Bill Richardson forms exploratory committee

Because I’ve done individual posts welcoming John Edwards, Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton to the presidential race, I thought it only fair to extend the same treatment to New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson (D), who announced the formation of a presidential exploratory committee today, with a formal announcement due in March, after the state legislative session.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said Sunday he is taking the first step toward an expected White House run in 2008, offering extensive experience in Washington and the world stage as he seeks to become the first Hispanic president. […]

“Our reputation in the world is diminished, our economy has languished, and civility and common decency in government has perished,” he said in a statement. He said he had set up an exploratory committee that will allow him to begin raising money and assembling his campaign organization.

“The governor is in it to run for president,” spokesman Pahl Shipley said. The formal announcement will come in March after the end of New Mexico’s legislative session, he said. […]

In his statement, Richardson stressed his foreign affairs experience, said he wanted U.S. troops to return quickly from Iraq and urged a change of leadership in Washington that would work to bridge a wide partisan divide.

“The next president of the United States must get our troops out of Iraq without delay,” Richardson said. “I know the Middle East well and it’s clear that our presence in Iraq isn’t helping any longer.”

With some of his better known rivals dominating the political world’s attention, Richardson is often overlooked as a serious 2008 contender. That’s a mistake — this guy is a major player. If I were ranking the Dem candidates, I’d have Clinton, Obama, and Edwards in the top tier, but Richardson right behind them.

Indeed, on paper, Richardson may be one of the strongest candidates in the field, from either party.

Here’s the sales pitch:

* Richardson is the first credible Hispanic candidate in U.S. history (he does speak fluent Spanish);

* He’s a wildly popular governor of a competitive but “red” state;

* He has experience in Congress (seven-term House member), in the executive branch (Secretary of Energy), in international institutions (ambassador to the United Nations), and in international diplomacy (having engaged in negotiations in countries ranging from North Korea to Sudan).

* He’s Roman Catholic;

* Governors tend to perform better than senators in presidential elections.

Of course, elections aren’t held on paper, but for a candidate with Richardson’s talents, that’s not a bad pitch.

Don’t underestimate this one. Richardson has a great resume, he’s very personable, he has a knack for generating publicity, and he has a compelling narrative to share with voters. Keep an eye on him; he’s likely to do well.

How is Richardson’s Catholicism a point in his electoral favor exactly? I mean, it doesn’t loom as a mark against him the way it had done for JFK, but it seems to me that being a member of a religious minority in the US is at best a neutral attribute when running for President.

  • What a refreshing change. Instead of having to support the least bad candidate, I can celebrate that the Democrats are offering good candidates. I prefer Edwards, but would happily support Obama or Richardson, and if pressed, Clinton. What a change from 2004.

  • He’s got the right attitude about the war.

    After yesterdays loss of 25 American troops, Bush should call the escalation, replacement.

  • If ya’ll are looking for a quick diversion before the NFL league championship games start, I have a new Assclowns of the Week up, the Tin Soldiers and Dubya’s Coming Edition.

    Who’s on the spit in #57?

    Duhbya.
    The Pentagon.
    Ted Nugent.
    Glenn Beck.
    The IRS, and much, much more!

  • I like Richardson. Unless and until Clark gets in, he might be “my guy.” Steve has the reasons: bipartisan appeal, great resume, expertise on international relations and energy. More broadly, I think he represents the direction the party needs to go in: principled but pragmatic, not stridently partisan or ideologically rigid.

    The quesiton is whether the media will let him get any oxygen with the big names in the race, and whether he can build an organization and raise enough money given all the crowding out. If the answer is “yes,” he might be the best bet ultimately to emerge as “not Hillary.”

    There’s also the very important point that, as a western governor, he can credibly present himself as a non-Washington insider. I realize he spent a large chunk of his career in DC, but in this case I think recency trumps primacy.

  • I like Richardson too and I have for a long time. But there are mists around his personal life that will have to clear before we know how viable he really is.

    From The Washington Note:

    “The personal activities of candidates and the public ambitions ought not to collide as much as they do in our world — but there are issues that Richardson needs to address that involve his own blurring of public responsibilities and ‘what should be’ private behavior.”

    more at: http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001884.php

  • How is Richardson’s Catholicism a point in his electoral favor exactly?

    For what it’s worth, I mentioned that because Catholics are considered a swing demographic. Winning the Catholic vote is generally considered helpful, if not key, to winning a general election.

  • As a lapsed Catholic, I can almost guarantee that Catholicism will be a liability in a candidate. Right out of the gate he’ll get hammered on abortion — if he finesses it correctly “I work for the American people, not for Rome.” he might actually turn it into a plus.

    Catholics can no more be expected to vote as a swing block for Catholics than women are reliable supporters of women. Overall, I think it’s a political liability, but I’m still willing to support him 100% if he turns out to be a strong candidate.

  • If Steve Clemons’ account is credible, this guy is absolute poison to the Dems. The last thing we need is another candidate who will generate sex scandals for the Repubs to drool over.

  • I still think he’d make a great VP for Wesley Clark, even if he does draw the paleo-lithic, ubermacho, good old boy vote with some of his past (hopefully) behavior.

  • RICHARDSON RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT: WHAT A BREATH OF FRESH AIR!

    What wonderful news! Sorry to say, but Hillary, Obama, John Edwards, Kerry,et alia, seem like uninspiring recycled hacks (or in Obama’s case: greatperson, just inexperienced). To me, Bill Richardson running for President is far more interesting than any of the other announced candidates put together!

    I have been profoundly impressed with William Blaine Richardson III for 29 years. I first met him in 1978 when he worked for Senator George McGovern’s
    Foreign Relations Committee; he had a full beard as well as an endearingly messy desk on Capitol Hill, a place notorious for clean desks.

    Take the time to read Richardson’s biography: Between Two Worlds: the Making of an American Life.

    At the onset, I must clarify that my concerns are almost entirely international (for 3 years, I have been developing a UN Resolution for the UN General Assembly to create a new United Nations Undersecretary General for Nutrition and Consumer Protection; those who are curious can visit my
    groundwork website for United Nations Undersecretary General for Nutrition).

    I recently proposed to Richardson that he and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon should go together to the Sudan to convince President Al-Bashir to end
    the genocide, bring a lasting Peace to Darfur, and perhaps accept thepresence of UN troops in Darfur.

    No other Presidential candidate even comes close to the level of international diplomatic experience and abilities evidenced by Bill Richardson.

    His lengthy international resume comprise a real breath of fresh air in USA’s politics, especially after the inanities and ghastly absurdities evidenced thus far by Bush/Cheney/Halliburton/Rumsfeld and the reign of corporate-manipulated klepto-plutocrats.

    Most critics would clearly point to the Pentagon’s budget and the Pentagon’s actions as proof of this systemic erosion of America’s good sense.

    However, this is equally evident in the malfunctioning of the Food and Drug Administration, which finally has a Commissioner, Andrew Von Eschenbach, M.D.

    The FDA still rushes through approval for harmful food additive chemicals at the request of multinational corporations, the health of Americans and the
    rest of the world be damned and ignored.

    The most egregious of these chemicals is aspartame, the neurotoxic artificial sweetener that is metabolized as methanol, formaldehyde, and diketopiperazine, which was forced through the FDA in 1981 by then-CEO of G.D. Searle, Donald Rumsfeld, even though the Pentagon had already considered
    Aspartame as a biochemical weapon, and even though the FDA, to its credit, had turned down the approval for Aspartame for 16 years, since its discovery
    in 1966.

    Richardson believes that the states must take back their powers in these realms, in order to protect the health of the citizens of each state.

    This is precisely what is about to occur in the New Mexico Legislature with legislation in both chambers to ban Aspartame, which Governor Richardson has quietly encouraged. These bills are sponsored by NM Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino, an Albuquerque Democrat, and Representative Irvin Harrison, a Navajo Democrat from Gallup, New Mexico.

    In the larger international scheme of things, the average America, may have forgotten what diplomacy and non-military interventions in the processes of
    governments are all about, but I can assure you that none of the heads of state and world leaders in other nations have forgotten how Diplomacy actually works quite well.

    The incontrovertible truth is that the USA direly needs an internationalist Democrat, if there will ever be any hope of rebuilding the USA’s international image and influence, in which we are rapidly and massively
    losing traction to China, especially in Africa and in South America.

    How else will we be able to recover from the rampaging klepto-plutocrats running this Administration and what they are perpetuating domestically and internationally, by continuing to gouge the USA’s expenditures into more weapons, more troop deployment, more senseless grudge matches, and another $160 billion to waste in Iraq and in Afghanistan, regardless of how
    squandering more billions in Iraq and Afghanistan inexorably depletes America’s internal economies, the inner cities, the budgets for education, Universities, schools, social services, and research; and regardless of the loss of markets and esteem for the USA in Africa, Europe, Asia, and South America due to these depravities and depredations?

    Not long ago, Lech Walesa visited the Armand Hammer United World College of the American West in New Mexico. This Nobel Peace Laureate and former
    President of Poland observed sadly that despite its uncontested military powers, the USA has far less real political,economic, and moral power than we
    Americans perceived us as having over the past two or three decades. He unequivocally blamed the present administration for precipitating this loss of political, economic, and moral power.

    However, I don’t really believe that the USA is doomed to suffer an inevitable descent into a lamentable status as a corporate-militarized police state/3rd world economy, glutted on more and more wasted expenditures for the corporate hogs feeding at the public trough; if such a descent were totally
    inevitable, it would be a waste of time and effort for anyone to even try to countermand it.

    Bill Richardson will help to bring about such a recovery through the course of the candidates’ dialogue, if given the chance he will get as a very viable presidential candidate.

    Even if Richardson is edged out, strategists and pundits and the other candidates must recognize that he will also make a great Vice Presidential candidate. In addition to his abilities, intellect, charismatic personality, and great resume, one more reason is clearly that he will pull in a lot of Hispanic voters, and other minority voters, in all 50 states.

    New Mexicans have seen him in action as Governor for the past four years, and he was recently re-elected to a second term with the largest majority in New Mexico’s history, almost 70%!

    I welcome his presence in this ostensibly crowded field of Democratic candidates, above all because Richardson will never be one to perpetuate the
    kind of international idiocy and unavoidable resultant decline, both internally and internationally, from which we have suffered from during the past 6 years.

    We should help him win by talking with our friends, family, and colleagues in other states, and in other nations….

    Podemos todo via esperar, que non? (We can always hope, eh?)

    Stephen Fox
    Santa Fe New Mexico
    stephen@santafefineart.com
    217 W. Water St.
    Santa Fe, New Mexico 8

  • I, too, have heard about Richardson’s “zipper problems”, if that’s whats being alluded to above. We don’t need that, right now.

    He’d be great in a Cabinet position, though!

  • Bill Richardson is apparently not a lapsed Catholic. He is reported to attend Mass regularly at the Basilica in Santa Fe.

    Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of Catholicism knows that it demands total acceptance of all of its teachings. One of its permanent teachings is that abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a “criminal” practice, gravely contrary to the moral law. It also teaches Scandal is a grave offense when by deed or omission it deliberately leads others to sin gravely. (Ref: Cathechism of the Catholic Church #2322 ff). Directly voting for partial birth abortion twice and diverting NM medicaid money to pay for abortafacient drugs looks like the fruits of the sin of scandal to me.

    Bill Richardson is either morally confused or is a liar; neither trait is something I look for in the Commander in Chief. Read more at http://www.stopbill.org

    Pray for Bill Richardson.

  • So no one really has any ammo against Bill. Being Catholic is no longer a crime, and who really cares if he fooled around (as long as he’s not a hypocrite about it like those in the GOP).

    Gov. Richardson has an impressive resume, which is more that the so called top tier candidates have.

  • Not long ago, Lech Walesa visited the Armand Hammer United World College of the American West in New Mexico. This Nobel Peace Laureate and former President of Poland observed […] — Stephen Fox, @12

    Even though I’d left Poland by the time Walesa came to the forefront of international attention, I did keep up (still do) with what’s going on there. And I knew the people who’d put him into prominence.

    Walesa is *the last* person you’d want to associate your name with, even indirectly. He’s another Bush — just Catholic, not Protestant. Stupid, illiterate, capable of contradicting himself twice within a single sentence, arrogant, gross (both n person and in behaviour)… Intellectuals built him up, gave him lines to speak and supported him because, at the time, *anything* was better than “the system”. His Nobel Prize — unlike those of Marie Sklodowska-Curie, Czeslaw Milosz and Wislawa Szymborska (or even Henryk Sienkiewicz) — was a political statement, not something he deserved (there are plenty of other examples of that, esp in non-science fields, among the Eastern Europe receivers of NP).

    I’m not surprised to hear that Richardson’s fans would parade Walesa as a plus — if all one hears about Richardson is true, then the two do have *something* (if not much) in common — the sleazy attitude towards women; it’s common in Polish culture, it’s common in the Latino culture.

    I don’t, particularly, like Hillary (as I said yesterday) but, unless the rumours about Richardson’sbehaviour can be put to rest *soon*, he’s gonna be even lower on my list of choices, no matter his accomplishments in public life.

    Uptown (@16) can’t be a woman, to blow off such sleaze that easily; for me, it’s not acceptable at all. And there’s a worry about R’s stance vis Roe. I have my reservations about abortion being as easily accessible as a bottle of Coke but it should be legally available, if as a last resort. But, male Catholics tend to hate *any* kind of bridle on their libidos (Walesa has what? 10 kids? One of them conceived while his wife visited him, for an hour, in an internment camp???) and are totally oblivious to the disaster multiple and unwelcome pregnancies can wreak on women’s lives.

    Uh, huh; not my guy. Secretary of State, maybe. *If* he’s watched carefullyand all his staff is male…

  • Sorry folks, I was a Bill Richardson fan until I learned of his sexual shenanigans.

    The whole point of an election is to win. If Richardson is the nominee, I can just hear the commercials, the interviews, the (likely) pictures. Richardson would never get his message out.

    We have to win in 2008. Let’s promote Richardson for Secretary of State.

  • Indeed, on paper, Richardson may be one of the strongest candidates in the field, from either party.

    Of course, elections aren’t held on paper…

    See: Gore vs. Bush, Kerry vs. Bush.

    Zippers aside, the main strike against Richardson is his appearance. Frankly, would America want to see him running shirtless on a beach? (Not that America has to.) He’s no William Howard Taft, but…

  • #16: “and who really cares if he fooled around…”

    Actually, a lot of voters care. If you’re willing to cheat on the one person you’ve taken vows to, then what does that say about your moral and ethical fiber?

    Think about it… he (may have) broken the vows of marriage: is he more or less likely to respect the contract he has with the voter?

  • A morally suspect politico that leaked national secrets and let an elderly main rot under solitary confinement just to save political face?

    Not in my lifetime. I find it laugable that people talk up this guy.

    Find the 60 Minutes broadcast from 1999, and later rebroadcast in 2000. Richardson is basically Dick Cheney in this interview.

  • I don’t think he’ll win. Mainly because I’ve never heard of him before and the fact that he’s Hispanic. Unfortunately, even in politics, Americans are celebrity-driven in their choices in the 2008 presidential race. Bill Richardson isn’t Arnold Schwarzenegger. Most people don’t know who the Governor of New Mexico is. Many don’t even know who the government of their own state is, unless he or she gets a lot of air time on Fox News.

  • Comments are closed.