Bush ‘fixes’ Thomas Jefferson’s thoughts on the 4th of July

On Friday, to help honor Independence Day, the president appeared in Charlottesville, Virginia, and hosted a naturalization ceremony at Monticello. Bush had quite a bit to say about the president who called Monticello home.

“The principles that Thomas Jefferson enshrined in the Declaration became the guiding principles of the new nation. And at every generation, Americans have rededicated themselves to the belief that all men are created equal, with the God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

“Thomas Jefferson understood that these rights do not belong to Americans alone. They belong to all mankind. And he looked to the day when all people could secure them. On the 50th anniversary of America’s independence, Thomas Jefferson passed away. But before leaving this world, he explained that the principles of the Declaration of Independence were universal. In one of the final letters of his life, he wrote, ‘May it be to the world, what I believe it will be — to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all — the Signal of arousing men to burst the chains, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government.'”

That’s very nice, but as Ed Brayton noted, it’s not quite what Jefferson said. Here’s the actual portion from the letter Bush referenced (thanks to R.M. for the heads-up):

“May it be to the world, what I believe it will be, (to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all,) the signal of arousing men to burst the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves, and to assume the blessings and security of self-government.” [emphasis added]

Hmm. Jefferson’s actual sentiments weren’t quite what Bush wanted to say, so it looks like Bush’s speechwriters gave Jefferson a little touch-up.

Are you actually asking BGII to quote a Deist criticism of organized religion?

Really, not going to happen.

  • It is a minor omission, or could be arguably such, but the point I dislike is that the official White House transcription doesn’t place an ellipsis on the excision. This makes the citation incorrect, in my anal opinion at least.

  • hey, the Bush administration has “touched up” a lot of TJ’s contributions to the concepts of self-governance, liberty, and the rule of law, what’s the big deal about a little letter 6 months from the end of his term. Those 18th century guys used big words and weird phrasings like “habeas corpus” and “empire of laws” and such – sometimes you gotta “update” these things for modern readers.

  • The elision may have been an effort to get around the word “monkish” not because it might offend any modern constituency but because the word would need explaining.

  • If the Codpiece had looked at the quote, he’d probably wonder how Jefferson knew about the TeeVee show “Monk.”

  • Opiate of the masses, anyone? If Repubs can twist a centrist Democrat’s words to sound like Marx to them, imagine their absolute horror when one of the Founders’ words do, without even being twisted first.

  • It’s certainly not the worst offense of Bush, but it is demonstration of his willful ignorance of the views of the founders. When you’ve been hammering away on the concept of separation of church and state, and claiming that liberty is a divine gift, you can’t very well go and offer an exact quote of the author of a Declaration that suggests that organized religious beliefs have often been tools to prevent self-governing liberty.

  • By not making it a religious thing, Bush is trying not to insult Islam- not the worst thing in the world and certainly not something worth writing a post about.

  • Please, it is not a minor omission. The religious right has been trying to claim Jefferson as one of their own for a long time, see, e.g., the whole “Christian nation” nonsense, while consciously avoiding the fact that Jefferson would have viewed them with contempt as the embodiment of the superstition and irrationality against which the Enlightenment rebelled. For an administration that has reigned under the banner of pious superstition and ignorance to twist Jefferson’s words in such a manner is neither an immaterial nor an inadvertent maneuver.

  • Hmmmm, BBB…is Islam the religion to which Jefferson referred? Or maybe it was something closer to home? Something we’re still grappling with here and that born again Bush embraces so completely that God speaks directly to him and through him.

  • It’s what Jefferson would have said if only he’d been exposed to the supreme awesomeness of George W. Bush.

  • Don’t miss the real irony here. Bush, in this speech, says that the guiding principles of the Declaration “do not belong to America alone.” At the same time, his Administration strips non-citizens of legal rights: access to courts, legal representation; privacy, freedom, and life itself because they are “not citizens.” Such hypocracy is breathtaking.

  • The Chimperor thought TJ was talking about monkeys and didn’t want to insult the like minded poo-flingers that make up the 28%ers.

    It’s been a while since I’ve been to C-ville but messing around with the words of Mr. Jefferson isn’t best foot forward, either.

  • “…the chains under which monkish ignorance and superstition had persuaded them to bind themselves,…”

    Uh, like fear mongering that the terrorists will kill us if we don’t give up our freedoms.

  • Oh, the Quote Mining game! Yes, that’s a lot of fun.

    Isaiah 44:6
    There is no god

    Isaiah 44:8
    There is no god

    Isaiah 45:5
    There is no god

    Isaiah 45:14
    There is no god

    Isaiah 45:21
    There is no god

    2 Chronicles 6:14
    There is no god

    Deuteronomy 32:39
    There is no god

    1 Kings 8:23
    There is no god

    2 Kings 1:16
    There is no god

    2 Kings 5:15
    There is no god

    Psalms 14:1
    There is no god

    Psalms 53:1
    There is no god

    See? It’s in the Bible TWELVE times, so it MUST be true!

  • The interesting thing I saw was where GWB was heckled at the citizenship ceremony about several issues, he had the protesters removed, and then turned to the new citizens, saying something like, “See, in America, we have freedom of speech.” Of course, i saw no reporting about what happened to the protesters (most likely arrested or cited for “disturbing the peace,” most benevolently; or much more threateningly, arrested, detained, hustled away in black SUVs, interrogated using “high-intensity techniques,” and refused legal representation as “terrorists,” and “threats to Homeland Security”).

    Yeah, “freedom of speech” means not being shot down on the spot. Right.

  • Bush, so concerned with the spreading of “democracy” to selected evil empires, yet so determined that even the rights of American citizens are dependent upon his whims.

    Freedom of speech means that you have the right to be jailed for speaking freely.

  • Does anyone notice another irony here? The rights of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” belong to “all mankind.” But not, apparently, to anyone that Bush chooses to designate an “unlawful enemy combattant,” because those people can be imprisoned indefinitely, tortured (even if we don’t call it that) and sometimes murdered or allowed to die of untreated diseases in our custody.

  • Frak- It doesn’t matter what Jefferson meant if Bush used it, the statement would be construed to be an insult against Islam. Isn’t there enough REAL problems caused by Bush not to waste breath on this?

  • So much for the strict constructionist interpretation, eh?

    At some point, I may share my impression that, contrary to word on the street, Bush has moved us further toward a theocracy by this kind of crap and disregarding the Constitution than he ever could have by accomplishing any of the religous right’s pet projects. I’m in too good of a mood for that kind of rant today.

  • “Americans have rededicated themselves to the belief that all men are created equal, with the God-given right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

    So Bush also decides to replace “their Creator” with “God”. Go figure.

    If TJ was describing the Abrahamic God, as Bush seems to allude here, then why not just put “God” there in the first place? Was he trying to be politically correct?

  • BBB, @21,

    How could “monkish ignorance and superstition” *possibly* be construed as a slam against Islam, of all religions? Islam has no monks; Christians (and Buddhists) do.

    re the omission itself: Bu..Sh.. figured he’d introduce those newly-minted citizens to the reality of US ways: “you only need to know what we’re willing to tell you and we hope you won’t seek other sources of info, especially if you’re planning on voting.”

  • libra- because such points really don’t matter to the media or the blogosphere. Bush said something that’s anti-religious, he’s talking about spreading democracy around the world, HE MUST BE INSULTING ISLAMIC COUNTRIES!!!!

  • Just another beeeuteeful example of Duhyba’s bubble brained stupidity and intellectual vacuousness. Most adults would check the citations and numbers that their speech writers put into a speech, just so they wouldn’t make themselves look like idiots.
    One of the many truly scary things about the Bush family is how comfortable their are in making public fools of themselves.

  • Comments are closed.