Bloomberg speculation to begin anew?

There was plenty of speculation over the summer about whether NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg might run as an independent candidate for president. He’d deny interest, but then tease reporters with some kind of ambiguous answer about intentions. This went back and forth for a while, until in August, Bloomberg stopped being coy.

Asked by Dan Rather if he might run, Bloomberg said, “No.” Asked if there were “any circumstances” in which he would launch a campaign, the mayor added, “Oh, I don’t know. Any — the answer — if I don’t say no categorically you’ll then read something into it. The answer is no.”

A few weeks ago, there Bloomberg was again on the cover of Newsweek, alongside a headline that reads, “The Billion-Dollar Wild Card.” The 7,000-word article broke no new ground — the mayor still said he isn’t running.

But just when it seemed the political world could finally move on to focus on the 16 actual candidates, new information emerges to rekindle the speculative fires. Sam Stein reports:

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been receiving foreign policy briefing sessions on a wide variety of topics, providing the strongest indication yet that he is considering a run for the White House, the Huffington Post has learned.

The sessions, which were confirmed by multiple sources, have been conducted with Nancy Soderberg, a former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and a Clinton Administration foreign policy adviser. One source described her as “Bloomberg’s Condi.”

A range of topics have been discussed, from non-proliferation to the defense budget, with a specific focus on the war in Iraq.

These sessions dramatically contradict Bloomberg’s denials that he is planning to run for president. The one aspect of his possible candidacy that is considered missing is foreign policy experience. These strategy sessions with Soderberg seem clearly designed to fortify that weakness.

The Huffington Post has also learned that one of the main reasons Soderberg was chosen is that she is not currently associated with any presidential campaign.

Make of this what you will.

At this point, it solely depends on who the other two candidates are.

If it’s Clinton vs. Giuliani, Bloomberg might go, and I’ll be 100 percent with him. Actually, the only Republican I could see keeping him out if our party makes the Clinton mistake is Romney: the Mittster’s general-election appeal will rest on his managerial acumen, which is Bloomberg’s big selling point.

  • Bloomberg’s entire following consists of David Broder and Joe Klein. — memekiller @2

    I wish… But my husband says he’d also vote for Bloomberg before he’d vote for Clinton and he’s none too sure about about the Bloomberg vs Obama race (shades of upbringing. He’s 83 and Virginia born and bred. Though he did vote for Wilder for Governor. Don’t know how come racism is speaking to him now more than before). We both started off daydreaming about Gore and both moved to Edwards as our first choice but, beyond there, our paths have split. It’s not just that he gets his info from MSM, while I get mine from blogs; it’s also that he’s building up anti-left resistance… Mostly, I think, built on the basis of what he hears about blogs and progressives… from MSM. He also thinks David Brooks is fair and balanced…

  • misha2, at 4

    We’re so far away from Richmond, neither of us gives a d..n about what’s going on there (even supposing we might know, which is unlikely, as we don’t read VA newspapers). We both had some reservations about the way he ran the state, but he was no worse than most pols, if no better, either… My point is that my lily-white, Southern-bred husband, who had no reservations about voting for Wilder as Governor years ago, suddenly began to consider Obama’s skin-colour a barrier (even though, when attacked, he tries to say it’s “lack of experience” he’s worried about). And he”d be likely to vote for Bloomberg sooner than for either Obama or Clinton. At the same time he’d sooner vote for Obama than for anyone the Repubs put up, so I don’t want Bloomberg to run.

  • Comments are closed.