Biden comes awfully close to the race card

Much of the political world snickered this week when most of the Democratic presidential candidates announced that they will not participate in the Congressional Black Caucus Institute’s scheduled debate, because the event will be co-sponsored and aired by the Republicans’ Fox News Channel. When the dust settled, Joe Biden, Dennis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel — arguably the candidates with the longest odds at winning the nomination — were the only hopefuls who had agreed to attend.

This isn’t necessarily a surprise. Obviously, candidates who are struggling to break through want as much exposure and publicity as they can get.

But Biden ought to know better than to start going down this road.

“The single most important constituency in the Democratic Party — African Americans, led by the Black Caucus, which are the leadership of the black community, asked us to show for a debate and we’re not going to show up?” he said.

“Let me put it this way — if the African American community stayed home or voted Republican, we’re not going to elect another president.”

As I noted the other day, Kucinich issued a statement this week with similar rhetoric, arguing that Clinton, Edwards, and Obama decided to “snub” the CBC. “This is particularly troublesome because the concerns of African Americans should take precedent over what network is broadcasting the debate.”

Obviously, in the midst of a presidential primary fight, candidates are going to throw the occasional elbow, and score cheap points when they can. And in this case, neither Biden nor Kucinich explicitly accused their rivals of not caring about black people.

But they came rather close.

The heart of this flap is whether Democratic candidates, vying for the Democratic nomination, should legitimize the Republicans’ news network. Nearly two-thirds of the field has shown the good sense to tell the CBC Institute, “You picked the wrong co-sponsor.”

If Biden and/or Kucinich want to make the case that Fox News is a perfectly legitimate, credible news outlet, and that Democrats should have no qualms about appearing at a FNC event, fine. Let them make the case.

But instead, they’ve chosen to play the race card. Indeed, Biden’s response to questions about this focused on the role African-American voters play in national elections, as if this were somehow relevant. It was hardly a subtle message — to bypass this debate is necessarily to give the African-American community the cold-shoulder. As Biden and Kucinich see it, they care about black people; their rivals care about Fox News’ partisanship.

This is cheap and they know it.

When I was young, Ralph Nader was doing good works on behalf of consumers. He seemed to really mean it, and he accomplished important victories. But the “good” Nader was swallowed by his ego’s insatiable appetite, until all that was left was the evil egomaniacal Nader that would say and do anything to try and remain relevant, in the spotlight, ego-fed. Even give the country 8 years of George Bush and never once sound remorseful about it.

Sadly, this is where we now find Kucinich. Once a somewhat flaky but well-intentioned liberal, willing to take strong and unpopular stands 4-years ago, he now will take any cheap shot to try and stay relevant, in the spotlight, and to have his ego fed. He is irretrievably corrupted by the needs of his ego, reduced to the rantings of a nutcase.

I would love to go 3-for-3 with the analogy and say Biden, too, changed from good to bad in a tragic case of monomania and now will say anything to get noticed except (a) near as I can tell, that is how Biden has always been and (b) I’m not sure how one “honors” the CBC by having a disgraced plagiarizer take their stage.

  • Well—I suppose that if Republicans can have a fringe wing called “Moderate Republicans” who are willing to stand up for reality, then Dems can have an “in-the-Bubble” fringe wing, too. I propose the name “Faustian Fox Freaks.” I mean, after all—if they want to deal with Rupert “the Devil is my friend” Murdoch, they should expect to get burned.

  • Thank you Joe Biden and Dennis Kucinich for giving the Republicans all kinds of ammunition and talking points to use against the real candidates.

    I now know which candidate I will vote for: the one who promises Joe Biden will not become a member of his/her Cabinet.

  • I think the deeper question on this is what’s up with the Black Caucus? Why are they insisting on Fox’s participation? Is it money? Is it the fact that Fox entertainment is so popular with the black community? Has some cabal taken power in the caucus that is trying to sabotage the left? Anyone know the story behind the story?

  • “This is particularly troublesome because the concerns of African Americans should take precedent over what network is broadcasting the debate.”

    The CBC isn’t “African Americans.” It’s a few African Americans, and those persons can make the wrong choice for African Americans, just like everybody makes a mistake at least every once in a while.

    CB, why not post a link to that video of Fox racist on-air statements that the Out-Foxed guy made, and that you linked to before? The real question is why the CBC is co-sponsoring a debate with people whose channel can be culled to produce footage like this.

    This is cheap and they know it.

    How about– This is wrong and they know it.

  • I’ve been kinda irked with the CBC since they wouldn’t let Steve Cohen (D.) Memphis join. Yes he’s white, but his constituency is more than 70% African-American, and he figured they could all work together for the same causes. I understood why they didn’t, but it seemed rather petty and wrongheaded at the time, not unlike their rationale for allowing Fox to co-sponsor the Dem debate.

  • Even within CBC itself there were disagrements about letting Faux handle the debate. I expect those who were against the agreement with Faux will have a differen’t “take”, from that of Biden and Kucinich, on the situation.

  • #5 Dale: Money definitely is at play here. Fox seems to have been feeding dough to the CBC honchos for some time now. I think CB had a post or two on it days ago.

  • Fox News does not NEED to be “a perfectly legitimate, credible news outlet, ”

    It just needs to be broadcast to a sufficient number of homes to allow opportunity for Democrats to be heard in their own words.

    Whether Fox may interfere with this mission is debatable.
    If E! asked to sponsor a debate, I’d be fine with it, (more so than Fox news!) even though they have never claimed to be a news channel, credible or otherwise.

    There’s viewers of Fox who would get more out of accidentally tuning in than the public at large.
    Go on with the debate CBC. If you can pull in Dobbs and Richardson, maybe we can actually learn something about the alternatives to the three the MSM is forcing on us.

  • Comments are closed.