Barney Frank envisions a ‘grand bargain’ with corporate America

It didn’t get much attention at the time, but the day after the election, Rep. [tag]Barney Frank[/tag] (D-Mass.), soon to be the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, gave an interesting speech in Boston to a number of business leaders. “I’m a capitalist, and that means I’m for inequality,” Frank said. “But you reach a point where you get more inequality than is healthy, and I believe we’re at that point.”

Frank has a policy agenda that focuses on higher wages and better benefits for workers. Corporate America has a policy agenda that focuses on fewer (and weaker) business regulations and more trade agreements. Apparently, it may be time for a “grand bargain.”

Representative Barney Frank has proposed in a series of meetings with business groups a “grand bargain” with corporate America: Democrats would agree to reduce regulations and support free-trade deals in exchange for businesses agreeing to greater wage increases and job benefits for workers.

Frank…has struck a conciliatory posture with financial-industry leaders in recent years. But since the morning after Election Day, he has moved quickly to lay out an ambitious plan to try to end the political stalemate between Republicans and Democrats on broad economic issues.

“What I want to do is break that deadlock,” Frank said in an interview. “A lot of policies that the business community wants us to adopt for growth are now blocked. On the other hand, the business community is successfully blocking the minimum wage [increase] and created a very anti union attitude in the Congress.”

I haven’t seen all of the details of the bargain, but it sounds like Frank is on the right track. Under the plan, Corporate America will have to embrace a minimum-wage increase and offer greater protection for workers adversely affected by trade treaties. Frank and congressional Dems will, in turn, looser regulations, more free-trade deals, and new immigration rules favored by businesses.

“What we want to do is to look at public policies that’ll get some bigger share of the increased wealth into wages, and in return you’ll see Democrats as internationalists,” Frank said, adding, “I really urge the business community to join us.”

As it turns out, the business community is open to the conversation — particularly when it comes to health care.

Many businesses are trying to shed high health care premiums. Frank hopes that workers and businesses can agree on a government-administered plan paid for by workers that would reduce burdens on businesses, which would pass on savings to employees through higher wages.

“I think employer-paid health care is a mistake,” he said. “I think it depresses wages.”

Stephen J. Collins , president of the Automotive Trade Policy Council, which represents Detroit’s Big Three automakers, said business leaders would welcome such a discussion with Frank. “Our companies are very open about the fact that they are facing massive competitive challenges of a global nature that need big answers,” Collins said. “There has to be a partnership between government and industry to solve some of these problems, and health [care] is one of them.”

Obviously, details matter here. How much of a minimum-wage increase will businesses accept? What kind of free-trade deals are Dems going to support? How would new health-care subsidies work?

Still, I’m vaguely encouraged by all of this and offer Frank credit for thinking “outside the box.” We’ll see how the bargain unfolds in the coming months, but it appears that there are signs of progress.

I trust Frank to do the right thing, but I would sure like to see some changes made to the PREVIOUS “free trade” treaties, where a lot was promised about labor and environmental laws in places like Mexico, but littel or nothing was actually delivered besides the Giant Sucking Sound.

Free trade is a royal crock of crap if the labor/environmental rules are different for the businesses in the competing countries.

  • But, but, but Frank is gay. And this sounds like something that might help families and marriages. How can that be so?

  • In addition to the healthcare reform, I hope Barney and Democrats are able to tackle retirement reform. The working class citizens need a stronger social security package since companies are getting rid of pension plans. 401(k)’s are great for financially savy accountants like me, but they are terrible for most other people.

  • Frank is proposing Quid pro Quid more or less
    And I absolutely agree with him….if businesses want lossened regs they are going to have to make some consessions to the average working class citizen….the deck has been tilted in their favor for at least 10 years (Clinton was a true centrist when it came to favoring business over the working man) that it is time for the middle class worker to reap some of the rewards of corporate expansion

    God its great to having a functioning governement again…look at what DEMS have proposed to take action on as soon as the Congressional Session starts

    1. Global Warming
    2. Halliburton Fraud/Iraq War reconsturction fraud that defrauds the taxpayer
    3. Robo Call legislation
    4. Minimum wage increase
    5. 9/11 commision recomendations
    6. Barney Frank “grand bargin”
    7. Healthcare legislation
    8. College Tuition aid

    The common thread is that these are mostly populist issues that really affect American citizens everyday (unlike flag burning and gay marriage amendments)

    These are issues I believe will strike a chord with the American populous and really show the contrast between Democratic Party style governance and Republican/Conservative style “governance”…if successful…DEMS could hold a majority for a long time…

  • I vaguely remember something like this from a long time ago…I think it is called comprimise. It was thought to be extinct along the mid-atlantic seaboard as it has not been seen in over a decade.

    Good for Frank. Good for Dems. People want functioning government and brokering mutually beneficial policy compromises is exactly the kind of thing that will keep Dems in power for a long time.

  • Not until “Free Trade” include real protections for workers and stop the race to the bottom. Selling out to the pinstriped pimps on any other terms means the Democrats have abandoned their base.

  • I’m aware that successfuly currying favor with the business community will provide the means for the Dems to remain powerful after the 2008 elections. However, I’m reticent to sell-off too much to a part of our society that is increasingly detached from obligation to anything other than itself. The executive class runs publicly owned corporations as if it were a simply a tool to enrich themselves, and while these executives live in the U.S. and enjoy the perks of our society, they have no desire to provide the least bit in return (as seen through the trends of off-shoring jobs and creating front companies in the Bahamas to stash their profits.)

    Corporate profits are increasingly gained by devaluing the humans that produce the product. I don’t expect this world to be fair, but I hope that Barney strikes a deal that would get as good as it gives.

  • Mr. Frank may be innovative but I do not for a second believe big business to be so.

    I’d love to be proven wrong but Big Business wants total control of the agenda. The only way frank can make it work is if Dems start regulating again, so big business will feel some pressure. Without that big stick, Frank’s proposal will thud into obscurity.

  • “God its great to having a functioning governement again…look at what DEMS have proposed to take action on as soon as the Congressional Session starts”

    Let’s hope some of these proposals actually turn to actions. It’s very easy for politicians to say what want they want to do, but turns out to be much tougher to end up doing what they say. That’s a nice gift list of proposals up there, anybody actually say how they are going to pay for them???

  • Wow. I can’t believe you people are falling for this “grand bargain”. The only ones who will make out are the big companies. I’m frankly, quite disappointed in Frank’s proposal. Here:
    Frank hopes that workers and businesses can agree on a government-administered plan paid for by workers that would reduce burdens on businesses, which would pass on savings to employees through higher wages.

    It is my belief that any plan “paid for by the workers” will result in the workers paying for the total cost of health insurance through their own wages, either through taxation or directly to an insurance company. Big business gets out of paying any of the premiums/taxes for this ‘plan’.

    As it stands, most companies pay on average, about 80% of their workers’ health care premiums. In my opinion, big business especially, should be required to provide a large portion of the funds necessary to insure Americans, since it is the large companies that benefit from these same Americans work ethic and consumerism. If anything, they should be paying MORE. Especially if we go to some form of national health insurance.

    My point is this…be very careful for what you wish for…you just may get it.

  • WHAT ABOUT ACTUAL WAGE INSURANCE AND ACTUAL HEALTHCARE??? Not just SAYING that you have it, but ACTUALLY DELIVERING it WHEN you need it????? (eyeroll)

  • I’d hope there are three provisions:

    – Corporations are taxed. No loopholes, no overseas profits, if they make profit they get taxed. They should be able to bargain some of that away for worker benefits though.

    – Diminished incentive for out-of-country operations. It will be worthless to get corporate concessions for American workers if the companies will just setup in some banana republic.

    – Voluntary compliance with any immigration policy deemed fit.

  • Well, this is the best news I’ve read today, other than Ryan Howard winning the MVP award.

    Frank is where I am: capitalism is the greatest wealth-producing system in human history, but there’s constant tension between the production of wealth and its equitable distribution. The last few years, in which corporate profits have hit all-time highs while compensation as a share of GDP has approached all-time lows, show how out of balance we’ve gotten.

    At the same time, the facts of life in this country are that we can’t get positive change without engaging the corporate sector. It’s easy and convenient to cast them as villains, but that doesn’t help the bulk of citizens who aren’t currently positioned to thrive in a you’re-on-your-own labor market.

    While I’ll wait for specifics, I’m very encouraged that Frank is initiating the conversation in this way. Corporations have a lot at stake here: the smarter among them understand that employer-based health care is killing them in global competition, and that as Baby Boomers retire and the population and workforce become more diverse, we’re going to have a serious problem with skilled-worker replacement–because overall non-white educational attainment is way, way behind that of white students. (I call it the “Jim Crow Hangover.”) Only government is sufficiently big and well-resourced enough to address these problems.

  • Did you all miss what Bubba said @2?? Frank is G-A-Y gay, gay, gay. If an anti-abortion constitutional amendment could be added to this proposal and if Frank resigned in disgrace, I might be tempted to lend my support. The stuff in the middle: wages, health care, etc. Please, don’t waste my time. I’m a Christian and I don’t have time for such mundane topics.

  • “But, but, but Frank is gay. And this sounds like something that might help families and marriages. How can that be so?” – bubba

    Well everybody knows that additional income in the family just spurs excessive spending, which the family takes beyond their means, which means mounting debt. And financial problems are the number one cause of family breakdowns and divorce.

    So clearly Frank’s attempt to give Americans more money is just a suble ploy to destroy American families 😉

  • Put me down as trusting Frank to drive a hard bargin with corporations. If you look at his record it is pretty good. For example, he voted against the odious bankruptcy bill and introduced one that would have stopped predatory lending practices.

    He has already met resistence from the business community.

    …Bruce Josten , chief lobbyist for the US Chamber of Commerce said he is worried that Frank’s grand bargain would mandate costly benefits to employees, including health care , in exchange for support of free trade.
    “His grand bargain . . . certainly is not going to sail with the American business community,” Josten said in an interview. Josten noted that Frank historically has been at odds with the US Chamber due in part to opposition to trade deals. In 2005, for example, Frank supported the chamber’s issues only 33 percent of the time.

    Frank, for his part, is unconcerned. Asked about the chamber’s low ranking of him, he responded with one of his classic zingers: “That’s more than I give them.”

    I think he used a rhetorical trick when he claimed the mantle of capitalist and embraced inequality. By doing so he preempts the squeals of creeping socialism which his efforts to turn the tide of inequalty might otherwise bring.

    I would also say that if he succeeds in strengthening unions, then workers will once again be able to fight for themselves.

  • Comments are closed.