Blessed are the assassins

By now, nearly everyone has probably heard that TV preacher Pat Robertson has put aside his Christian sensibilities and called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. As Pat explained on his 700 Club program yesterday:

“You know, I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war…. We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don’t need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It’s a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.”

The web is filled, of course, with the mockery you’d expect. Pat is ignoring one of the Commandments he wants posted in courthouses, Pat has put aside the whole WWJD? question, etc. But there’s a point I’d like to add that most people may not realize: Pat Robertson says stuff like this all the time.

Indeed, for a man who considers himself one of America’s foremost religious leaders, Robertson is almost preoccupied with wanting to see others killed. In August 1999, Robertson called for a series of assassinations as part of an “aggressive” American foreign policy. A year earlier, Robertson said Floridians would get killed by “a meteor” because of Gay Day festivities in Orlando.

More recently, in 2003, Robertson expressed his displeasure with the U.S. State Department by saying “we need a very small nuke thrown off on Foggy Bottom to shake things up.” A few months before that, he told his television audience that he hoped God would kill off a Supreme Court justice or two.

In other words, a former Republican presidential candidate, ally of George W. Bush, and “religious leader” for millions of conservative Christians in America is a vocal advocate of mass murder — and has been for a long time. Yesterday’s lunacy generated headlines, but it wasn’t anything unusual for this sad and deranged man.

And here’s the kicker: it won’t matter. Republicans won’t denounce Robertson, no one in the administration or Congress will distance themselves from him, and his followers will continue to send him cash. With today’s right, there simply are no limits. Robertson, alas, is a mainstream figure in the conservative movement.

Post Script: As an aside, who wants to bet on when some relatively high-profile conservatives tacitly defend Robertson today by noting how awful Hugo Chavez really is? It’s inevitable.

As I’ve posted elsewhere, Robertson was long an advocate of assassinating Sadaam, and weeks before 9/11 he was advocating genocide against the Islamic world. None of this is new or shocking for that sicko.

  • Bush and Robertson are buddies. Maybe someone should see if the White House has a comment about assassinating Chavez? That could be hilarious.

  • “As an aside, who wants to bet on when some relatively high-profile conservatives tacitly defend Robertson today by noting how awful Hugo Chavez really is? It’s inevitable.”

    Perfect counterpoint, Mr. C.B., to what I was thinking: “WHERE is the outrage? Our pathetic CCCP (Compliant Complicit Corporate Press) barely even mentions this most recent incident, let alone providing the context that TCR provides regarding Robertson’s despicable bloodlust on display on far too many occasions in the past.

    Will the CCCP ask leading Rethugs or Fundies to refute it? Will we see editorials excoriating Robertson the same way we see ANY Dem evicerated for their statements (Dean, Gore, etc.)? Will the RNC condemn it? Will the White House? Yeah, right, and I’m Shaquille O’Neal today, pigs are flying, and Santa Claus is coming down my chimney right now seeking a new calendar because of global warming (well, that last one just may very well be true, thanks to BushCo)!!

    My own Post Script: I’m curious if anyone here has a clue of why I use the acronym CCCP instead of MSM or SCLM? There is a connection to my purposes and what supposedly stirred Robertson’s latest ravings. If anyone is interested, I’d be happy to fill you in…

  • Simple. CCCP is the Russian acronym for USSR, where the media was a political apparatus, AL. Well, I’m assuming so: my knowledge of Soviet history is slim. But I think it’s a VERY good point to make when discussing Chavez. One of the most poignant aspects of the attempted coup is how the pro-opposition media went along with and supported the coup attempt.

  • Two thoughts:
    1) No one has mentioned that Chavez was ELECTED as president of Venezuela, and more than once. And that he is wildly popular, at least among the poor (that is the majority) of their population. So where is the support for democracy? Oh, it’s not the winner BushCo wanted, so the press…doesn’t press the point.
    2) Does Robertson have any airwaves leases from the FCC? This (along with the rest of his ravings) is obscene to me, and I think that any station airing this call to violence sould be fined the maximum penalty fo offensive speech.

  • This was one of the people Bush was getting counsel from while he was putting together the clusterfuck that is Iraq. Small wonder things turned out badly.

  • Yeah, I’m with Buzzmon. The third iteration of the whole justification for this war was democracy. The man was ELECTED and we backed an attempt to topple his government and have an oligarchy run by oil barrons.

    Democracy, Republican style: we express the will of the people through the barrel of a gun, and the people don’t always know what they want.

    When are we going to learn that forcing pro-US governments on countries are inevitably toppled and replaced by anti-US governments?

  • For those who didn’t watch the whole “newscast”, after Rev. Pat was done calling for the murder of another human being the subject moved on to the new Iraqi Constitution. Specifically, Robertson was upset that they’re basically setting up an Islamic Republic. I thought, hey, we actually agree on something! But then Robertson goes on to blame “the liberals” for allowing this to happen? I know such tactics are common in the right-wing playbook, but c’mon, can anyone actually take him seriously? The “liberals” aren’t running Congress, the White House, or the Pentagon. It’s sad that Robertson can’t lay blame where it is due: on W and his inept staff.

  • I heard this morning that gas in Venezuela is 12 cents a gallon.

    Robertson is actually following a long, ignoble tradition in organized Christianity. Heretics, pagans, “witches” (i.e., women who don’t know their place), fine art (think Savanarola) … all merited total destruction at the very least … preferably with lots and lots of truly horrific torture for the amusement of the Saved. Ad Majori Dei Gloriam.

    It took the emergence of the secular state (city-state, nation-state) to declare such religious “love” illegal, to contain it. Sometimes, as here, crawls out from under its smarmy rock.

    Pat’ll apologize today … no, strike that … explain that he was totally misunderstood about all this. Heh, heh.

  • Aaaaack. My Latin teacher would roll over in his grave … except for the fact that he’s still living. It’s “Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam”.

    Why is it that you can always spot your mistakes more easily once they’re irretrievably published?

  • Per CBS 7/11/2003:

    “How dare the president of the United States say to the duly elected president of another country, ‘You’ve got to step down,'” Robertson said Monday on “The 700 Club,” broadcast from his Christian Broadcasting Network.

    And who was Robertson talking about?

    “Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson accused President Bush of “undermining a Christian, Baptist president to bring in Muslim rebels” by asking Liberian President Charles Taylor, recently indicted for war crimes, to step down.”

    “It’s one thing to say, we will give you money if you step down and we will give you troops if you step down, but just to order him to step down? He doesn’t work for us.”

    Robertson had an $8 million investment in a Liberian gold mining venture under an agreement he made with Taylor’s government. The gold mine investment supposedly was intended to help pay for humanitarian and evangelical efforts in Liberia.

  • Under the leadership of both Bush and that right winger Roertson is the reason the good old USofA has gone to HELL !!

  • Wildly popular? hardly. Even when he was the most popular he got less than 45% of the vote. After the 1999 election, no numbers are trustworthy since he controls the electoral board, the supreme court of justice and everything in between.

    Oh, and by the way, the comments Pat Robertson made were of an economic nature, not rligious. After all, it would be cheaper to take him out now, than to take him out (if at all) when the armed conflict -which seem innevitable if remains in power- actually happens.

    There you go, you got your televangelist nut, and we got our deranged communist nut which is not just a tragedy to us, but a real threat to you guys.

  • Comments are closed.