Behold, the incredible shrinking White House

As part of its apparent new drive to get back on the offensive, the White House has done something unusual the past several days — the Bush gang has gotten personal.

It started in earnest on Friday, when the president used his Veterans’ Day to single out John Kerry for criticism. Later that day, the White House targeted Ted Kennedy.

It was apparently the start of a new trend. On Sunday, the White House published a “fact sheet” (which wasn’t particularly factual) going after a Washington Post article. Yesterday, top White House officials specifically targeted Sen. Carl Levin, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, each by name.

As a factual matter, the attacks play fast and loose with the truth. But in this instance, that’s beside the point.

There’s no modern precedent for a presidential team launching these kinds of public attacks. It’s not just that most White Houses don’t have time for such nonsense; it’s that most White Houses consider such condemnations beneath them.

It’s not presidential. It’s small. The leaders of the executive branch of our government are supposed to be above this kind of thing.

The president and his senior aides are lashing out individual senators by name? At a newspaper article? At a sitting justice of the Supreme Court? This isn’t the conduct of a White House; it’s the behavior of a desperate political campaign down in the polls.

And therein lies the point. The Bush White House is good at one thing: campaigning. They know how to attack, issue misleading press releases to reporters, manipulate stagecraft, and coordinate a message. It seems at some point over the last week, this gang realized they’re incapable of governing, so they decided to stop trying and go back to doing what they do best.

Kevin recently reminded us of John DiIulio’s White House experience, when he served as a senior Bush aide in 2001.

In eight months, I heard many, many staff discussions, but not three meaningful, substantive policy discussions….There were, truth be told, only a couple of people in the West Wing who worried at all about policy substance and analysis.

….The “faith bill”…illustrates the relative lack of substantive concern for policy and administration. I had to beg to get a provision written into the executive orders that would require us to conduct an actual information-gathering effort related to the president’s interest in the policy….and we got less staff help on it than went into any two PR events or such.

It’s only gotten worse since then.

For someone who claims to be concerned with the power of the presidency in a historical context, Bush doesn’t seem to realize that running the executive branch as if it were a campaign team is undermining the stature and significance of the White House, not to mention its effectiveness.

This team of hacks is shrinking the presidency, making Bush less of a leader and more of a campaign chairman.

I have a co-worker who says that it doesn’t matter if the president’s approval rating is only 36%, if that 36% are the people who own most of the guns.

That frame of mind, plus control of the media, plus singling out individual politicians by name, gets us a whole lot closer to the world of Hotel Rwanda than I ever wanted to get.

  • I wonder if the WH realizes that, from this point on, an attack on person X is equivalent to awarding person X a freedom medal? Kerry, Kennedy, Levin, Rockefeller, Ginsberg … there should be others and the list will surely grow. Anyone planning for a run at “the big one” in 08 had bettter get his/her name on that noble list of attackees soon.

  • The White House is getting its ass kicked these days, so they have to leash out. I think that is all this is. And the administration is so bankrupt, all they can do is slime people. Republicans suck.

  • Well stated. They are acting as a collective drunk now. I feel sorry for my country most of all.

    But hey, he was the first president to visit Mongolia. Maybe that is where his place in history will be determined. Although if firsts are what are now important to this White House, I suggest that he get on the roof of the White House and shit down into the Rose Garden. That’d be a first that wouldn’t cost the taxpayer anything.

  • Two thoughts.

    First, this is a great chance for the right person (if I were McCain, i’d think I was the right person; Harry Reid may also be the right person) to play “grown up” and call on the White House to stop with the personal attacks and focus its time and energy on righting the ship. Doing so would make that person look like the senior statesman, the stern father (or mother) of the democracy. Big points to be made, little risk.

    Second, someone not angling to be the great grown-up-of-state should take a little lower road and make the quip on a major media outlet that “The WH has, just in the past month, made personal attacks more appropriate to the playground againt [read entire list, and make sure you get every last one] — really, at some point doesn’t an honest person have to ask ‘what are the odds I’m the only one right and everyone else is wrong?'”

    That one-two punch would really make the WH’s recent tactics blow up in their smarmy faces.

  • “I suggest that he get on the roof of the White House and shit down into the Rose Garden. That’d be a first that wouldn’t cost the taxpayer anything.”

    Not only that, Bubba, it would fit right in with his frat prank personality and sense of humor.

  • If you haven’t heard this already, even Bush’s own denomination is taking him to task for his warmongering, pre-war intelligence manipulation. 96 Methodist Bishops have endorsed a church statement calling for a withdrawl plan for Iraq and refer to the Iraq war “unjust” and “immoral.” It’s quite lovely, the sort of thing all faiths EVERYWHERE should be doing– you know, talking about peace.

    (Sorry to blogwhore, but I blogged about it too.)

  • But SwiftLiars for Bush worked so well a year ago, and they’ve run out of workable alternatives ……

    Maybe the Bush White House should start an official enemies list.

  • “This team of hacks is shrinking the presidency, making Bush less of a leader and more of a campaign chairman.” …
    Really, at this point, I don’t know how anything could make Bush less of a leader than he already is. Meanwhile, I think all the sturm und drang about him saying mean things about people is useless blather. The man/woman in the street doesn’t even know who Ruth and Carl and Jay are, much less care if they are being dissed. No opening to further wound the already terminal administration with that. (But it’s fun for blogostan to get riled up it. 🙂 ) I hope the Dems stay on message about Iraq and corruption and ineptitude and leave the sticks and stones to the intelligensia.

  • This admin is showing all of the symptoms of a tyrannical dictatorship. Questions from the masses? Tell them it is for their own good. Opposition? Destroy it.

    Fifty-one percent of a nation can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic. And this WH is out to prove it. I can only guess that BushCo is taking lessons from the ghost of Julius Caeser. I should like to point out to them how Julius met his end…

    “The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”
    Frederick Douglass

    How much more can America endure??

  • With apologies to Stephanie Miller, this “earworm” should be the Dems theme song for a while, a long while the way things are going:

    He’s a lying sack of crap.
    He’s a lying sack of crap.
    He’s a lying, scheming, stinking, nasty
    sack of liquid crap.

  • The White House is rapidly becoming the ‘Forbidden City’, where a clueless and delusional emperor ( Bush ) is fawned over by loyal servants who assure him that he still rules the kingdom, while outside the gates the citzens are in revolt and his kingdom is already overthrown while he continues to issue useless proclamations that nobody pays any attention to outside of his own bedchamber.

    Sound about right?

  • Bush attacking Kerry on Veterans’ Day. Could anything be more ironic?

    Is slandering McCain and Kerry supposed to be less demoralizing for our troops than demands for honest government?

  • Vile, of course, but what’s important
    is how it plays with the media, who
    in turn feed it to the people. I hope
    the people have enough sense to
    see it for what it is, but I don’t have
    much confidence.

    Signs of desperation, to be sure.
    We’re seeing a lot of it now. Will
    be interesting to see how it plays
    out in the polls.

  • Is smearing Kerry on Veterans’ Day anything like betraying Valerie Plame, slandering John McCain, or discreditting General Shinseki? Because if it is, I’m noticing a pattern.

  • PS- And does anyone remember how they tried to blame General Garner for Iraq’s problems?

    I guess I see why they cut veterans benefits since they dislike them so much.

  • Is slandering McCain and Kerry supposed to be less demoralizing for our troops than demands for honest government?

    Great point Owen! The underlying message here is, do your duty and protect your country with your life. If you decide to get more involved in government after you get back, we’re gonna smear you. It must be the new plan to discourage any more veterans from from getting into politics.

    All these guys/girls coming back and getting into politics as Democrats must be scaring them to death. It also takes away one of their talking points. Big bad Dem lefties demoralizing our troops like that. They should be ashamed of themselves.

    I can’t think of many things that would be MORE demoralizing than veterans getting called out like that. One more step toward Vietnam, except this time it’s the government that’s doing the dissing.

  • “It’s not presidential. It’s small.”

    Excellent word choice.

    If this is how this administration acts while the GOP still controls the White House, the House and the Senate, I can’t imagine what will happen if Democrats make even modest gains in the House and Senate.

  • Comments are closed.