Blair, Schwarzenegger strike global-warming deal

Good news and bad news today on the [tag]global warming[/tag] front. First, the good news.

Britain and California are preparing to sidestep the Bush administration and fight global warming together by creating a joint market for greenhouse gases.

British Prime Minister [tag]Tony Blair[/tag] and California Gov. [tag]Arnold Schwarzenegger[/tag] plan to lay the groundwork for a new trans-Atlantic market in carbon dioxide emissions, The Associated Press has learned. Such a move could help California cut carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases scientists blame for warming the planet. President Bush has rejected the idea of ordering such cuts.

The basis for the Blair-Schwarzenegger agreement, which is scheduled to be announced this afternoon in Los Angeles, is to fix a price on carbon pollution, set caps on emissions, and “reward businesses that find a profitable way to minimize their carbon emissions, thereby encouraging new, greener technologies.” It’s all part of what’s called a “carbon trading program,” which already exists in Europe, and stems from the Kyoto Protocol.

As the 12th largest source of greenhouse gases in the world, California’s role in this deal is an important step in the right direction. The bad news, of course, is that the Bush administration is opposed to whole thing.

One of the higher-profile meetings on climate change is set to bring together this week British Prime Minister Tony Blair, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and about 25 chief executive officers of major corporations around the world.

But the Bush administration will be a conspicuous no-show.

Bush’s top environmental adviser, James Connaughton, was invited to today’s gathering in L.A., but announced he would skip the event, citing a “scheduling conflict.”

What an odd international dynamic. The prime minister of one of the nation’s closest allies can’t make any progress with our federal government, so he has to start striking deals with governors.

Just the kind of stand-up leadership we’ve come to expect from the Bush White House, which is committed to not “passing on problems to future generations.”

Eek! Not the Kyoto Protocol!

  • It’s about time that Blair finally decided to grow a little backbone. This isn’t the first time in the last couple of weeks that he’s given Georgie Boy a subtle elbow in the ribs policy-wise. It’s not enough, but it’s a start.

  • I heard about this in the news, and my first thought was: Will the Terminator secede from the Union? It’s good to see “the decider” get “out-decided” and “straw-manned” at the same time….

  • Really good news that CA and GB are taking the lead on this. But really bad news that the US, as defined by the Bush presidency, is not only not leading the charge but is being obstructive.

  • Funny…
    And so apropos.

    Remember B and his “Who cares what you think”?

    Bit by bit… piece by piece… the planet as a whole is saying this right back at him.

    Here is an interesting side thought:

    Given the imperial presidency and the concentration of power in the excutive branch, isn’t it ironic that the B himself is being globally ignored and step over?

    That’s beautiful… is it not?

  • I was watching the movie “Love Actually” over the weekend where Hugh Grant plays the British PM and Billy Bob Thornton plays the President. This reminds me of the scene where Grant says that they won’t simply go along with the American position simply because of our historical relationship together. Good for the Brits on this and give Arnie his credit too. I loved Blair if for nothing else than his eloquence, then despised him for his apparent acquiescence to all things Bush w/r/t Iraq and WMD. It is nice to see a bit of backbone from him but unfortunately it means that yet another ally no longer sees eye to eye with us. How very sad. I despise Bush and Cheney with every fiber of my being but I weep for our future. Save Ferris.

  • GWB is the lamest duck president in history. He has been lame since he ignored the voice of the people and tried to rob social security. Thank God! Every time he tries to do something he screws it up.

  • Any conflict with Article I Section 10 of the US Constitution on Schwartzenegger’s part? Not sure where the line is drawn on these trade deals between states and foreign governments.

    No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

    No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

    No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

  • I always told Democrats Arnie was smarter than they gave him credit for. It’s things like this that will get him re-elected in November.

    Too bad we can’t secede from Bushland completely.

  • Comments are closed.