Bush doesn’t quite know how to answer Abramoff questions

Dan Froomin noted today that the president’s press conference “was a frustrating experience for journalists whose specific questions were largely answered with imprecise comments related to their general topic.” It’s an entirely fair description, particularly when it came to questions about Jack Abramoff’s connections to the White House.

Q: Mr. President, you talked about Jack Abramoff in the context of pictures, but it may not necessarily just be about pictures. He also had some meetings with some of your staff. So you remember, you ran on the idea of restoring honesty and integrity to the White House. So why are you letting your critics perhaps attack you and paint you with maybe a guilt by association? Why not just throw open your books and say, look, here is —

Bush: There is a serious investigation going on by federal prosecutors, and that’s their job. And they will — if they believe something was done inappropriately in the White House, they’ll come and look, and they’re welcome to do so. There’s a serious investigation that’s going on.

Q: But, sir, don’t you want to tell the American people, “Look, as I promised, this White House isn’t for sale and I’m not for sale?”

Bush: It’s hard for me to say I didn’t have pictures with the guy when I did. But I have also had pictures with thousands and thousands of people.

The clumsiness with which Bush dodges the questions is almost amusing. Asked if he should help show Americans that the White House isn’t for sale, Bush explains that he gets his picture taken with a lot of people. The problem isn’t just that there’s a disconnect between the question and answer, but that Bush doesn’t even seem to realize what the question is. I know that’s not the case, which makes his dissembling all the more bizarre.

It got rather embarrassing.

Q: Never mind about the photographs…. Can you say, sir, whether you were lobbied by Jack Abramoff or other lobbyists, and what your policy is about lobbyists meeting with senior staff?

Bush: You know, I, frankly, don’t even remember having my picture taken with the guy. I don’t know him.

I know the president occasionally has trouble with his ears, but he does hear the questions, right?

Several times, reporters asked why the president doesn’t just come clean and tell the public about Abramoff’s WH ties. Each time, Bush dodged the question. As a rule, when the president acts like he has something to hide, he has something to hide.

Words hardly do this justice. You really need to listen to the press conference to fully appreciate his boobishness.

  • “Bush doesn’t even seem to realize what the question is. I know that’s not the case”

    …ummmmm, Carpetbagger, are you sure?

  • I know the president occasionally has trouble with his ears, but he does hear the questions, right?

    I’m not so sure he hears the questions. More likely he listens for key words in the question. He heard the word Abramoff and automatically answered a question about pictures, or not knowing him. I’m sure he was in a back room somewhere getting coached on the answers before he came out. I can only assume it’s how he got his c-average degree. Cram for the test before you walk in.

  • Obviously Bush is very, VERY worried about the photos, to the point where his anxiety leads him to interpret every question as being about the photos.

    Those pix must be some doozies. Maybe there are photos of him signing legislation with Abramoff’s hand on his shoulder, using Abramoff’s pen. Or maybe its worse than that…..

    Bush’s flat-out unsolicited lies are his “tells.”

  • The Right claims that eavesdropping is okay because unless you have something to hide then you have nothing to fear. Unless of course, you are a Rightwing Chickenhawk Prez who wants to dodge questions about a very corrupt lobbyist who contributed heavily to his Prez campaigns. Would not that logic apply? You know, like perhaps he’s avoiding the questions because he’s got something to hide? Oh yeah, I forgot. He’s the Right’s Prez and we can’t do anything like that to embarass him.

  • One more point —

    If the Liberal Party can lose in Canada and Fattah can lose to Hamas, then “the party of corruption” has to be scared shitless in 2006.

    That’s why Bush was “photo obsessed” today.

  • George Bush’s pained attempts to disown any association with
    Jack Abramoff reminds me of another time when someone once
    very forcefully said (3 times as it turns out) “But I don’t even know
    the man!” When Simon Peter betrayed Christ someone got
    crucified.
    Maybe George Bush is fearing a similar outcome.

  • The Abramoff pictures were pulled at Jack’s request. His defense team feels any photos of him, taken with unsavory characters will hurt his chances for a fair trial.

  • Comments are closed.