but am currently grateful to.

    I really hope the prep for Rita is a “lesson-learned” from Katrina and not a “because this is Texas”- home to the prez.

    I also think a little less bragging is called for. It is so incredibly unhelpful. There are ways to talk about the prep in terms of “never again” without looking snotty.

  • He kept repeating in almost saying what is different this time is, “the President’s focus” or “the President is focused”, is that a clear admission that the President wasn’t focused last time?

    Maybe it would be a good time to start cancelling the presidential month off of August. August? Isn’t that named for Augustus Caesar?

  • Sorry ET, but do you think it is less snotty (or whatever term you want to use – tasteless) to pretend that there was no mistakes made with Katrina? Do you think it is less snotty for a press secretary to not answer questions? Should we ignore the “politics” of the different response and just be glad the people of Texas are getting a response?

    Sometimes shame is the only thing that keeps people to change their ways. Sometimes people will never be shamed, and the only way to change their ways is to get them the hell out of the government.

  • Yeah, Alex, I noticed the “focus” thing, too. Does that mean the word “Texas” (with which he’s familiar) snapped Georgie out of his afternoon nap (which follows his 2-hour exercise session) long enough to tune in to the Weather Channel or something?

    As for McClelland, he can walk away any time he wants to. Nobody’s holding a gun to his head as he stands at the podium. (And if they are, why in god’s name doesn’t he grab it from them and blow his brains out? That’s what I’d do if I had his job.)

    For these guys to be boasting about how ready they are for Rita is in really bad taste. Unless, as ET pointed out, they’re linking it to an admission that the advance preparation and response to Katrina left A LOT to be desired and revealed gaping holes in our disaster preparedness. But they’ll never do that – they can never admit the Emperor has no clothes. Not even when everyone else in the world knows it.

  • Quick, someone call the Vatican. A miracle has just happened! Now
    we can formally begin to start the canonization of St. George!
    Gee, when it was time to save the lives of a bunch of poor, black,and
    DEMOCRATIC lives in Louisiana everyone was out to lunch ( or off buying shoes). Who cares about them, right?
    But when it comes down to protecting Bush’s own home state, no
    expense is spared. Systems actually WORK. It’s a good thing
    there aren’t any levees around Houston (as far as I know). Really special.
    A little too special if you ask me.
    What are David Vitter and Mary Landrieu going to say about this one?
    And when it comes time to divvy up the clean up money guess which state
    is suddenly going to have all the resources they need? My guess is
    its name won’t start with the letter L.

  • I feel sorry for those poor White House reporters who have to listen to Scotty’s drivel every day. They know they’re being lied to, they know there will never be anything newsworthy said to make the investment of their precious hours worthwhile and their careers are going down the tube because of it. And yet they keep on attending. I guess it’s because it’s their job and they do get paid for it so they can be forgiven but, gee whiz, it’s a tough row to hoe.

  • Comments are closed.